All Buildings Great and Small

This is a review article of experiments on architectural design review. The experiments included more than 500 respondents and more than 400 environmental scenes. The article describes how psychophysical experiments have been used to conduct architectural design reviews. Findings include estimates of how well various media simulate actual environments, how different respondent samples affect preference results, and how well different design review processes predict public preferences. Suggestions are made regarding how science can be used in design review and what research questions appear to be ripe for additional inquiry.

[1]  A E Stamps,et al.  Validating Contextual Urban Design Photoprotocols: Replication and Generalization from Single Residences to Block Faces , 1993 .

[2]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Public Preferences for High Rise Buildings: Stylistic and Demographic Effects , 1991 .

[3]  K. B. Madsen,et al.  Pleasure, reward, preference : their nature, determinants, and role in behavior , 1973 .

[4]  Use of comparative choice paradigm in governmental design review: a case study , 1991 .

[5]  M J Gardner,et al.  An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. , 1990, JAMA.

[6]  Arthur Stamps,et al.  Advocacy Membership, Design Guidelines, and Predicting Preferences for Residential Infill Designs , 1993 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[8]  Harold J. McWhinnie,et al.  Psychology and the Visual Arts , 1970 .

[9]  Arthur E. Stamps Comparing Preferences of Neighbors and a Neighborhood Design Review Board , 1991 .

[10]  A. Stamps Use of Photographs to Simulate Environments: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  W. Edwards Deming Sample design in business research , 1960 .

[12]  A. Stamps Simulation Effects on Environmental Preference , 1993 .

[13]  A. Stamps Are environmental aesthetics worth studying , 1989 .

[14]  Arthur E. Stamps Preliminary Findings regarding Effects of Photographic and Stimulus Variables on Preferences for Environmental Scenes , 1990 .

[15]  L. V. Jones,et al.  The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. , 1970 .

[16]  I. Chalmers,et al.  A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials. , 1990, JAMA.

[17]  A. Stamps Perceptual and Preferential Effects of Photomontage Simulations of Environments , 1992 .

[18]  R Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[19]  J. Nasar,et al.  The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same , 1989 .

[20]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .