Static security region calculation with improved CPF considering generation regulation

Static security region (SSR) plays a crucially important role in power system monitoring and operation. Boundaries of SSR are usually obtained through continuation power flow (CPF) calculation. Considering the effects of generation regulation, this paper improves the CPF for boundary computation of SSR in two aspects: 1) a general method of handling the effects of active power and reactive power limits is provided so that the CPF results are independent of slack bus selection; 2) a general interface for CPF to incorporate generation regulation is proposed. This improved CPF for boundary computation of SSR when considering generation regulation is realized and then tested on IEEE-14 and IEEE-118 systems. Test results show the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Dynamic Load Flow Technique for Power System Simulators , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Ping Yan Modified distributed slack bus load flow algorithm for determining economic dispatch in deregulated power systems , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[3]  H. Sasaki,et al.  A predictor/corrector scheme for obtaining Q-limit points for power flow studies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  C.-C. Liu,et al.  Analysis of tap-changer dynamics and construction of voltage stability regions , 1988, 1988., IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[5]  Tao Liu,et al.  Consideration of generator excitation current limitation for the improved continuation power flow , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology.

[6]  K. Tomsovic,et al.  Slack bus treatment in load flow solutions with uncertain nodal powers , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[7]  Felix F. Wu,et al.  Steady-state voltage stability regions of power systems , 1985 .

[8]  Felix Wu,et al.  Steady-state voltage stability regions of power systems , 1984, The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Claudio A. Canizares,et al.  On the linear profile of indices for the prediction of saddle-node and limit-induced bifurcation points in power systems , 2003 .

[10]  Federico Milano,et al.  Equivalency of Continuation and Optimization Methods to Determine Saddle-Node and Limit-Induced Bifurcations in Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[11]  K. Iba,et al.  Calculation of critical loading condition with nose curve using homotopy continuation method , 1991 .

[12]  Hsiao-Dong Chiang,et al.  CPFLOW: a practical tool for tracing power system steady-state stationary behavior due to load and generation variations , 1995 .

[13]  Hongjie Jia,et al.  Visualization of voltage stability region of bulk power system , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Power System Technology.

[14]  Venkataramana Ajjarapu,et al.  The continuation power flow: a tool for steady state voltage stability analysis , 1991 .

[15]  R. H. Lasseter,et al.  Re-dispatching generation to increase power system security margin and support low voltage bus , 2000 .

[16]  A.C.Z. de Souza,et al.  Tracing PV and QV curves with the help of a CRIC continuation method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  S. Kumagai,et al.  Steady-State Security Regions of Power Systems , 1982 .