Gas–solid flow behaviour prediction for sand in bypass pneumatic conveying with conventional frictional-kinetic model

Abstract Bypass pneumatic conveying is an alternative way to convey material which does not have dense phase transport capability. The computational fluid dynamics based commercial software Fluent 6.3 is used to investigate the pressure drop as well as the gas–solid flow behaviour in a bypass pneumatic conveying system. The conveyed material was sand with a mean particle size of 378 µm and the solid loading ratio was in the range of 10–123. The conventional frictional-kinetic model combining frictional and kinetic stresses simultaneously was applied for pressure drop prediction. The simulation results were then compared with experimental results from bypass pneumatic conveying tests. Selected image results from the computational fluid dynamics simulations were utilised and compared with images captured from high speed camera. In addition, a test case with low air mass flow rate and high solid loading ratio 82.49 was chosen as an example to show detailed gas–solid flow behaviour in the simulation of highly dense flows. It was found that conventional frictional-kinetic model with modified packing limit and friction packing limit has greatly improved the pressure drop prediction result compared with kinetic theory without friction. The detailed analysis for the selected test case showed how the full bore dune formation and deformation of sand and bypass flutes interact. High amplitude fluctuations and variation in pressure and gas velocity were observed. The gas velocity vectors indicate a high degree of air penetration from the flute into the bypass pipe. This behaviour provides an aeration mechanism which is what makes the bypass system work and allows non-dense phase material to be conveyed in a dense mode of flow.

[1]  Yu Zhang,et al.  CFD analysis of pneumatic conveying in a double-tube-socket (DTS®) pipe , 2010 .

[2]  Kenneth C. Williams,et al.  Predicting the mode of flow in pneumatic conveying systems—A review ☆ , 2008 .

[3]  T. G. Cowling,et al.  The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases , 1939 .

[4]  Ying Wang,et al.  Pressure drop prediction with a modified frictional-kinetic model for alumina in bypass pneumatic conveying system , 2016 .

[5]  Madhumita B. Ray,et al.  Pneumatic transport of granular materials through a 90° bend , 2004 .

[6]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[7]  David G. Schaeffer,et al.  Instability in the evolution equations describing incompressible granular flow , 1987 .

[8]  Sankaran Sundaresan,et al.  Gas-particle flow in vertical pipes with high mass loading of particles , 1998 .

[9]  Changsui Zhao,et al.  Numerical simulation on dense phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal in horizontal pipe at high pressure , 2010 .

[10]  Jiemin Zhou,et al.  Numerical simulation study on sensitivity of pressure drop predicting in pneumatic transport with various settings , 2009 .

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Frictional–collisional constitutive relations for granular materials, with application to plane shearing , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  van den Cm Bleek,et al.  Eulerian simulations of bubbling behaviour in gas-solid fluidised beds , 1998 .

[13]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Numerical simulation of the fluid dynamics of a freely bubbling fluidized bed: influence of the air supply system , 2002 .

[14]  F. Taghipour,et al.  Experimental and computational study of gas¿solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[15]  D. Gidaspow Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions , 1994 .

[16]  Jiemin Zhou,et al.  Numerical study on pressure prediction and its main influence factors in pneumatic conveyors , 2010 .

[17]  Andrew Cowell,et al.  CFD investigation of dense phase pneumatic conveying at a pipeline enlargement , 2012 .

[18]  David J. Jeffrey,et al.  The stress tensor in a granular flow at high shear rates , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  D. Gidaspow,et al.  Hydrodynamics of binary fluidization in a riser : CFD simulation using two granular temperatures , 2003 .

[20]  John R. Pugh,et al.  Bend Pressure Drop Predictions Using the Euler-Euler Model in Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying , 2007 .

[21]  S. Ogawa,et al.  On the equations of fully fluidized granular materials , 1980 .

[22]  Andrew Cowell,et al.  CFD visualisation of pneumatic conveying passive by-pass line , 2008 .

[23]  Dimitri Gidaspow,et al.  Computation of flow patterns in circulating fluidized beds , 1990 .

[24]  Yan Du,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on power consumptions in a double-tube-socket pneumatic conveying system , 2010 .

[25]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Dimitri Gidaspow,et al.  Hydrodynamic simulation of gas-solid flow in a riser using kinetic theory of granular flow , 2003 .