Effect of Different Levels of Maternally Derived Antibodies on Protection Against Infectious Bursal Disease Virus

Abstract Fertile eggs were obtained from three different broiler breeder flocks with different levels of virus neutralizing antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus. Egg yolk from these flocks was tested for antibody titers by the virus neutralization test. Flock I eggs had no antibodies, flock II had medium level antibodies (1:200–1600; geometric mean = 1:975), and flock III had a high level of antibodies (1:1600–6400; geometric mean = 1:3365). Chicks from the above flocks were challenged each with 102 50% embryo infective dose of the IN serotype 1 variant virus at 1, 2, and 4 wk of age and examined at 5 and 11 days postchallenge. The average organ/body weight ratios were calculated and statistically analyzed. Chicks with no maternal antibodies were not protected at any age. Chicks with medium levels of maternal antibodies were protected when challenged at 1 and 2 wk of age. Chicks with high levels of maternally derived antibodies were protected when challenged at all the ages tested. The above results were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

[1]  H. Müller,et al.  Susceptibility of chicken blood lymphoblasts and monocytes to infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) , 2005, Archives of Virology.

[2]  P. Woolcock,et al.  Infectious bursal disease. , 1994 .

[3]  S. Shawky Maternally acquired immunoglobulin G in turkey poults : distribution on mucosal surfaces and protective role in the gut / , 1993 .

[4]  R. D. Miles,et al.  Subclinical Infectious Bursal Disease in an Integrated Broiler Production Operation , 1992, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[5]  Y. Saif,et al.  Infectious bursal disease virus variant from commercial Leghorn pullets. , 1990, Avian diseases.

[6]  O. Fletcher,et al.  Isolation, identification, and pathogenicity of two field strains of infectious bursal disease virus. , 1989, Avian diseases.

[7]  K. Fahey,et al.  Assessment by ELISA of passively acquired protection against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens. , 1987, Australian veterinary journal.

[8]  Y. Saif,et al.  Replication of infectious bursal disease virus in continuous cell lines. , 1987, Avian diseases.

[9]  T. Carpenter,et al.  Comparison of egg yolk and serum for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. synoviae antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 1986, Avian diseases.

[10]  S. Naqi,et al.  Maternal antibody and its effect on infectious bursal disease immunization. , 1983, Avian diseases.

[11]  N. Chettle,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy of four inactivated infectious bursal disease oil emulsion vaccines , 1982, Veterinary Record.

[12]  K. Hirai,et al.  In vitro infection of fractionated chicken lymphocytes by infectious bursal disease virus. , 1981, Avian diseases.

[13]  G. W. Wood,et al.  The interaction of live vaccine and maternal antibody in protection against infectious bursal disease. , 1981, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[14]  P. Dobos Peptide map comparison of the proteins of infectious bursal disease virus , 1979, Journal of virology.

[15]  K. Hirai,et al.  Characterization of Immunosuppression in chickens by infectious bursal disease virus. , 1979, Avian diseases.

[16]  K. Hirai,et al.  Further morphological characterization and structural proteins of infectious bursal disease virus , 1979, Journal of virology.

[17]  B. Calnek,et al.  In vitro replication of infectious bursal disease virus in established lymphoid cell lines and chicken B lymphocytes , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[18]  C. Scholtissek,et al.  The genome of infectious bursal disease virus consists of two segments of double-stranded RNA , 1979, Journal of virology.

[19]  O. Fletcher,et al.  Immunization Studies with a Cell-Culture-Adapted Infectious Bursal Disease Virus , 1979 .

[20]  S. B. Hitchner,et al.  Infectious Bursal Disease Emulsified Vaccine: Effect upon Neutralizing-Antibody Levels in the Dam and Subsequent Protection of the Progeny , 1979 .

[21]  G. Cullen,et al.  Susceptibility of chicks to infectious bursal disease (IBD) following vaccination of their parents with live IBD vaccine , 1978, Veterinary Record.

[22]  J. Smith,et al.  Broiler-breeder vaccination against infectious bursal disease and persistence of maternal antibody in progeny. , 1978, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[23]  H. Becht,et al.  Structural and growth characteristics of infectious bursal disease virus , 1976, Journal of virology.

[24]  G. Cullen,et al.  Maternally derived antibody--effect on susceptibility of chicks to infectious bursal disease. , 1976, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[25]  W. H. Allan,et al.  Immunosuppressive effect of infectious bursal agent on vaccination against Newcastle disease , 1974, Veterinary Record.

[26]  S. B. Hitchner Persistence of parental infectious bursal disease antibody and its effect on susceptibility of young chickens. , 1971, Avian diseases.

[27]  F. W. Brambell The transmission of passive immunity from mother to young , 1970 .

[28]  A. Cosgrove An Apparently New Disease of Chickens: Avian Nephrosis , 1962 .