Measuring Religious Attitudes in Secularized Western European Context: A Psychometric Analysis of the Post-Critical Belief Scale

Wulff's two-dimensional model of approaches to religion was an inspiration for the development of the Post-Critical Belief Scale (PCBS), an instrument measuring religious attitudes, that is, “paradigms of religious belief structure” in a secularized Western European context. The scale has been frequently used in psychological studies, has undergone psychometric analyses and modifications, and has been translated into several languages. The current study shows results of a psychometric analysis of the component structure of PCBS in different age groups over time using Clusterwise Simultaneous Component Analysis-Equal Cross-Product (SCA-ECP). The analysis was based on samples collected in Flanders (Belgium; N = 14,599). The one-cluster and two-cluster models yielded three components: Literal Affirmation, Literal Disaffirmation, and Symbolic Attitude, and there were no differences between age groups. In the two-cluster model, subtle differences between samples collected before and after 2002 were found, and these were related to two PCBS items referring to interpretation of Biblical stories. Our finding of a generalized Symbolic Attitude might be related to the changes in the approaches to religion in secularized Western Europe, and might capture the religious (dis-)belief of individuals who are open and tolerant to other religious systems, or alternatively, have become indifferent to them. Further cross-cultural and longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the religious attitudes in a secularized context, and the development of a new scale based on the paradigm of personal meaning systems is suggested

[1]  David Voas The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe , 2008 .

[2]  H. Kaiser The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[3]  D. Wulff The Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Views , 1991 .

[4]  D. Green,et al.  Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  B. Duriez,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO THE POST-CRITICAL BELIEF SCALE: INTERNAL STRUCTURE AND EXTERNAL RELATIONSHIPS , 2007, Psyke & Logos.

[6]  A. Basilevsky,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[7]  Vassilis Saroglou,et al.  Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging , 2011 .

[8]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[9]  B. Soenens,et al.  Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale , 2005 .

[10]  L. Boeve God Interrupts History: Theology in a Time of Upheaval , 2007 .

[11]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[12]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  Modeling Differences in the Dimensionality of Multiblock Data by Means of Clusterwise Simultaneous Component Analysis , 2013, Psychometrika.

[13]  J. Dezutter,et al.  Meaning making: A crucial psychological process in the confrontation with a life stressor , 2013 .

[14]  M. Cugmas,et al.  On comparing partitions , 2015 .

[15]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  How to perform multiblock component analysis in practice , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[16]  D. Hutsebaut Post-Critical Belief a New Approach To the Religious Attitude Problem1 , 1996 .

[17]  D. Sörbom A GENERAL METHOD FOR STUDYING DIFFERENCES IN FACTOR MEANS AND FACTOR STRUCTURE BETWEEN GROUPS , 1974 .

[18]  B. Duriez,et al.  Psycho-Epistemological Styles and Religious Beliefs , 1999 .

[19]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[20]  L. Tucker A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[21]  Detlef Pollack Religious Change in Europe: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings , 2008 .

[22]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[23]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[24]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Three-way component analysis: principles and illustrative application. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[25]  S. Aupers,et al.  The Spiritual Turn and the Decline of Tradition: The Spread of Post‐Christian Spirituality in 14 Western Countries, 1981–2000 , 2007 .

[26]  B. Zarzycka,et al.  The selective relationship between religious dimensions and social desirability among Polish students , 2011 .

[27]  B. Duriez,et al.  A further elaboration of the post-critical belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in Flanders-Belgium , 2000 .

[28]  J. Bouwens,et al.  Framing the identity of Catholic schools: empirical methodology for quantitative research on the Catholic identity of an education institute , 2010 .

[29]  D. Hutsebaut Identity Statuses, Ego-Integration, God Representationand Religious Cognitive Styles , 1997 .

[30]  J. Fontaine,et al.  The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale , 2003 .

[31]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Is Religiosity Related to Better Parenting? , 2009 .

[32]  W. Meredith Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[33]  R. Kline Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[34]  Arnold G. Fisch,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY , 1990 .

[35]  G. Davie Believing without Belonging: Is This the Future of Religion in Britain? , 1990 .

[36]  D. Jackson,et al.  A Comparison Of Component And Factor Patterns: A Monte Carlo Approach. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[37]  K. Jöreskog Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations , 1971 .

[38]  Inge Sieben,et al.  About the European Values Study , 2013 .

[39]  J. Berge,et al.  Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. , 2006 .

[40]  B. Duriez,et al.  The German Post-Critical Belief Scale: Internal and External Validity , 2003 .

[41]  Marieke E. Timmerman,et al.  Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences , 2003 .

[42]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis for analyzing structural differences in multivariate multiblock data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[43]  D. Green,et al.  Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  F. Chen Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[45]  K. G. J8reskoC,et al.  Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations , 2007 .

[46]  D. Wulff Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary, 2nd ed. , 1997 .

[47]  T. Martos,et al.  Religious doubts and mental health in adolescence and young adulthood: the association with religious attitudes. , 2011, Journal of adolescence.

[48]  Charles Reagan Wilson,et al.  The philosophy of Paul Ricœur : an anthology of his work , 1978 .