Heterochrony underpins natural variation in Cardamine hirsuta leaf form

Significance A key problem in biology is whether the same processes underlie morphological variation between and within species. Here, we show that the causes of leaf shape diversity at these two evolutionary scales can be divergent. Some species have simple leaves, whereas others bear complex leaves comprising leaflets. Previous work indicated that these interspecific differences result mostly from variation in local tissue growth and patterning. Now we find that a different process, age-dependent shape progression, underlies within-species variation in complex leaf morphology. Specifically, in plants with accelerated aging and early flowering, leaves progress to adult shapes with more leaflets, faster than their slower-aging counterparts. This mechanism coordinates leaf development with reproductive timing and may influence resource allocation to seeds. A key problem in biology is whether the same processes underlie morphological variation between and within species. Here, by using plant leaves as an example, we show that the causes of diversity at these two evolutionary scales can be divergent. Some species like the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana have simple leaves, whereas others like the A. thaliana relative Cardamine hirsuta bear complex leaves comprising leaflets. Previous work has shown that these interspecific differences result mostly from variation in local tissue growth and patterning. Now, by cloning and characterizing a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for C. hirsuta leaf shape, we find that a different process, age-dependent progression of leaf form, underlies variation in this trait within species. This QTL effect is caused by cis-regulatory variation in the floral repressor ChFLC, such that genotypes with low-expressing ChFLC alleles show both early flowering and accelerated age-dependent changes in leaf form, including faster leaflet production. We provide evidence that this mechanism coordinates leaf development with reproductive timing and may help to optimize resource allocation to the next generation.

[1]  D. Weigel,et al.  Temporal Control of Leaf Complexity by miRNA-Regulated Licensing of Protein Complexes , 2014, Current Biology.

[2]  Jie Peng,et al.  Resolving Distinct Genetic Regulators of Tomato Leaf Shape within a Heteroblastic and Ontogenetic Context[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[3]  M. Lenhard,et al.  Repeated Evolutionary Changes of Leaf Morphology Caused by Mutations to a Homeobox Gene , 2014, Current Biology.

[4]  M. Nordborg,et al.  Multiple FLC haplotypes defined by independent cis-regulatory variation underpin life history diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2014, Genes & development.

[5]  J. Weller,et al.  Genetic Control of Heterochrony in Eucalyptus globulus , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[6]  R. Mott,et al.  Cardamine hirsuta: a versatile genetic system for comparative studies. , 2014, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[7]  F. Vuolo,et al.  Leaf Shape Evolution Through Duplication, Regulatory Diversification, and Loss of a Homeobox Gene , 2014, Science.

[8]  V. Orgogozo,et al.  THE LOCI OF REPEATED EVOLUTION: A CATALOG OF GENETIC HOTSPOTS OF PHENOTYPIC VARIATION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  R. Poethig,et al.  Vegetative phase change and shoot maturation in plants. , 2013, Current topics in developmental biology.

[10]  Xianzhong Feng,et al.  The genetic basis for natural variation in heteroblasty in Antirrhinum. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[11]  M. Todesco,et al.  Independent FLC Mutations as Causes of Flowering-Time Variation in Arabidopsis thaliana and Capsella rubella , 2012, Genetics.

[12]  G. Coupland,et al.  The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  C. Lister,et al.  Quantitative Modulation of Polycomb Silencing Underlies Natural Variation in Vernalization , 2012, Science.

[14]  M. Todesco,et al.  Natural Variation in Biogenesis Efficiency of Individual Arabidopsis thaliana MicroRNAs , 2012, Current Biology.

[15]  C. Alonso-Blanco,et al.  Altitudinal and Climatic Adaptation Is Mediated by Flowering Traits and FRI, FLC, and PHYC Genes in Arabidopsis1[W] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[16]  C. Dean,et al.  A Polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory , 2011, Nature.

[17]  C. Helliwell,et al.  FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) regulates development pathways throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  N. Ori,et al.  Dynamic growth program regulated by LANCEOLATE enables flexible leaf patterning , 2011, Development.

[19]  R. Poethig,et al.  The effect of the floral repressor FLC on the timing and progression of vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis , 2011, Development.

[20]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  MiRNA Control of Vegetative Phase Change in Trees , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[22]  Sibum Sung,et al.  Vernalization-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing by a Long Intronic Noncoding RNA , 2011, Science.

[23]  A. Plessis,et al.  Evolution and Diverse Roles of the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON Genes in Arabidopsis Leaf Development[C][W] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[24]  N. Hall,et al.  Arabidopsis thaliana Leaf Form Evolved via Loss of KNOX Expression in Leaves in Association with a Selective Sweep , 2010, Current Biology.

[25]  Joy Bergelson,et al.  Association mapping of local climate-sensitive quantitative trait loci in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Y. Eshed,et al.  Morphogenesis of Simple and Compound Leaves: A Critical Review , 2010, Plant Cell.

[27]  José M. Martínez-Zapater,et al.  Temporal analysis of natural variation for the rate of leaf production and its relationship with flowering initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[28]  J. Bowman,et al.  The flowering hormone florigen functions as a general systemic regulator of growth and termination , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  C. Vincent,et al.  PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina , 2009, Nature.

[30]  G. Horiguchi,et al.  The more and smaller cells mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana identify novel roles for SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE genes in the control of heteroblasty , 2009, Development.

[31]  David L Stern,et al.  Is Genetic Evolution Predictable? , 2009, Science.

[32]  A. Pulido,et al.  A Conserved Molecular Framework for Compound Leaf Development , 2008, Science.

[33]  Miltos Tsiantis,et al.  A developmental framework for dissected leaf formation in the Arabidopsis relative Cardamine hirsuta , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[34]  F. Turck,et al.  Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[35]  Heinz Saedler,et al.  The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis , 2008, Plant Molecular Biology.

[36]  S. G. Stephens The genetic organization of leaf-shape development in the genusGossypium , 1944, Journal of Genetics.

[37]  E. Finnegan,et al.  Vernalization-Induced Trimethylation of Histone H3 Lysine 27 at FLC Is Not Maintained in Mitotically Quiescent Cells , 2007, Current Biology.

[38]  Naama Menda,et al.  Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Miltos Tsiantis,et al.  The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsuta , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[40]  R. Amasino,et al.  Epigenetic maintenance of the vernalized state in Arabidopsis thaliana requires LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[41]  C. Vincent,et al.  The transcription factor FLC confers a flowering response to vernalization by repressing meristem competence and systemic signaling in Arabidopsis. , 2006, Genes & development.

[42]  M. Schmid,et al.  Diversity of Flowering Responses in Wild Arabidopsis thaliana Strains , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[43]  R. Amasino,et al.  Analysis of naturally occurring late flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1993, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[44]  T. Mizuno,et al.  Autoregulatory expression of the Escherichia coli hns gene encoding a nucleoid protein: H-NS functions as a repressor of its own transcription , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[45]  Hao Wu,et al.  R/qtl: QTL Mapping in Experimental Crosses , 2003, Bioinform..

[46]  W. Peacock,et al.  Different Regulatory Regions Are Required for the Vernalization-Induced Repression of FLOWERING LOCUS C and for the Epigenetic Maintenance of Repression Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.004564. , 2002, The Plant Cell Online.

[47]  N. Sinha,et al.  Homologies in Leaf Form Inferred from KNOXI Gene Expression During Development , 2002, Science.

[48]  C. Helliwell,et al.  Control of flowering time by FLC orthologues in Brassica napus. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[49]  R. Amasino,et al.  FLOWERING LOCUS C Encodes a Novel MADS Domain Protein That Acts as a Repressor of Flowering , 1999, Plant Cell.

[50]  M. Koornneef,et al.  Natural allelic variation at seed size loci in relation to other life history traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Norman MacLeod,et al.  Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis , 1999, Paleobiology.

[52]  P. Goldsbrough,et al.  Heterogeneous inbred family (HIF) analysis: a method for developing near-isogenic lines that differ at quantitative trait loci , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[53]  R. Poethig,et al.  Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1997, Development.

[54]  S. Tanksley,et al.  QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. , 1993, Genetics.

[55]  S. Gould,et al.  Ontogeny and Phylogeny , 1978 .

[56]  Ralph Roskies,et al.  Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[57]  E. Njoku STUDIES IN THE MORPHOGENESIS OF LEAVES , 1956 .

[58]  E. Ashby,et al.  STUDIES IN THE MORPHOGENESIS OF LEAVES , 1951 .

[59]  E. Ashby STUDIES IN THE MORPHOGENESIS OF LEAVES. I. AN ESSAY ON LEAF SHAPE , 1948 .

[60]  K. Goebel Organography of plants, especially of the archegoniatae and spermaphyta, ed. by Isaac Bayley Balfour. , 1900 .