Quantitative kinetic analysis of the bacteriophage λ genetic network

The lysis–lysogeny decision of bacteriophage λ has been a paradigm for a developmental genetic network, which is composed of interlocked positive and negative feedback loops. This genetic network is capable of responding to environmental signals and to the number of infecting phages. An interplay between CI and Cro functions suggested a bistable switch model for the lysis–lysogeny decision. Here, we present a real-time picture of the execution of lytic and lysogenic pathways with unprecedented temporal resolution. We monitor, in vivo, both the level and function of the CII and Q gene regulators. These activators are cotranscribed yet control opposite developmental pathways. Conditions that favor the lysogenic response show severe delay and down-regulation of Q activity, in both CII-dependent and CII-independent ways. Whereas CII activity correlates with its protein level, Q shows a pronounced threshold before its function is observed. Our quantitative analyses suggest that by regulating CII and CIII, Cro plays a key role in the ability of the λ genetic network to sense the difference between one and more than one phage particles infecting a cell. Thus, our results provide an improved framework to explain the longstanding puzzle of the decision process.

[1]  A. Oppenheim,et al.  Recruitment of host ATP-dependent proteases by bacteriophage lambda. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  A Genetic Switch, Phage Lambda Revisited , 2004 .

[3]  D. Court,et al.  In vivo recombineering of bacteriophage λ by PCR fragments and single-strand oligonucleotides , 2004 .

[4]  L. Hood,et al.  Calculating biological behaviors of epigenetic states in the phage λ life cycle , 2004, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[5]  A. Campbell The future of bacteriophage biology , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  W. Jacobs,et al.  Origins of Highly Mosaic Mycobacteriophage Genomes , 2003, Cell.

[7]  V. Turk,et al.  Viral Abundance and a High Proportion of Lysogens Suggest That Viruses Are Important Members of the Microbial Community in the Gulf of Trieste , 2003, Microbial Ecology.

[8]  D. Court,et al.  The phage λ CII transcriptional activator carries a C-terminal domain signaling for rapid proteolysis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  U. Alon,et al.  Assigning numbers to the arrows: Parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Livny,et al.  Bacteriophage control of Shiga toxin 1 production and release by Escherichia coli , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  Restructuring of an RNA polymerase holoenzyme elongation complex by lambdoid phage Q proteins , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D. Court,et al.  Bacteriophage lambda: alive and well and still doing its thing. , 2001, Current opinion in microbiology.

[13]  S. Altuvia,et al.  Characterization of Escherichia coli DNA Lesions Generated within J774 Macrophages , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  K. Wommack,et al.  Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems , 2000, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[15]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[16]  H. McAdams,et al.  Circuit simulation of genetic networks. , 1995, Science.

[17]  O. Miller,et al.  rRNA transcription rate in Escherichia coli , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  D Kornitzer,et al.  The activity of the CIII regulator of lambdoid bacteriophages resides within a 24-amino acid protein domain. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  N. Costantino,et al.  Analysis of mutations in the ninR region of bacteriophage lambda that bypass a requirement for lambda N antitermination , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  J. Roberts,et al.  Transcription antitermination by phage lambda gene Q protein requires a DNA segment spanning the RNA start site. , 1987, Genes & development.

[21]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  Characterization of a third, cII-dependent, coordinately activated promoter on phage lambda involved in lysogenic development. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  B. Hoopes,et al.  A cII-dependent promoter is located within the Q gene of bacteriophage lambda. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D Court,et al.  On the nature of cis-acting regulatory proteins and genetic organization in bacteriophage: the example of gene Q of bacteriophage lambda. , 1976, Genetics.

[24]  L. Reichardt,et al.  Control of bacteriophage lambda repressor synthesis after phage infection: the role of the N, cII, cIII and cro products. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  P. Kourilsky,et al.  Lysogenization by bacteriophage lambda. III. Multiplicity dependent phenomena occuring upon infection by lambda. , 1975, Biochimie.

[26]  A. D. Kaiser,et al.  Control of λ Repressor Synthesis , 1971 .

[27]  François Jacob,et al.  Regulation of Repressor Expression in λ , 1970 .

[28]  A. D. Kaiser Mutations in a temperate bacteriophage affecting its ability to lysogenize Escherichia coli. , 1957, Virology.