Geographic relevance

Purpose – The purpose of this paper concerns the dimensions of relevance in information retrieval systems and their completeness in new retrieval contexts such as mobile search. Geography as a factor in relevance is little understood and information seeking is assumed to take place in indoor environments. Yet the rise of information seeking on the move using mobile devices implies the need to better understand the kind of situational relevance operating in this kind of context. Design/methodology/approach – The paper outlines and explores a geographic information seeking process in which geographic information needs (conditioned by needs and tasks, in context) drive the acquisition and use of geographic information objects, which in turn influence geographic behaviour in the environment. Geographic relevance is defined as “a relation between a geographic information need” (like an attention span) and “the spatio-temporal expression of the geographic information objects needed to satisfy it” (like an area of influence). Some empirical examples are given to indicate the theoretical and practical application of this work. Findings – The paper sets out definitions of geographical information needs based on cognitive and geographic criteria, and proposes four canonical cases, which might be theorised as anomalous states of geographic knowledge (ASGK). The paper argues that geographic relevance is best defined as a spatio-temporally extended relation between information need (an “attention” span) and geographic information object (a zone of “influence”), and it defines four domains of geographic relevance. Finally a model of geographic relevance is suggested in which attention and influence are modelled as map layers whose intersection can define the nature of the relation. Originality/value – Geographic relevance is a new field of research that has so far been poorly defined and little researched. This paper sets out new principles for the study of geographic information behaviour.

[1]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Users in Context , 2000, ESSIR.

[2]  M. Dodge,et al.  Mapping Cyberspace , 2000 .

[3]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .

[4]  B. Dervin,et al.  Information needs and uses. , 1986 .

[5]  David J. Unwin,et al.  Defining and Delineating the Central Areas of Towns for Statistical Monitoring Using Continuous Surface Representations , 2000, Trans. GIS.

[6]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[7]  Jonathan Raper Design constraints on operational LBS , 2007, Location Based Services and TeleCartography.

[8]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[9]  David Nicholas,et al.  Mobile phones : the new information medium? , 2000 .

[10]  Linda Schamber,et al.  Users' Criteria for Evaluation in a Multimedia Environment. , 1991 .

[11]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Explanation in Information Seeking and Retrieval , 2005 .

[12]  Pertti Vakkari Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval , 1999 .

[13]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  K. Popper Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[15]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  How many relevances in information retrieval? , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[16]  Barry Smith,et al.  Truth and the visual field , 1999 .

[17]  Mário J. Silva,et al.  Adding geographic scopes to web resources , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[18]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine , 1996 .

[19]  Andrew J. May,et al.  Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[20]  Paolo Coppola,et al.  The Concept of Relevance in Mobile and Ubiquitous Information Access , 2003, Mobile HCI Workshop on Mobile and Ubiquitous Information Access.

[21]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[22]  Jason Dykes,et al.  A framework for evaluating geographical information , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Georg Gartner,et al.  A critical evaluation of location based services and their potential , 2007, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[24]  E. Soja Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other Real-and-Imagined Places , 1996 .

[25]  Tumasch Reichenbacher,et al.  The concept of relevance in mobile maps , 2007, Location Based Services and TeleCartography.

[26]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information Foraging , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[27]  Peiling Wang A cognitive model of document selection of real users of information retrieval systems , 1994 .

[28]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  GIS : a computing perspective , 2004 .

[29]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Understanding and modelling built environments for mobile guide interface design , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[30]  B. Tversky,et al.  Perspective in Spatial Descriptions , 1996 .

[31]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[32]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology , 1993 .

[33]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  What's special about spatial?: database requirements for vehicle navigation in geographic space , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[34]  M. Gluck Making Sense of Human Wayfinding: Review of Cognitive and Linguistic Knowledge for Personal Navigation with a New Research Direction , 1991 .

[35]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Dimensions of relevance , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[36]  L. Anselin What is Special About Spatial Data? Alternative Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis (89-4) , 1989 .

[37]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Situational relevance , 1973, Inf. Storage Retr..

[38]  Stefano Mizzaro Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .

[39]  Olof Sundin,et al.  The Instrumentality of Information Needs and Relevance , 2005, CoLIS.

[40]  David K. Allen,et al.  Spreading the load: mobile information and communications technologies and their effect on information overload , 2005, Inf. Res..

[41]  S. P. Harter Psychological relevance and information science , 1992 .

[42]  Jonathan Raper,et al.  Multidimensional geographic information science , 2000 .

[43]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research , 2003, Inf. Res..

[44]  Colleen Cool The Concept of Situation in Information Science. , 2001 .

[45]  Steven Rosendale,et al.  The Fate of Place: a Philosophical History , 1999 .

[46]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Human conceptions of spaces: Implications for GIS , 1997 .

[47]  Thomas D. Wilson,et al.  Human Information Behavior , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[48]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Information Concepts for Information Science , 1978, J. Documentation.

[49]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[50]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[51]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Code and the Transduction of Space , 2005 .

[52]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  On user studies and information needs , 2006, J. Documentation.