Residue management practices and planter attachments for corn production in a conservation agriculture system

Seed placement and failure to establish a uniform plant stand are critical problems associated with production of corn (Zea mays) following wheat (Triticum aestivum) in a conservation agriculture system in Iran. Our objectives were to evaluate the performance of a corn row- crop planter equipped with two planter attachments (smooth/toothed coulters) at six wheat residue management systems (three tillage systems and two levels of surface residue) at two forward speeds of 5 and 7 km h-1. Residue retained after planting, seeding depth, emergence rate index (ERI) and seed spacing indices were determined. The baled residue plots tilled by chisel plow followed by disc harrow (BRCD) resulted in minimum residue after planting as compared to other residue treatments. Furthermore, the maximum values of the ERI and uniformity of plant spacing pertained to this treatment. Other results showed that the ERI increased up to 18% for the toothed coulter as compared to the smooth coulter. The toothed coulter also established a deeper seed placement as compared to the smooth coulter. Planting at forward speed of 5 km h-1 resulted in deeper seeding depth as compared to a forward speed of 7 km h-1. However, lower values of miss and precision indices were obtained at forward speed of 7 km h-1, indicating a more uniformity of plant spacing. Results of this study showed that equipping the conventional planter with toothed coulter and planting in soil prepared under the BRCD residue management system can result in a satisfactory conservation crop production system.

[1]  Paulo Sérgio Graziano Magalhães,et al.  Simulated and Experimental Analyses of a Toothed Rolling Coulter for Cutting Crop Residues , 2007 .

[2]  Paulo Sérgio Graziano Magalhães,et al.  Evaluation of coulters for cutting sugar cane residue in a soil bin , 2008 .

[3]  M. H. Raoufat,et al.  Row cleaners enhance reduced tillage planting of corn in Iran , 2007 .

[4]  M. H. Raoufat,et al.  Row-crop planter attachments in a conservation tillage system: A comparative study , 2008 .

[5]  Donald C. Erbach,et al.  Tillage for Continuous Corn and Corn-Soybean Rotation , 1982 .

[6]  W. H. Paulson,et al.  Surface Residue and In-Row Treatment Effects on Long-Term No-Tillage Continuous Corn , 1994 .

[7]  D. A. Crutchfield,et al.  Influence of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Straw Mulch and Metolachlor on Corn (Zea mays) Growth and Yield , 1994, Weed Science.

[8]  J. Hanway How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[9]  Edward McKyes,et al.  Soil Cutting and Tillage , 1986 .

[10]  M. H. Raoufat,et al.  STAND ESTABLISHMENT RESPONSES OF MAIZE TO SEEDBED RESIDUE, SEED DRILL COULTERS AND PRIMARY TILLAGE SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[11]  R. L. Kushwaha,et al.  Soil Bin Evaluation of Disc Coulters Under No-Till Crop Residue Conditions , 1986 .

[12]  S. D. Kachman,et al.  Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering , 1995 .

[13]  N. Morris,et al.  The adoption of non-inversion tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment—A review , 2010 .