Efficiency analysis of organic light-emitting diodes based on optical simulation

In spite of huge progress in improving the internal quantum efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), these devices still suffer from poor light out-coupling. Loss mechanisms are for example waveguiding in the organic layers and the substrate as well as the excitation of surface plasmons at metallic electrodes. Their relative strength and the mutual dependence on the OLED structure have been studied both experimentally and by numerical simulation. Here, we consider the impact of the radiative quantum efficiency of the emitter material on predictions of light extraction from OLEDs. Competing processes resulting in non-radiative recombination of charge carriers usually reduce the emitter quantum efficiency in a real device. We show that optical simulation leads to erroneous conclusions when neglecting these competing processes. Furthermore, we demonstrate a method, which allows determining both the radiative quantum efficiency and the charge recombination factor via simulation based analysis of experimental data. This analysis of device efficiency is applied on a set of red-emitting electrophosphorescent devices.

[1]  J. Shiang,et al.  Application of radiative transport theory to light extraction from organic light emitting diodes , 2004 .

[2]  Stefan Nowy,et al.  Light extraction and optical loss mechanisms in organic light-emitting diodes: Influence of the emitter quantum efficiency , 2008 .

[3]  Richard H. Friend,et al.  Effect of metal films on the photoluminescence and electroluminescence of conjugated polymers , 1997 .

[4]  Stephen R. Forrest,et al.  Weak microcavity effects in organic light-emitting devices , 1998 .

[5]  M. Baldo,et al.  Simplified calculation of dipole energy transport in a multilayer stack using dyadic Green's functions. , 2007, Optics express.

[6]  Benjamin Claus Krummacher,et al.  General method to evaluate substrate surface modification techniques for light extraction enhancement of organic light emitting diodes , 2006 .

[7]  W. Barnes,et al.  Fluorescence near interfaces: The role of photonic mode density , 1998 .

[8]  Ifor D. W. Samuel,et al.  Light Out‐Coupling Efficiencies of Organic Light‐Emitting Diode Structures and the Effect of Photoluminescence Quantum Yield , 2005 .

[9]  Hironaka Fujii,et al.  Improvement of coupling-out efficiency in organic electroluminescent devices by addition of a diffusive layer , 2004 .

[10]  Brian D'Andrade,et al.  Intrinsic luminance loss in phosphorescent small-molecule organic light emitting devices due to bimolecular annihilation reactions , 2008 .

[11]  Charles E. Swenberg,et al.  Electronic Processes in Organic Crystals and Polymers , 1999 .

[12]  Joseph John Shiang,et al.  Experimental demonstration of increased organic light emitting device output via volumetric light scattering , 2004 .

[13]  W. Lukosz,et al.  Light emission by magnetic and electric dipoles close to a plane dielectric interface. II. Radiation patterns of perpendicular oriented dipoles , 1977 .

[14]  Ronald R. Chance,et al.  Lifetime of an emitting molecule near a partially reflecting surface , 1974 .

[15]  J. A. E. Wasey,et al.  Efficiency of spontaneous emission from planar microcavities , 2000 .

[16]  Lukas Novotny,et al.  Allowed and forbidden light in near-field optics. I. A single dipolar light source , 1997 .

[17]  J. Sturm,et al.  Optimization of external coupling and light emission in organic light-emitting devices: modeling and experiment , 2002 .

[18]  Stephen R. Forrest,et al.  Transient analysis of organic electrophosphorescence. II. Transient analysis of triplet-triplet annihilation , 2000 .