Homeostatic and Nonhomeostatic Modulation of Learning in Human Motor Cortex

Motor learning is important throughout life for acquisition and adjustment of motor skill. The extent of motor learning may be modulated by the history of motor cortex activity, but little is known which metaplasticity rule (homeostatic vs nonhomeostatic) governs this interaction. Here, we explored in nine healthy adults the effects of three different paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocols on subsequent learning of rapid thumb flexion movements. PAS resulted in either a long-term potentiation (LTP)-like increase in excitability of the stimulated motor cortex (PASLTP), or a long-term depression (LTD)-like decrease (PASLTD), or no change (control condition, PASCON). Learning was indexed by the increase in peak acceleration of the trained movement. Delays of 0 and 90 min between PAS and motor practice were tested. At the 0 min delay, PASLTD strongly facilitated motor learning (homeostatic interaction), and PASLTP also facilitated learning, although to a lesser extent (nonhomeostatic interaction). At the 90 min delay, PASLTD facilitated learning, whereas PASLTP depressed learning (interactions both homeostatic). Therefore, facilitation of learning by previous brain stimulation occurs primarily and most effectively through homeostatic interactions, but at the 0 min delay, nonhomeostatic mechanisms such as LTP-induced blockade of LTD and nonsaturated LTP-induced facilitation of learning might also play a role. The present findings demonstrate that motor learning in humans can be modulated by noninvasive brain stimulation and suggest the possibility of enhancing motor relearning in defined neurological patients.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Limited impact of homeostatic plasticity on motor learning in humans , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Joseph Classen,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi116 Temporary Occlusion of Associative Motor Cortical Plasticity by Prior Dynamic Motor Training , 2005 .

[4]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  J. L. Taylor,et al.  The effect of voluntary contraction on cortico‐cortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. Johnston,et al.  Active dendrites, potassium channels and synaptic plasticity. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  C. A. Castro,et al.  Recovery of spatial learning deficits after decay of electrically induced synaptic enhancement in the hippocampus , 1989, Nature.

[9]  T. Berger Long-term potentiation of hippocampal synaptic transmission affects rate of behavioral learning. , 1984, Science.

[10]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Bidirectional long‐term motor cortical plasticity and metaplasticity induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Malinow,et al.  NMDA Receptor Subunit Composition Controls Synaptic Plasticity by Regulating Binding to CaMKII , 2005, Neuron.

[12]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Movement parameters and neural activity in motor cortex and area 5. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  D. Ruge,et al.  Learning Modifies Subsequent Induction of Long-Term Potentiation-Like and Long-Term Depression-Like Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Agnès Gruart,et al.  Differential Effects of Long-Term Potentiation Evoked at the CA3–CA1 Synapse before, during, and after the Acquisition of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning in Behaving Mice , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Deafferentation of neighbouring motor cortex areas does not further enhance saturated practice-dependent plasticity in healthy adults , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Timing-Dependent Modulation of Associative Plasticity by General Network Excitability in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Spiess,et al.  Priming of Long-Term Potentiation in Mouse Hippocampus by Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Acute Stress: Implications for Hippocampus-Dependent Learning , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Lisman,et al.  The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  L. Cohen,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[24]  G. Collingridge,et al.  LTP Inhibits LTD in the Hippocampus via Regulation of GSK3β , 2007, Neuron.

[25]  S. Nelson,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  P. Mazzone,et al.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  E. Wassermann,et al.  Priming Stimulation Enhances the Depressant Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  U. Ziemann Improving disability in stroke with RTMS , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[29]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[30]  H. Freund,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by intraneural microstimulation of afferent nerve fibers. , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[31]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity of Neural Circuits , 2004, Neuron.

[32]  John C Rothwell,et al.  Differential Modulation of Motor Cortical Plasticity and Excitability in Early and Late Phases of Human Motor Learning , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[34]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[36]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate and timing in cortical synaptic plasticity. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[37]  A. Berardelli,et al.  Effects of 5 Hz subthreshold magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex on fast finger movements in normal subjects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  TMS and drugs , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  Mark F. Bear,et al.  Heterosynaptic metaplasticity in the hippocampus in vivo: A BCM-like modifiable threshold for LTP , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  R. Lemon,et al.  State of the art: Physiology of transcranial motor cortex stimulation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  E. Wassermann,et al.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  T. Bliss,et al.  Plasticity in the human central nervous system. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  J. L. Taylor,et al.  Mechanisms of motor‐evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of spinal cord excitability by subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[47]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Prior state of cortical activity influences subsequent practicing of a visuomotor coordination task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  J. Hell,et al.  Activity-driven postsynaptic translocation of CaMKII. , 2005, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[49]  K. Stefan,et al.  Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  G. Teskey,et al.  Skilled-learning-induced potentiation in rat sensorimotor cortex: a transient form of behavioural long-term potentiation , 2004, Neuroscience.

[51]  S. Nakamura,et al.  Pyramidal tract control over cutaneous and kinesthetic sensory transmission in the cat thalamus , 1975, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[54]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  Agnès Gruart,et al.  Involvement of the CA3–CA1 Synapse in the Acquisition of Associative Learning in Behaving Mice , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  J. Sanes Neocortical mechanisms in motor learning , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke , 2005, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[58]  R. Malenka,et al.  The influence of prior synaptic activity on the induction of long-term potentiation. , 1992, Science.

[59]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[60]  John Rothwell,et al.  Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[61]  S. Goldring,et al.  Comparative study of sensory input to motor cortex in animals and man. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[62]  M. Hallett,et al.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex , 2002, Nature.

[63]  R. Morris,et al.  Impaired spatial learning after saturation of long-term potentiation. , 1998, Science.

[64]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity and learning in human motor cortex--investigations with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). , 2006, Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology.

[65]  M. Bear,et al.  Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[66]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  Homeostatic plasticity in human motor cortex demonstrated by two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[67]  K. Sakai,et al.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. , 2000, Science.

[69]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[70]  R. Morris,et al.  Cumulative long‐term potentiation in the rat dentate gyrus correlates with, but does not modify, performance in the water maze , 1993, Hippocampus.

[71]  Mark F. Bear,et al.  Obligatory Role of NR2A for Metaplasticity in Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[72]  Alfredo Berardelli,et al.  Effects of intermittent theta‐burst stimulation on practice‐related changes in fast finger movements in healthy subjects , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[73]  M. Hallett,et al.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[74]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[75]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Associative plasticity in human motor cortex during voluntary muscle contraction. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[77]  L. Cohen,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.