Predicting Airline Choices: A Decision Support Perspective and Alternative Approaches

The ability to predict the choices of prospective passengers allows airlines to alleviate the need for overbooking flights and subsequently bumping passengers, potentially leading to improved customer satisfaction. Past studies have typically focused on identifying the important factors that influence choice behaviors and applied discrete choice framework models to model passengers’ airline choices. Typical discrete choice models rely on two major assumptions: the existence of a utility function that represents the preferences over a choice set and the linearity of the utility function with respect to attributes of alternatives and decision makers. These assumptions allow the discrete choice models to be easily interpreted, as each unit change of an input attribute can be directly translated into change in utility that eventually affects the optimal choice. However, these restrictive assumptions might impede the ability of typical discrete choice models to deliver operational accurate prediction and forecasts. In this paper, we focus on developing operational models that are intended for supporting the actual prediction decisions of airlines. We propose two alternative approaches, pairwise preference learning using classification techniques and ranking function learning using evolutionary computation. We have empirically compared these approaches against the standard discrete choice framework models and report some promising results in this paper.

[1]  Yoshinori Suzuki,et al.  THE IMPACT OF AIRLINE SERVICE FAILURES ON TRAVELERS' CARRIER CHOICE: A CASE STUDY OF CENTRAL IOWA , 2004 .

[2]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Genetic Programming: An Introduction , 1997 .

[3]  Norman Ashford,et al.  Carrier Choices of Air Passengers in Pacific Rim: Using Comparative Analysis and Complementary Interpretation of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Data , 1996 .

[4]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[5]  Richard P. Lippmann,et al.  An introduction to computing with neural nets , 1987 .

[6]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[7]  Dustin Boswell,et al.  Introduction to Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[8]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Genetic Programming-Based Discovery of Ranking Functions for Effective Web Search , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Clifford Winston,et al.  Enhancing the performance of the deregulated air transportation system. , 1989 .

[10]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[11]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[12]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Yoshinori Suzuki,et al.  Modeling and Testing the "Two-Step" Decision Process of Travelers in Airport and Airline Choices , 2007 .

[15]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[16]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[17]  Steven M Nako,et al.  FREQUENT FLYER PROGRAMS AND BUSINESS TRAVELLERS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION / , 1992 .

[18]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Airport and Airline Choice in a Multiple Airport Region: An Empirical Analysis for the San Francisco Bay Area , 2001 .

[19]  Jeffrey I. McGill,et al.  Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[20]  Richard E. Chatwin,et al.  Continuous-Time Airline Overbooking with Time-Dependent Fares and Refunds , 1999, Transp. Sci..