Seismic performance analysis of PBL gusset connections in buckling-restrained braced RC frames

Abstract The implementation of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) in new reinforced concrete frames (RCFs) is more susceptible to the complex gusset connection between BRBs and the framing members. In this paper, a novel gusset connection with the L-shape perfobond strip (PBL) group was proposed to ease the installation and exhibit more reliable BRB-to-RC joints in new BRB-RCFs. Finite element (FE) monotonic pushover analysis was conducted to investigate the mechanical property of the L-shape PBL group, in terms of the effect of the gusset plate thickness, PBL arrangement and transverse rebars. An empirical formula was suggested for the optimal PBL gusset plate thickness. To gain insights into the seismic performance of the application of the PBL gusset connection in BRB-RCFs, the BRB-RCF subassemblage FE model was constructed and verified by the full-scale test. The analysis results showed that the BRB-RCF subassemblage exhibited a full hysteretic curve and more than 60% of energy was dissipated by the BRB. The gusset connection basically remained in the elastic stage and no significant damage could be observed even at 3% interstory drift ratio (IDR), which indicated that the proposed connection was effective.

[1]  Weiwei Lin,et al.  Parametric study on shear capacity of circular-hole and long-hole perfobond shear connector , 2016 .

[2]  Shoichi Kishiki,et al.  Subassemblage Cyclic Loading Tests of Buckling-Restrained Braced RC Frames with Unconstrained Gusset Connections , 2016 .

[3]  Shoichi Kishiki,et al.  Seismic responses of reinforced concrete frames with buckling restrained braces in zigzag configuration , 2015 .

[4]  H.-P. Andrä,et al.  Neues, vorteilhaftes Verbundmittel für Stahlverbund‐Tragwerke mit hoher Dauerfestigkeit. , 1987 .

[5]  Zhan Wang,et al.  Effect of gusset connection configurations on frame–gusset interaction in steel buckling‐restrained braced frame , 2019, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.

[6]  Larry S. Muir Designing Compact Gussets with the Uniform Force Method , 2008 .

[7]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Cyclic Testing of a Buckling Restrained Braced Frame with Unconstrained Gusset Connections , 2009 .

[8]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Frame and Brace Action Forces on Steel Corner Gusset Plate Connections in Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2012 .

[9]  Lin Sun,et al.  Experimental research and cyclic behavior of buckling-restrained braced composite frame , 2014 .

[10]  Alessandro Zona,et al.  Seismic performance of dual systems coupling moment‐resisting and buckling‐restrained braced frames , 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[11]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND DESIGN OF STRUCTURES WITH BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES , 2004 .

[12]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Seismic retrofitting with buckling restrained braces: Application to an existing non-ductile RC framed building , 2010 .

[13]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic design and test of gusset connections for buckling‐restrained braced frames , 2014 .

[14]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Bidirectional substructure pseudo‐dynamic tests and analysis of a full‐scale two‐story buckling‐restrained braced frame , 2016 .

[15]  Guo-Qiang Li,et al.  Study of the Anchorage Connections for Buckling Restrained Braces Part 1: Experimental Investigation , 2013 .

[16]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system , 2006 .

[17]  Mahdi Shariati,et al.  Various types of shear connectors in composite structures: A review , 2012 .

[18]  Jhon Alexander Segura Mateus,et al.  Buckling-restrained brace using round steel bar cores restrained by inner round steel tubes and outer square steel tube , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[19]  Cheol-Ho Lee,et al.  Seismic Design of Rib-Reinforced Steel Moment Connections based on Equivalent Strut Model , 2002 .

[21]  Pejman Alanjari,et al.  Experimental optimization studies on steel core lengths in buckling restrained braces , 2011 .

[22]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Experimental Performance of Steel Braced Frames Subjected to Bidirectional Loading , 2013 .

[24]  Jin Hee Ahn,et al.  Shear resistance of the perfobond-rib shear connector depending on concrete strength and rib arrangement , 2010 .

[25]  M. Yam,et al.  High-strength steel frames with SMA connections in self-centring energy-dissipation bays: insights and a multimodal nonlinear static procedure , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[26]  Ming-Chieh Chuang,et al.  Seismic design and experiment of single and coupled corner gusset connections in a full‐scale two‐story buckling‐restrained braced frame , 2015 .

[27]  Guo-Qiang Li,et al.  Study of the Anchorage Connections for Buckling Restrained Braces Part 2: Theoretical Study , 2013 .

[28]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[29]  Xu-hong Zhou,et al.  Push-out test of large perfobond connectors in steel–concrete joints of hybrid bridges , 2018, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[30]  Zhongya Zhang,et al.  Shear behavior of perfobond connectors in the steel-concrete joints of hybrid bridges , 2020 .

[31]  Qiao Li,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Internal Force Transfer Mechanism of Perfobond Rib Shear Connector Group , 2017 .