Influence of wind velocity and wind direction on measurements of spray drift potential of boom sprayers using drift test bench

In 2009, the European Directive for a Sustainable Use of Pesticides (128/2009/CE) established important mandatory actions to be accomplished by all Member States (MS) in the European Union. The main objective is to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides by reducing their risks and impacts on human health and the environment. Among other important actions, drift reduction measures are essential to avoid the entry of plant protection products (PPP) in water or other undesirable areas. As the risk of environmental contamination is directly related to the spray application technology, there is a strong need for objective methods for drift evaluation as well as robust procedures for the classification of sprayers according to their risk of contamination. For this purpose, and as a complementary tool to actual drift measurement methodologies in the field or in laboratory conditions, a new method has been proposed for the quantification of the potential drift generated by horizontal boom sprayer systems using an ad hoc test bench. This study aims to evaluate the influence of wind velocity and wind direction on the drift potential value (DPV) using the proposed methodology and test bench. The results indicated that wind velocities below 1.0 m s-1 have a negligible influence on the DPV. Front wind led to higher DPVs than lateral wind. A global analysis of data indicates that the proposed methodology and test bench are interesting tools for the quick and objective evaluation of the potential drift if used in appropriate environmental conditions.

[1]  Olivier Briand,et al.  Field experiments for the evaluation of pesticide spray-drift on arable crops. , 2005, Pest management science.

[2]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Spray drift of drift reducing nozzle types spraying a bare soil surface with a boom sprayer , 2014 .

[3]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  A Method for Assessing Drift Potential of a Citrus Herbicide Applicator , 2011 .

[4]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Classification of spray applications for driftability, to protect surface water , 2000 .

[5]  P. G. Andersen,et al.  Determination of drift potential of different flat fan nozzles on a boom sprayer using a test bench , 2014 .

[6]  S. Bailey,et al.  Buffer zones to improve water quality: a review of their potential use in UK agriculture , 1993 .

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  D. Nuyttens,et al.  Comparison between drift test bench results and other drift assessment techniques. , 2014 .

[9]  P. Balsari,et al.  A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk , 2007 .

[10]  Adrian Kelsey,et al.  Field experiments to assess approaches for spray drift incident investigation. , 2009, Pest management science.

[11]  P. C. H. Miller,et al.  Field and Wind Tunnel Measurements of the Airborne Spray Volume Downwind of Single Flat-Fan Nozzles , 1999 .

[12]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Environmentally Optimised Sprayer (EOS)--A software application for comprehensive assessment of environmental safety features of sprayers. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Spray drift measurements to evaluate the Belgian drift mitigation measures in field crops , 2008 .

[14]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Experimental study of factors influencing the risk of drift from field sprayers, Part 2: Spray application technique , 2006 .

[15]  L. Bergström,et al.  Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors. , 2011, Pest management science.

[16]  N. H. Spliid,et al.  Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift). , 2006, Chemosphere.