A review on the use of action research in information systems studies

This paper examines the use of action research in information systems (IS) studies reported in literature over the last twenty-five years. Thirty such field studies and discussion papers on information technology, system design/use or socio-technical systems were reviewed and compared with those from social science. Evolving patterns are noted among these IS studies in terms of their underlying assumptions, study designs and presentation styles. A contemporary IS action research framework is proposed as a conceptual foundation and practical guide for researchers and practitioners interested in action research for IS studies. Its implications in IS research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[2]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Organizational Change and Innovation: Psychological Perspectives and Practices in Europe , 1992 .

[4]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Self-Design for High Involvement: A Large-Scale Organizational Change , 1993 .

[5]  Oǵuz N. Babüroǵlu,et al.  Normative Action Research , 1992 .

[6]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Prototype systems for accounting, information and control , 1978 .

[7]  Calvin Pava,et al.  Redesigning Sociotechnical Systems Design: Concepts and Methods for the 1990s , 1986 .

[8]  David Fryer,et al.  The development of computer applications by non‐employed people in community settings* , 1988 .

[9]  Morten Levin,et al.  Creating Networks for Rural Economic Development in Norway , 1993 .

[10]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Accounting systems in organisational contexts: A case for critical theory , 1987 .

[11]  R. W. Revans.  ACTION LEARNING: Its Terms and Character , 1983 .

[12]  Christian De Cock.  In Search of a New Epistemology , 1994 .

[13]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[14]  John S. Oakland.  Production management and high technology in the United Kingdom , 1986 .

[15]  R. Tandon,et al.  Ideology and Political Economy in Inquiry: Action Research and Participatory Research , 1983 .

[16]  Allen S. Lee.  A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[17]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[18]  Max Elden,et al.  Features of Emerging Action Research , 1993 .

[19]  Stephen R. Acker,et al.  Information System Design: A Case Study in the Generation of Innovations. , 1987 .

[20]  Evelyn Blennerhassett.  RESEARCH REPORT: MANAGEMENT LEARNING GROUPS — A LESSON IN ACTION , 1988 .

[21]  Stephen F. Jablonsky,et al.  Traditional and emergent theories of budgeting: An empirical analysis , 1985 .

[22]  L. David Brown,et al.  Social Change Through Collective Reflection with Asian Nongovernmental Development Organizations , 1993 .

[23]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[24]  Viviane M. J. Robinson,et al.  The Origins and Status of Action Research , 1984 .

[25]  T Timpka,et al.  The pragmatics of clinical hypermedia: experiences from 5 years of participatory design in the MEDEA project. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[26]  Philip H. Mirvis,et al.  Systems are not solutions: Issues in creating information systems that account for the human organization , 1983 .

[27]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[28]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Overcoming Obstacles to University and Industry Synergy in Information System Education: Lessons from Action Research. , 1991 .

[29]  B. K. Chesterton.  Implementing Operations Research/Management Science , 1976 .

[30]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[31]  D. B. Candlin,et al.  Managing the Introduction of Expert Systems , 1992 .

[32]  R. Revans.  Action Learning: New Techniques for Management , 1980 .

[33]  Richard Badham,et al.  Getting Smart: Developing an Action Research Approach to the Integrated Management of Technical and Organizational Innovation , 1995 .

[34]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Developing end-users' systems development competence: An exploratory study , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[35]  R. W. Revans,et al.  ACTION LEARNING The Skills of Diagnosis , 1983 .

[36]  M. El-den,et al.  Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1993 .

[37]  lain L. Mangham.  Conspiracies of Silence? Some Critical Comments on the Action Research Special Issue, February 1993 , 1993 .

[38]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Looking Backward and Forward at Action Research , 1993 .

[40]  W. M. Fox.  Sociotechnical System Principles and Guidelines: Past and Present , 1995 .

[41]  Rolf Solli,et al.  'Accounting talk' in a caring setting , 1993 .

[42]  Jean M. Bartunekl.  Scholarly Dialogues and Participatory Action Research , 1993 .

[43]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Swedish Network Development for Implementing National Work Reform Strategy , 1993 .

[44]  Viviane M. J. Robinson.  Current Controversies in Action Research , 1993 .

[45]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[46]  R. W. Revans.  Action Learning: Kindling the Touch Paper , 1983 .

[47]  R. McTaggart.  Principles for Participatory Action Research , 1991 .

[48]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared , 1989 .

[49]  Bengt Stymne,et al.  Organization Design for Technological Change , 1990 .

[50]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[51]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Action Learning for Teaching Information Systems , 1983, Computer/law journal.

[52]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[53]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[54]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal , 1993 .

[55]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[56]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[57]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[58]  Peter Reasonl,et al.  Sitting Between Appreciation and Disappointment: A Critique of the Special Edition of Human Relations on Action Research , 1993 .

[59]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[60]  Tudor Rickards.  Making new things happen: an interpretation of observed innovation strategies , 1985 .

[61]  Frank Heller,et al.  Another Look at Action Research , 1993 .

[62]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[63]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  MIS research strategies , 1982, Inf. Manag..

[64]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Life with a sub-contractor: New technology and management accounting , 1988 .

[65]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[66]  R. Harris,et al.  Improving Patient Satisfaction through Action Research , 1978 .

[67]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Judging Qualitative Research in Information Systems: Criteria for Accepting and Rejecting Manuscripts , 1995, ICIS.

[68]  Mikko Ruohonen,et al.  Aligning DSS development with organization development , 1992 .

[69]  Harold G. Levine,et al.  Diagnosing the Human Threats to Information Technology Implementation: A Missing Factor in Systems Analysis Illustrated in a Case Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[71]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies , 1987, CACM.

[72]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Action Research and the Generation of Knowledge , 1993 .