Two-period pricing and strategy choice for a supply chain with dual uncertain information under different profit risk levels

Abstract With the rapid development of e-commerce and Internet technology, multi-period dynamic pricing is a natural choice that conforms to the demand trend of customers who make product purchase decisions based on current prices, past observed prices (reference prices) and past product reviews in a repeated market. This study considers a problem of two-period pricing and strategy choice for a supply chain consisting of a supplier and a retailer in the presence of uncertain basic market demand and uncertain product review. The supplier adopts a price commitment or differential pricing strategy and the retailer responds with a stage pricing or first-period pricing strategy, which constitutes four strategies. A concept of the profit risk level of a supply chain (PRLS) is proposed to characterize the profit risk of the supply chain due to dual uncertain information. Under the four strategies and different PRLSs, we find that the retailer prefers to set a lower retail price in the second period than in the first period to obtain more profits. Interestingly, although the profits of participants in the supply chain increase with the PRLS, the retail price in the second period is convex about the PRLS, which is contrary to the intuition that high risks imply high prices. Furthermore, our results reveal that the strategy under which the supplier uses a differential pricing strategy and then the retailer responds with a stage pricing strategy is the best under the four strategies for a given PRLS because it is win-win for the supplier and retailer. Finally, an optimal PRLS is suggested to balance the profits and risks, which shows that the expectation is not always an appropriate decision rule.

[1]  Lu Yang,et al.  Coopetition Strategy and Pricing Timing in an Outsourcing Supply Chain With Uncertain Operation Risks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Purchasing, Pricing, and Quick Response in the Presence of Strategic Consumers , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  Uncertain agency models with multi-dimensional incomplete information based on confidence level , 2013, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[4]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  An uncertain search model for recruitment problem with enterprise performance , 2017, J. Intell. Manuf..

[5]  Ek Peng Chew,et al.  Joint inventory allocation and pricing decisions for perishable products , 2009 .

[6]  Houmin Yan,et al.  Channel Coordination with a Risk‐Neutral Supplier and a Downside‐Risk‐Averse Retailer , 2005 .

[7]  Kai Yang,et al.  The impact of risk attitude in new product development under dual information asymmetry , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Baoding Liu,et al.  Uncertainty Theory - A Branch of Mathematics for Modeling Human Uncertainty , 2011, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[9]  Refik Güllü,et al.  Joint inventory and pricing decisions with reference effects , 2014 .

[10]  Xin Chen,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Inventory Management with Reference Price Effects , 2016, Oper. Res..

[11]  K. Lai,et al.  Two-period pricing and ordering policy for the dominant retailer in a two-echelon supply chain with demand uncertainty , 2009 .

[12]  Seungjin Whang,et al.  Demand Uncertainty and the Bayesian Effect in Markdown Pricing with Strategic Customers , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[13]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Reverse logistics network design and planning utilizing conditional value at risk , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  A. Dasci,et al.  Two-period dynamic versus fixed-ratio pricing in a capacity constrained duopoly , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  B. Giri,et al.  Two-period pricing and decision strategies in a two-echelon supply chain under price-dependent demand , 2017 .

[16]  Zhong Yao,et al.  Impact of the downside risk of retailer on the supply chain coordination , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[17]  Ruiqing Zhao,et al.  Impact of cost uncertainty on supply chain competition under different confidence levels , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[18]  Hyun-Soo Ahn,et al.  Pricing and Manufacturing Decisions When Demand is a Function of Prices in Multiple Periods , 2007, Oper. Res..

[19]  Sriram Dasu,et al.  Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Chi Zhou,et al.  Optimal incentive contracts under loss aversion and inequity aversion , 2019, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[21]  Harry M. Markowitz,et al.  Mean-variance approximations to expected utility , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Tadeusz Sawik,et al.  Optimization of cost and service level in the presence of supply chain disruption risks: Single vs. multiple sourcing , 2014, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Dynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects , 2007, Oper. Res..

[24]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[25]  Baoding Liu,et al.  Uncertainty Theory - A Branch of Mathematics for Modeling Human Uncertainty , 2011, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[26]  Bo Li,et al.  Uncertain principal-agent models for providing information service with moral hazards , 2018, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems.

[27]  T. Comes,et al.  A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling ☆ , 2015 .

[28]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  Supply chain coordination through cooperative advertising with reference price effect , 2013 .

[30]  L. Liang,et al.  Strategic pricing with reference effects in a competitive supply chain , 2014 .

[31]  Kevin McCormack,et al.  Analysing risks in supply networks to facilitate outsourcing decisions , 2010 .

[32]  Konstantin Kogan,et al.  The effect of risk aversion on a supply chain with postponed pricing , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  Lin Chen,et al.  Contract designing for a supply chain with uncertain information based on confidence level , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..