Young drivers and graduated licensing: The Ontario case

Despite improvements in road safety over the past several decades, accident rates remain high for young drivers. One accident countermeasure that is expected to improve the safety record of this group is graduated licensing. The philosophy behind this licensing system is that novice drivers, of whom the majority are young, should be restricted to relatively safe driving environments during the initial learning period. Graduated licensing was implemented in the Province of Ontario, Canada in 1994. The objective of this study is to estimate the potential benefits and costs for young drivers associated with two components of the Ontario graduated licensing package: the late-night driving curfew and the high-speed roadway restrictions. Based on accident and travel data for the year 1988, accident-involvement rates per kilometre driven were calculated for different driver groups for various combinations of time of day and roadway speed limit. These rates were then applied to the expected mobility profiles of young drivers affected by graduated licensing. The results of the study support the late-night curfew and suggest that this component of the licensing package should reduce total accident involvements for the affected group by up to 10 percent and fatal accident involvements by up to 24 percent, while reducing their total driving by only four percent. By contrast, the empirical evidence suggest that the high-speed roadway restrictions are likely to increase accident involvements, and thus it is strongly recommended that this component of Ontario's graduated licensing package be changed.

[1]  Richard D. Blomberg,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CURFEW LAWS ON MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES , 1984 .

[2]  D T Levy,et al.  The effects of driving age, driver education, and curfew laws on traffic fatalities of 15-17 year olds. , 1988, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  A F Williams,et al.  Nighttime driving and fatal crash involvement of teenagers. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Herbert M. Simpson,et al.  YOUNG DRIVER ACCIDENTS: MAGNITUDE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROBLEM , 1981 .

[5]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1991 .

[6]  D. Massie,et al.  Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J Pucher PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENTS: CANADA VS. THE UNITED STATES , 1994 .

[8]  A. Smiley,et al.  The role of exposure in comparisons of crash risk among different drivers and driving environments. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  A C Donelson,et al.  Youth, alcohol and relative risk of crash involvement. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  A. Smiley,et al.  Time vs. distance as measures of exposure in driving surveys. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Michael Sivak,et al.  MULTIPLE ERGONOMIC INTERVENTIONS AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY , 1985 .

[12]  R. Schwing,et al.  The Distribution of Risks: Vehicle Occupant Fatalities and Time of the Week , 1988 .

[13]  Julian A Waller Alcohol, Young Drivers, and Traffic Accidents , 1986 .

[14]  A K Lund,et al.  City curfew ordinances and teenage motor vehicle injury. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  D R Mayhew,et al.  NEW TO THE ROAD. YOUNG DRIVERS AND NOVICE DRIVERS: SIMILAR PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS? , 1990 .

[16]  R. Kitamura An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis , 1988 .

[17]  S G Stradling,et al.  Determinants of intention to commit driving violations. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  James T. Reason,et al.  SOCIAL FACILITATION AND DRIVER BEHAVIOUR , 1990 .

[19]  Mary Chipman,et al.  The role of exposure, experience and demerit point levels in the risk of collision , 1982 .

[20]  P J Cooper,et al.  An examination of the crash involvement rates of novice drivers aged 16 to 55. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  T P Hutchinson Road accident statistics , 1989 .