EdTech in humanitarian contexts: whose evidence base?

This study reports on the design and development of a methodological toolbox prototype for evaluating EdTech deployed in the contexts of fragility and crisis. The project adopted a bottom-up approach: training EdTech users in participatory action research approaches was followed by a comprehensive mapping of problems in the Azraq refugee camp that might be addressed through the chosen EdTech installed in a local Makerspace. Students as researchers used a developmental evaluation approach to deepen their understanding of evaluation as a concept and as a process and proceeded to match the results of their Azraq camp problem-tree analysis with evaluation questions related to the EdTech tools available in the Makerspace. The study concludes with a proposed methodological toolbox prototype, a set of approaches and processes that include research capacity building in fragile contexts, and user-led evaluation that emphasizes the notion of evaluation as a learning process driven by those designed to benefit from EdTech in fragile contexts.

[1]  Matthew Schmidt,et al.  Usability research in educational technology: a state-of-the-art systematic review , 2022, Educational technology research and development.

[2]  João Pedro Azevedo,et al.  Remote Learning During COVID-19 , 2021 .

[3]  Daniel Rodriguez-Segura EdTech in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence , 2021, The World Bank Research Observer.

[4]  D. Haelewaters,et al.  Ten simple rules for Global North researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the Global South , 2021, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Carola Hieker,et al.  What the EdTech Experience in Refugee Camps Can Teach Us in Times of School Closure. Blended Learning, Modular and Mobile Programs Are Key to Keeping Disadvantaged Learners in Education , 2021, Challenges.

[6]  Barbara Moser-Mercer,et al.  Ethics‐in‐practice in fragile contexts: Research in education for displaced persons, refugees and asylum seekers , 2020, British Educational Research Journal.

[7]  Claudio Cesar Silva de Freitas,et al.  A Mobile Educational Lab Kit for Fragile Contexts , 2019, 2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC).

[8]  Sandra G. Kouritzin,et al.  Toward a non-extractive research ethics for transcultural, translingual research: perspectives from the coloniser and the colonised , 2018 .

[9]  K. R. Priya Grounded Theory Methodology , 2013 .

[10]  Phil Brown,et al.  Reflexive Research Ethics for Environmental Health and Justice: Academics and Movement Building , 2012, Social movement studies.

[11]  L. Jack,et al.  Ethics and Community-Based Participatory Research: Perspectives From the Field , 2010, Health promotion practice.

[12]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .