An auditory Brain-Computer Interface with Accuracy Prediction

Fully auditory Brain-computer interfaces based on the dichotic listening task (DL-BCIs) are suited for users unable to do any muscular movement, which includes gazing, exploration or coordination of their eyes looking for inputs in form of feedback, stimulation or visual support. However, one of their disadvantages, in contrast with the visual BCIs, is their lower performance that makes them not adequate in applications that require a high accuracy. To overcome this disadvantage, we employed a Bayesian approach in which the DL-BCI was modeled as a Binary phase shift keying receiver for which the accuracy can be estimated a priori as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio. The results showed the measured accuracy to match the predefined target accuracy, thus validating this model that made possible to estimate in advance the classification accuracy on a trial-by-trial basis. This constitutes a novel methodology in the design of fully auditory DL-BCIs that let us first, define the target accuracy for a specific application and second, classify when the signal-to-noise ratio guarantees that target accuracy.

[1]  D. McFarland,et al.  An auditory brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  A Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  José R. Álvarez,et al.  Bio-inspired Modeling of Cognitive Tasks, Second International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation, IWINAC 2007, La Manga del Mar Menor, Spain, June 18-21, 2007, Proceedings, Part I , 2007, IWINAC.

[5]  Kim Dremstrup,et al.  Auditory and spatial navigation imagery in Brain–Computer Interface using optimized wavelets , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  New diagnostic EEG markers of the Alzheimer’s disease using visibility graph , 2010, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[7]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  R. J. Roberts,et al.  Dichotic listening: expanded norms and clinical application. , 2002, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[9]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  CHAPTER 17 – Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication in Paralysed Patients and Implications for Disorders of Consciousness , 2009 .

[10]  M. Nuttin,et al.  A brain-actuated wheelchair: Asynchronous and non-invasive Brain–computer interfaces for continuous control of robots , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Panagiotis Patrinos,et al.  Variable Selection in Nonlinear Modeling Based on RBF Networks and Evolutionary Computation , 2010, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[12]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[13]  Kouji Takano,et al.  My thoughts through a robot's eyes: An augmented reality-brain–machine interface , 2010, Neuroscience Research.

[14]  Alireza Fatehi,et al.  Flexible Structure Multiple Modeling Using Irregular Self-Organizing Maps Neural Network , 2008, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[15]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[18]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Does the ‘P300’ speller depend on eye gaze? , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Brain–computer interface using water-based electrodes , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Use of Kohonen Maps as Feature Selector for Selective Attention Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IWINAC.

[21]  X Li,et al.  Fuzzy Regression Modeling for Tool Performance Prediction and Degradation Detection , 2010, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[22]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  The Influence of Psychological State and Motivation on Brain–Computer Interface Performance in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis – a Longitudinal Study , 2010, Front. Neuropharma..

[23]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Yoshiro Okubo,et al.  Cerebral activation associated with speech sound discrimination during the diotic listening task: An fMRI study , 2010, Neuroscience Research.

[25]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain–computer interfacing to mental state monitoring , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Thilo Hinterberger,et al.  An Auditory Brain-Computer Interface Based on the Self-Regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[29]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[30]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Analysis of sensorimotor rhythms for the implementation of a brain switch for healthy subjects , 2010, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[31]  Jochen Einbeck,et al.  Data Compression and Regression through Local Principal Curves and Surfaces , 2010, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[32]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  A Wavelet-Chaos Methodology for Analysis of EEGs and EEG Subbands to Detect Seizure and Epilepsy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Ricardo Ron-Angevin,et al.  Brain–computer interface: Changes in performance using virtual reality techniques , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Fuzzy Synchronization Likelihood with Application to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[35]  B. Scholkopf,et al.  Attention modulation of auditory event-related potentials in a brain-computer interface , 2004, IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2004..

[36]  Masato Fukuda,et al.  Brain electric activity for active inhibition of auditory irrelevant information , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  C. Neuper,et al.  Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  ICA and Committee Machine-Based Algorithm for Cursor Control in a BCI System , 2005, ISNN.

[39]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A BCI-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled. , 2003, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[40]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  2009 Special Issue: The MindGame: A P300-based brain-computer interface game , 2009 .

[42]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Beta rebound after different types of motor imagery in man , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[44]  Alberto Prieto,et al.  Use of Phase in Brain–Computer Interfaces based on Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2010, Neural Processing Letters.

[45]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[46]  H. Davis,et al.  Enhancement of Evoked Cortical Potentials in Humans Related to a Task Requiring a Decision , 1964, Science.

[47]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[48]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[49]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[50]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball brain–computer interface for binary choices , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[51]  YANG YANG,et al.  Protein Subcellular Multi-Localization Prediction Using a Min-Max Modular Support Vector Machine , 2010, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[52]  Rafal Scherer,et al.  Designing Boosting Ensemble of Relational Fuzzy Systems , 2010, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[53]  B. Allison,et al.  BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[54]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Selective attention and evoked potentials inhumans — A critical review , 1975, Biological Psychology.

[55]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  A brain–computer interface tool to assess cognitive functions in completely paralyzed patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[56]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Brain oscillations during semantic evaluation of speech , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[57]  Edward J. Golob,et al.  Neural activity before and after conscious perception in dichotic listening , 2010, Neuropsychologia.