Atomique: a photo repository for decentralized and distributed photo sharing on the web

Photo sharing sites such as Flickr [3] and Fotolog [4] allow users to publish, organize, and explore photos in a community context combining sharing, annotation, and conversation. However, most hosted communities have architectural and institutional shortcomings due to their usually centralized nature. Users have little or no control over the community's policies, functionality, or appearance. The social data, such as contacts, comments, and group activity, are locked within a community, while it is usually not possible to interact with users from other communities. In this work we introduce Atomique a Web-based software enabling decentralized photo sharing by using open data formats and protocols from the blogosphere, i.e., RSS and Trackback, allowing exchange and discussion of photos in decentralized groups.

[1]  Patrick Danowski,et al.  Bibliothek 2.0 - Die Zukunft der Bibliothek? , 2006 .

[2]  William R. Durell Data Administration: A Practical Guide to Successful Data Management , 1985 .

[3]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friendster and publicly articulated social networking , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[4]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[5]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[6]  Atsuo Yoshitaka,et al.  A Survey on Content-Based Retrieval for Multimedia Databases , 1999, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[7]  P. Kollock The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[8]  Protima Banerjee About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design: Alan Cooper and Robert Reimann Published by John Wiley & Sons, 2003, 576 pp, ISBN 0764526413 , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  CBIR: from low-level features to high-level semantics , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, WWW '04.

[11]  Alan Knight,et al.  Objects and the Web , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[12]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[13]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[14]  Karl Aberer,et al.  PIX-Grid: A Platform for P2P Photo Exchange , 2003, CAiSE Workshops.

[15]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Designing for appropriation , 2007, BCS HCI.

[16]  Deborah J. Armstrong The quarks of object-oriented development , 2006, CACM.

[17]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina Sociality with Objects : Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies , 1997 .

[18]  Protima Banerjee,et al.  Book Review: About Face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design , 2004, Inf. Vis..

[19]  Laurian M. Chirica,et al.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, SIGF.

[20]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  F. E. A Relational Model of Data Large Shared Data Banks , 2000 .

[22]  Anne Galloway,et al.  Panel: Design for Hackability , 2004 .

[23]  S. Rettberg All Together Now : Collective Knowledge , Collective Narratives , and Architectures of Participation , 2005 .

[24]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Experiment 1 : Motivating Conversational Contributions Through Group Homogeneity and Individual Uniqueness , 2010 .

[25]  Grigory Begelman,et al.  Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space , 2006 .

[26]  Paul Miller Coming Together around Library 2.0: A Focus for Discussion and a Call to Arms , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[27]  Jesse James Garrett Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications , 2007 .

[28]  Tantek Çelik,et al.  Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web , 2006, WWW '06.

[29]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Structured versus unstructured tagging: a case study , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[30]  R. Rockwell,et al.  An infrastructure for social software , 1997 .

[31]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Library and information science: practice, theory, and philosophical basis , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Context data in geo-referenced digital photo collections , 2004, MULTIMEDIA '04.

[33]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of Weblogs , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[34]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  The Five Laws of Library Science , 1948 .

[35]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Hierarchical faceted metadata in site search interfaces , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[36]  Alberto Del Bimbo,et al.  Visual information retrieval , 1999 .

[37]  Kathy J. Lee What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space , 2006, CSCW '06.

[38]  Kevin Li,et al.  Faceted metadata for image search and browsing , 2003, CHI '03.

[39]  Olga De Troyer,et al.  WSDM: A User Centered Design Method for Web Sites , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[40]  Alexander Dekhtyar,et al.  Information Retrieval , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[41]  John Riedl,et al.  tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution , 2006, CSCW '06.

[42]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging Systems , 2006 .

[43]  M. Naaman,et al.  Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Article, ToRead , 2006 .

[44]  Michael Gorman Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[45]  Michael J. Albers,et al.  Book Review: Information Architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing Large-Scale Web Sites , 2000 .

[46]  Djemel Ziou,et al.  Image Retrieval from the World Wide Web: Issues, Techniques, and Systems , 2004, CSUR.

[47]  Marti A. Hearst Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration , 2006, Commun. ACM.