Recall of landmarks in information space

Research on navigation and landmarks in physical space, information space and virtual reality environments indicates that landmarks play an important role in all types of navigation. This dissertation tackles the problem of defining and evaluating the characteristics of landmarks in information space. This work validates a recent theory that three types of characteristics, structural, visual and semantic, are important for effective landmarks. This dissertation applies concepts and techniques from the extensive body of research on physical space navigation to the investigation of landmarks on a web site in the World Wide Web. Data was collected in two experiments to examine characteristics of web pages on the University of Pittsburgh web site. In addition, objective measurements were made to examine the characteristics of web pages with relation to the experimental data. The two experiments examined subjects' knowledge, use and evaluation of web pages. This research is unique in research on web navigation in its use of experimental techniques that ask subjects to recall from memory possible navigation paths and URLs. Two measures of landmark quality were used to examine the characteristics of landmarks; one, an algorithm that incorporated objective measures of the structural, visual and semantic characteristics of each web page, and the second, a measure based on the experimental data regarding subjects' knowledge and evaluation of the page. Analysis of this data from a web space confirms the tri-partite theory of characteristics of landmarks. Significant positive correlations were found between the objective and subjective landmark measures, indicating that this work is an important step toward the ability to objectively evaluate web pages and web site design in terms of landmarks. This dissertation further suggests that the characteristics can be utilized to analyze and improve the design of information spaces and lead to more effective navigation by users.

[1]  Stephen C. Hirtle,et al.  The Nature of Landmarks for Real and Electronic Spaces , 1999, COSIT.

[2]  Tony J. Prescott,et al.  Spatial Representation for Navigation in Animats , 1996, Adapt. Behav..

[3]  Thomas S. Tullis A method for evaluating Web page design concepts , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[4]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[5]  John A. Waterworth,et al.  Effects of desktop 3D world design on user navigation and search performance , 2000, 2000 IEEE Conference on Information Visualization. An International Conference on Computer Visualization and Graphics.

[6]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The effect of spatial layout of and link colour in web pages on performance in a visual search task and an interactive search task , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[8]  Stephen C. Hirtle,et al.  Acquisition of spatial knowledge for routes , 1991 .

[9]  Mark Chignell,et al.  Hypermedia: design for browsing , 1993 .

[10]  A. Devlin,et al.  Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women , 1995 .

[11]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  The Cognitive Map: Could It Have Been Any Other Way? , 1983 .

[13]  G. W. Furnas,et al.  Generalized fisheye views , 1986, CHI '86.

[14]  R. Lal Tummala,et al.  Mobile robot navigation using artificial landmarks , 1997, J. Field Robotics.

[15]  Ying K. Leung,et al.  Utilising Landmarks for Web Site Navigation , 2001, WebNet.

[16]  Graham Storrs,et al.  Characterizing user navigation through complex data structures , 1985 .

[17]  R. Lal Tummala,et al.  Mobile robot navigation using artificial landmarks , 1997 .

[18]  Martin Raubal,et al.  Topologic and Metric Decision Criteria for Wayfinding in the Real World and the WWW , 2002 .

[19]  C. Donald Heth,et al.  Differential use of landmarks by 8-and 12-year-old children during route reversal navigation , 1997 .

[20]  Carolyn L. Foss,et al.  Tools for reading and browsing hypertext , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  T. Collett,et al.  Insect navigation en route to the goal: multiple strategies for the use of landmarks , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Multimedia and Hypertext: The Internet and Beyond , 1995 .

[23]  N. Gale,et al.  Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition , 1987 .

[24]  Gerald Salton,et al.  Automatic text processing , 1988 .

[25]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  The Role of Global and Local Landmarks in Virtual Environment Navigation , 2000, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ..

[26]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Navigation in Information Spaces: supporting the individual , 1997, INTERACT.

[27]  Birgit Elias,et al.  Extracting Landmarks with Data Mining Methods , 2003, COSIT.

[28]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[29]  K M Gothard,et al.  Binding of hippocampal CA1 neural activity to multiple reference frames in a landmark-based navigation task , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Landmarks in Graphs , 1996, Discret. Appl. Math..

[31]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Nearness relations in environmental space , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Nicole Yankelovich,et al.  Context and orientation in hypermedia networks , 1989, TOIS.

[33]  Albert C. Stevens,et al.  Distortions in judged spatial relations , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Reference points in spatial cognition. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[35]  J R Wilson,et al.  Navigation in hypertext through virtual environments. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  John A. Begoray An Introduction to Hypermedia Issues, Systems and Application Areas , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[37]  Paul W. Munro,et al.  Emergence of Global Structure from Local Associations , 1993, NIPS.

[38]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Hypertext and hypermedia , 1990 .

[39]  Pat Langley,et al.  Place recognition in dynamic environments , 1997 .

[40]  Mark Blades,et al.  Wayfinding Theory and Research: The Need for a New Approach , 1991 .

[41]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Route Adaptive Selection of Salient Features , 2003, COSIT.

[42]  M. Dodge,et al.  Mapping Cyberspace , 2000 .

[43]  S. Ellis Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments , 1991 .

[44]  Hanhwe Kim,et al.  Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[45]  Guoray Cai,et al.  Clusters on the World Wide Web: creating neighborhoods of make-believe , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[46]  Romedi Passini,et al.  Wayfinding in Architecture , 1984 .

[47]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site , 2000, CHI.

[48]  Tawfiq M. Abu-Ghazzeh MOVEMENT AND WAYFINDING IN THE KING SAUD UNIVERSITY BUILT ENVIRONMENT: A LOOK AT FRESHMAN ORIENTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION , 1996 .

[49]  M. Mascolo,et al.  Effect of semantic clustering on the memory of spatial locations. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Mark A. Foltz Designing navigable information spaces , 1998 .

[51]  Ray McAleese Hypertext: Theory into Practice , 1998 .

[52]  Julie Chen,et al.  The bloodhound project: automating discovery of web usability issues using the InfoScentπ simulator , 2003, CHI '03.

[53]  William T. Neveitt Spatial knowledge navigation for the World Wibe Web , 2000 .

[54]  Rudy Darken,et al.  Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds , 1996, CHI.