Development of a retrobulbar injection technique for ocular surgery and analgesia in dogs.

OBJECTIVE To develop and compare 3 techniques for retrobulbar injection of local anesthetic agents for ocular surgery and analgesia in dogs. DESIGN Prospective study. ANIMALS 17 dogs (including 9 cadavers). PROCEDURES Inferior-temporal palpebral (ITP), perimandibular, and combined superior-inferior peribulbar injection techniques were compared by assessing the distribution of latex after injection into the orbits of 5 canine cadavers; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of the distribution of contrast agent after injection in the retrobulbar space of 4 canine cadavers; and assessment of the efficacy and MRI evaluation of the anatomic distribution of injections of a lidocainecontrast agent mixture in 4 anesthetized, nonrecovery dogs. By use of the preferred technique (ITP), the ocular effects of lidocaine anesthesia were evaluated in 4 dogs; during a 2-week period after treatment, dogs underwent ophthalmic examination, Schirmer tear testing (STT), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry. RESULTS Of the 3 techniques, the ITP technique was the preferred method for retrobulbar administration of anesthetic agent in dogs because it was efficacious (pupil dilation and central rotation of the globe achieved in all eyes), easiest to perform, and provided thorough coverage of the intraconal retrobulbar space without complication. During the 2-week follow-up period, the ITP injection did not significantly affect STT, IOP, or Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry values in dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In dogs, retrobulbar administration of anesthetic agents via the ITP technique is a potential alternative to systemic administration of neuromuscular blocking agents for ophthalmic surgery and provides the additional benefit of local ocular analgesia.

[1]  R. McMurphy,et al.  Effects of atracurium on intraocular pressure, eye position, and blood pressure in eucapnic and hypocapnic isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. , 2004, American journal of veterinary research.

[2]  E. Irving,et al.  Effect of retrobulbar injection of lidocaine on saccadic velocities , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  S. Pearce,et al.  Comparison of the retrobulbar and Peterson nerve block techniques via magnetic resonance imaging in bovine cadavers. , 2003, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[4]  R. Wall Respiratory acid-base disorders. , 2001, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[5]  D. Friedman,et al.  Synthesis of the literature on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia for cataract surgery. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[6]  P. I. Gus,et al.  Visual‐evoked potentials: Assessment of retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  R. Edge,et al.  Scleral perforation during retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia: risk factors and outcome in 50,000 consecutive injections. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  P. Hellyer,et al.  Respiratory depressant and skeletal muscle relaxant effects of low-dose pancuronium bromide in spontaneously breathing, isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[9]  P. Shriver,et al.  Prospective study of the effectiveness of retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia for anterior segment surgery , 1992, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  M. Raffe,et al.  Retrobulbar Block in Combination with General Anesthesia for Equine Ophthalmic Surgery , 1986 .

[11]  D. Brunson Anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery. , 1980, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[12]  D. Slatter Intraocular pressure during retrobulbar injection. , 1978, Australian veterinary journal.

[13]  D. Lampard,et al.  Intra-ocular pressure during retrobulbar injection. , 1977, Australian veterinary journal.