Interoperability Challenges for ICT-enabled Governance: Towards a pan-European Conceptual Framework

In the European academic and institutional debate, interoperability is predominantly seen as a means to enable public administrations to collaborate within Members State and across borders. The article presents a conceptual framework for ICT-enabled governance and analyses the role of interoperability in this regard. The article makes a specific reference to the exploratory research project carried out by the Information Society Unit of the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre on emerging ICT-enabled governance models in EU cities (EXPGOV). The aim of this project is to study the interplay between ICTs and governance processes at city level and formulate an interdisciplinary framework to assess the various dynamics emerging from the application of ICT-enabled service innovations in European cities. In this regard, the conceptual framework proposed in this article results from an action research perspective and investigation of e-governance experiences carried out in Europe. It aims to elicit the main value drivers that should orient how interoperable systems are implemented, considering the reciprocal influences that occur between these systems and different governance models in their specific context.

[1]  D. Sim.  The Rise of the Network Society (The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 1) , 1998 .

[2]  Ann Crowley Smith,et al.  Administrative innovation in municipal government , 1985 .

[3]  J. MacLaughlin,et al.  World Cities in a World-System , 1997 .

[4]  Carlo Batini,et al.  GovQual: A quality driven methodology for E-Government project planning , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[6]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[7]  Gianluigi Viscusi,et al.  E-governance for development: lessons learned and strategic principles for designing an operational roadmap , 2010 .

[8]  Idabc.  European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services , 2004 .

[9]  Jeremy Millard.  Reorganisation of Government Back-Offices for Better Electronic Public Services , 2004, EGOV.

[10]  Eur. N. Loukis,et al.  Digital Era Governance--IT Corporations, the State and e-Government , 2007 .

[11]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[12]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  The Principles of Sociotechnical Design , 1976 .

[16]  Sarah A. Binder,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions , 2008 .

[17]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  E-Governance in Africa: From Theory to Action; a Handbook on icts for Local Governance , 2007 .

[18]  Jane E. Fountain.  Notes on the Impact of Research on the Development of eGovernment (Invited Article) , 2007 .

[19]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[20]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  e-Government 2015: exploring m-government scenarios, between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implications , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[22]  J. Alford,et al.  Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social‐Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[23]  E. Trist,et al.  A Socio-Technical Perspective , 1993 .

[24]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Public Sector: Early Stage of a Deep Transformation , 2001 .

[25]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[26]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  Assessing Emerging ICT-Enabled Governance Models in European Cities: Results from a Mapping Survey , 2010, EGOV.

[27]  J. Loughlin.  Subnational Democracy in the European Union , 2001 .

[28]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Information Systems for eGovernment - A Quality-of-Service Perspective , 2010 .

[29]  D. Cabrera,et al.  Systems thinking. , 2008, Evaluation and program planning.

[30]  J. Loughlin.  Subnational Democracy in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities , 2004 .

[31]  M. Castells.  Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[32]  S. Krätke.  Berlin: Towards a Global City? , 2001 .

[33]  V. Schmidt.  Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse , 2008 .

[34]  James N. Danziger.  Technology and Productivity , 1979 .

[35]  Luis E. Anido-Rifón,et al.  Methodologies, Technologies and Tools Enabling e-Government , 2010, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[36]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places , 1996 .