Availability of genetically modified feed ingredient: investigations of ingested foreign DNA in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

Foreign DNA fragments from genetically modified defatted soybean meal (GM SEM) in rainbow trout was traced by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and located by in situ hybridization. Either a GM or non-GM SBM formulated diet (42% protein) was fed to fish (average weight 50.5 g) for 2 weeks. The degradation results showed that the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (220 bp) fragment was detected in the contents of digestive system only in fish fed the GM SBM diet, and it was not detected on the third day after changing the diet to the non-GM SBM diet. For the possible transferal results, the promoter fragment was detected in the leukocyte, head kidney and muscle only of fish fed the GM SBM diet; it was not detected on the fifth day after changing the diet to the non-GM SBM diet. These results suggest that a foreign DNA fragment was not completely degraded and might be taken up into organs through the gastrointestinal tract. However, foreign DNA was not detected after the withdrawal period. Thus, the data show that uptake of DNA from GM SBM might not remain in the tissues of fish fed GM SBM diet.

[1]  I. Hirono,et al.  Availability of genetically modified soybean meal in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss diets , 2006, Fisheries Science.

[2]  K. G. Berdal,et al.  Persistence and distribution of intravenously injected DNA in blood and organs of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) , 2006 .

[3]  A. Marocco,et al.  Assessing the Transfer of Genetically Modified DNA from Feed to Animal Tissues , 2005, Transgenic Research.

[4]  R. Mazza,et al.  Effect of Bt corn on broiler growth performance and fate of feed-derived DNA in the digestive tract. , 2005, Poultry science.

[5]  J. Kittilson,et al.  Isolation, characterization, and distribution of two cDNAs encoding for growth hormone receptor in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). , 2005, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[6]  K. G. Berdal,et al.  Dietary DNA in blood and organs of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) , 2005 .

[7]  G. Dill,et al.  Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status and future. , 2005, Pest management science.

[8]  L. Meile,et al.  Bt176 corn in poultry nutrition: physiological characteristics and fate of recombinant plant DNA in chickens. , 2005, Poultry science.

[9]  M. Sanden,et al.  The fate of transgenic sequences present in genetically modified plant products in fish feed, investigating the survival of GM soybean DNA fragments during feeding trials in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L , 2004 .

[10]  M. Yoshioka,et al.  Fate of maize intrinsic and recombinant genes in calves fed genetically modified maize Bt11. , 2004, Journal of food protection.

[11]  W. Doerfler,et al.  Ingested foreign (phage M13) DNA survives transiently in the gastrointestinal tract and enters the bloodstream of mice , 1994, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[12]  R. Phipps,et al.  Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood, and feces of lactating dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  D. Renz,et al.  The gastrointestinal tract as the portal of entry for foreign macromolecules: fate of DNA and proteins , 2003, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[14]  M. Schauzu,et al.  Safety assessment of BT 176 Maize in broiler nutrition: Degradation of Maize-DNA and its metabolic fate , 2003, Archiv fur Tierernahrung.

[15]  T. Reuter,et al.  Investigations on genetically modified maize (Bt-maize) in pig nutrition: fate of feed-ingested foreign DNA in pig bodies , 2003 .

[16]  A. Hino,et al.  Detection of genetically modified maize DNA fragments in the intestinal contents of pigs fed StarLink CBH351. , 2003, Veterinary and human toxicology.

[17]  R. Einspanier,et al.  Degradation and possible carry over of feed DNA monitored in pigs and poultry , 2002 .

[18]  R. D. Coffey,et al.  Soybean meal from roundup ready or conventional soybeans in diets for growing-finishing swine. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[19]  J. Heritage,et al.  The fate of antibiotic resistance marker genes in transgenic plant feed material fed to chickens. , 2002, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[20]  W. Doerfler,et al.  On the fate of plant or other foreign genes upon the uptake in food or after intramuscular injection in mice , 2001, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[21]  R. Einspanier,et al.  The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: a collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material , 2001 .

[22]  G. Blair,et al.  DNA stability in plant tissues: implications for the possible transfer of genes from genetically modified food , 2000, FEBS letters.

[23]  C. Kemp,et al.  Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series B: Livestock Feeds and Feeding Safety issues associated with the DNA in animal feed derived from genetically modified crops. A review of scientific and regulatory procedures , 2000 .

[24]  Ø. Evensen,et al.  The morphology of the immune system in teleost fishes , 1999 .

[25]  H. Akiyama,et al.  A detection method for recombinant DNA from genetically modified soybeans and processed foods containing them , 1999 .

[26]  T. Gjøen,et al.  A role for scavenger receptors in phagocytosis of protein-coated particles in rainbow trout head kidney macrophages. , 1998, Developmental and comparative immunology.

[27]  D. Renz,et al.  On the fate of orally ingested foreign DNA in mice: chromosomal association and placental transmission to the fetus , 1998, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[28]  D. Renz,et al.  Foreign (M13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes, spleen, and liver via the intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. Raz,et al.  Immunostimulatory DNA Sequences Necessary for Effective Intradermal Gene Immunization , 1996, Science.

[30]  J. MacDonald,et al.  The composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean seeds is equivalent to that of conventional soybeans. , 1996, The Journal of nutrition.

[31]  G. Hartnell,et al.  The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance. , 1996, The Journal of nutrition.

[32]  Ganesh M. Kishore,et al.  Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line , 1995 .

[33]  Shirley A. Miller,et al.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[35]  W. F. Thompson,et al.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  E. Streicher,et al.  THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER OF FISH. , 1965, Experimental neurology.