A Research Based Perspective on SEC’s Proposed Rule on ROADMAP FOR Potential Use of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by U.S. Issuers

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a call for comment on a proposal to adopt a Roadmap for potential use of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) by U.S. Companies. We comment on five key issues raised by the SEC proposal. First, we propose that the need for a global regulator is overstated. A global regulator is unlikely to help achieve the stated goals of comparability and consistency of financial reporting on a global basis. We favor allowing U.S. companies to choose use of U.S. GAAP or IFRS rather than mandating one global monopoly set of standards. Second, we agree that the focus on auditing is a very relevant issue that deserves more attention from standard setters. Gains from adopting principles based accounting standards such as IFRS are likely to be realized only if auditors are also principles based. Third, while we have serious concerns about governance and financing mechanisms of IASB, we recommend that all regulatory actions cannot be held to a standstill while structural changes are made to the IASB. Fourth, we are not in favor of requiring reconciliation schedules from U.S. companies using IFRS. We view such reconciliations as being costly and unnecessary. Fifth, we recommend that the SEC pay more explicit attention to the educational and professional judgment consequences of its proposals. This comment was developed by the Financial Accounting Standards Committee of the American Accounting Association and does not represent an official position of the American Accounting Association.

[1]  K. Jamal,et al.  Effect of Principles-Based versus Rules-Based Standards and Auditor Type on Financial Managers’ Reporting Judgments , 2009 .

[2]  S. Sunder.  IFRS and the Accounting Consensus , 2009 .

[3]  Peter D. Wysocki,et al.  Global Accounting Convergence and the Potential Adoption of IFRS by the United States: An Analysis of Economic and Policy Factors , 2009 .

[4]  S. Sunder.  Adverse Effects of Accounting Uniformity on Practice, Education, and Research 1 , 2007 .

[5]  R. Litan,et al.  Worldwide Financial Reporting: The Development and Future of Accounting Standards , 2006 .

[6]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  Financial Reporting Incentives for Conservative Accounting: The Influence of Legal and Political Institutions , 2005 .

[7]  United Kingdom..  Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the United States and the , 2005 .

[8]  Karim Jamal,et al.  Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. And the U.K. , 2003 .

[9]  Michelle H. Yetman,et al.  How Representative are Firms that are Cross Listed in the United States? An Analysis of Accounting Quality , 2003 .

[10]  Frederick Gill,et al.  Principles-Based Accounting Standards , 2003 .

[11]  S. Sunder.  Regulatory Competition Among Accounting Standards within and Across International Boundaries , 2002 .

[12]  Karim Jamal,et al.  Privacy in E-Commerce: Development of Reporting Standards, Disclosure and Assurance Services in an Unregulated Market , 2002 .

[13]  Jerry R. Strawser,et al.  Characteristics Influencing Perceptions of Accounting Pronouncement Quality , 2002 .

[14]  C. Leuz.  IAS versus US GAAP: Information Asymmetry-Based Evidence from Germany's New Market , 2002 .

[15]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions , 2001 .

[16]  Peter Collett,et al.  International Harmonization: Cautions from the Australian Experience , 2001 .

[17]  Shyam Sunder,et al.  Why Not Allow FASB and IASB Standards to Compete in the U.S. , 2001 .

[18]  Dennis R. Beresford.  Congress Looks at Accounting for Business Combinations , 2001 .

[19]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View , 2001 .

[20]  Ashok Robin,et al.  Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries, and Implications for Acceptance of IAS , 2000 .

[21]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting , 2000 .

[22]  Morton Pincus,et al.  Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings , 2000 .

[23]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings , 1999 .