The Use of Informer Sets in Screening: Perspectives on an Efficient Strategy to Identify New Probes

Small-molecule discovery typically involves large-scale screening campaigns, spanning multiple compound collections. However, such activities can be cost- or time-prohibitive, especially when using complex assay systems, limiting the number of compounds tested. Further, low hit rates can make the process inefficient. Sparse coverage of chemical structure or biological activity space can lead to limited success in a primary screen and represents a missed opportunity by virtue of selecting the “wrong” compounds to test. Thus, the choice of screening collections becomes of paramount importance. In this perspective, we discuss the utility of generating “informer sets” for small-molecule discovery, and how this strategy can be leveraged to prioritize probe candidates. While many researchers may assume that informer sets are focused on particular targets (e.g., kinases) or processes (e.g., autophagy), efforts to assemble informer sets based on historical bioactivity or successful human exposure (e.g., repurposing collections) have shown promise as well. Another method for generating informer sets is based on chemical structure, particularly when the compounds have unknown activities and targets. We describe our efforts to screen an informer set representing a collection of 100,000 small molecules synthesized through diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS). This process enables researchers to identify activity early and more extensively screen only a few chemical scaffolds, rather than the entire collection. This elegant and economic outcome is a goal of the informer set approach. Here, we aim not only to shed light on this process, but also to promote the use of informer sets more widely in small-molecule discovery projects.

[1]  I. Pavlinov,et al.  Multiple Chemical Features Impact Biological Performance Diversity of a Highly Active Natural Product‐Inspired Library , 2020, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[2]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Recent achievements and current trajectories of diversity-oriented synthesis. , 2020, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[3]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  Fr-PPIChem: An academic compound library dedicated to protein-protein interactions. , 2020, ACS chemical biology.

[4]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Systematic Chemogenetic Library Assembly , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  David R. Liu,et al.  A High-Throughput Platform to Identify Small-Molecule Inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas9 , 2019, Cell.

[6]  David R. Liu,et al.  Substrate-selective inhibitors that reprogram the activity of insulin-degrading enzyme , 2019, Nature Chemical Biology.

[7]  Hans Briem,et al.  An approach towards enhancement of a screening library: The Next Generation Library Initiative (NGLI) at Bayer - against all odds? , 2019, Drug discovery today.

[8]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  Andrew I. Su,et al.  The ReFRAME library as a comprehensive drug repurposing library and its application to the treatment of cryptosporidiosis , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Douglas B Kell,et al.  Analysing and Navigating Natural Products Space for Generating Small, Diverse, But Representative Chemical Libraries , 2018, Biotechnology journal.

[11]  Jacob K. Asiedu,et al.  The Drug Repurposing Hub: a next-generation drug library and information resource , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[12]  Lyn H. Jones,et al.  Applications of chemogenomic library screening in drug discovery , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Data-Driven Derivation of an "Informer Compound Set" for Improved Selection of Active Compounds in High-Throughput Screening , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  Bruce K. Hua,et al.  Real-Time Biological Annotation of Synthetic Compounds , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  Manuel Llinás,et al.  Open Source Drug Discovery with the Malaria Box Compound Collection for Neglected Diseases and Beyond , 2016, PLoS pathogens.

[16]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Shelby K Doyle,et al.  Advances in discovering small molecules to probe protein function in a systems context. , 2015, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[18]  Joshua A. Bittker,et al.  Harnessing Connectivity in a Large-Scale Small-Molecule Sensitivity Dataset. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[19]  M. Disney,et al.  Studying a Drug-like, RNA-Focused Small Molecule Library Identifies Compounds That Inhibit RNA Toxicity in Myotonic Dystrophy. , 2015, ACS chemical biology.

[20]  Andrew L Hopkins,et al.  The Joint European Compound Library: boosting precompetitive research. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[21]  Dragos Horvath,et al.  Design of a General‐Purpose European Compound Screening Library for EU‐OPENSCREEN , 2014, ChemMedChem.

[22]  Philippe Roche,et al.  Focused chemical libraries--design and enrichment: an example of protein-protein interaction chemical space. , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.

[23]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Toward performance-diverse small-molecule libraries for cell-based phenotypic screening using multiplexed high-dimensional profiling , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Anne Mai Wassermann,et al.  Composition and applications of focus libraries to phenotypic assays , 2014, Front. Pharmacol..

[25]  David R. Liu,et al.  Anti-diabetic activity of insulin-degrading enzyme inhibitors mediated by multiple hormones , 2014, Nature.

[26]  Nicole E. Bodycombe,et al.  Connecting Small Molecules with Similar Assay Performance Profiles Leads to New Biological Hypotheses , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[27]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Multiplex Cytological Profiling Assay to Measure Diverse Cellular States , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  P. Jeffrey Conn,et al.  Bringing together the academic drug discovery community , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  Joshua C. Gilbert,et al.  An Interactive Resource to Identify Cancer Genetic and Lineage Dependencies Targeted by Small Molecules , 2013, Cell.

[30]  P. Nordlund,et al.  Monitoring Drug Target Engagement in Cells and Tissues Using the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay , 2013, Science.

[31]  Noel Southall,et al.  Selecting, Acquiring, and Using Small Molecule Libraries for High‐Throughput Screening , 2012, Current protocols in chemical biology.

[32]  Giovanni Muncipinto,et al.  Synthesis and profiling of a diverse collection of azetidine-based scaffolds for the development of CNS-focused lead-like libraries. , 2012, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[33]  Peter S. Kutchukian,et al.  Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity. , 2012, ACS chemical biology.

[34]  Ruth Brenk,et al.  Mining the ChEMBL Database: An Efficient Chemoinformatics Workflow for Assembling an Ion Channel-Focused Screening Library , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[35]  Patrick W. Faloon,et al.  Synthesis of a novel suppressor of beta-cell apoptosis via diversity-oriented synthesis. , 2011, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[36]  Dana Pe'er,et al.  Modulatory profiling identifies mechanisms of small molecule-induced cell death , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Sivaraman Dandapani,et al.  Current strategies for diversity-oriented synthesis. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[38]  Hugo O Villar,et al.  Design of chemical libraries for screening , 2009, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[39]  Jörg Rademann,et al.  Design of chemical libraries with potentially bioactive molecules applying a maximum common substructure concept , 2009, Molecular Diversity.

[40]  Anang A Shelat,et al.  Scaffold composition and biological relevance of screening libraries. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[41]  David R Spring,et al.  Enriching chemical space with diversity-oriented synthesis. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[42]  A. Fliri,et al.  Biological spectra analysis: Linking biological activity profiles to molecular structure. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. , 2000, Science.

[44]  Nicholas A. Clark,et al.  Cheminformatics Tools for Analyzing and Designing Optimized Small-Molecule Collections and Libraries. , 2019, Cell chemical biology.

[45]  E. Sharlow Benefits of Strategic Small-Scale Targeted Screening. , 2016, Assay and drug development technologies.