Concomitant Immunosuppressive Therapy Use in Eculizumab-Treated Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis During the REGAIN Open-Label Extension Study

Introduction: Chronic, broad-spectrum immunosuppressive therapy (IST) can be associated with side effects in many people with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), and treatment guidelines recommend that the IST dose be tapered once patients achieve a stable treatment response. We therefore examined IST use in eculizumab-treated patients with refractory gMG. Methods: The REGAIN open-label extension (OLE) enrolled 117 adults with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive gMG who had completed the 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study of eculizumab. Eligible patients had received ≥2 ISTs for ≥1 year or ≥1 IST with intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange ≥4 times in 1 year, without symptom control. During REGAIN, changes in concomitant MG therapies were not permitted; during the OLE, they were permitted at the investigators' discretion. Participants received eculizumab 1,200 mg every 2 weeks for up to 4 years; concomitant prednisone and related corticosteroids (PRED), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use was recorded. Changes in MG Activities of Daily Living and Quantitative MG total scores, MG exacerbations, and adverse events were also recorded. Results: At last OLE assessment, 88.0% (103/117) of participants were using ≥1 IST vs. 98.3% (115/117) at OLE baseline. During the OLE, 76.9% (90/117) of patients experienced a total of 719 IST changes. Almost half of participants [48.7% (57/117)] stopped or decreased ≥1 IST owing to MG symptom improvement, representing 38.9% (280/719) of all changes. In patients who decreased and/or stopped ≥1 IST, mean daily doses of PRED, AZA, and MMF decreased between OLE baseline and last assessment by 60.8% [standard deviation (SD), 28.07; P < 0.0001], 89.1% (SD, 25.77; P < 0.0001), and 56.0% (SD, 32.99; P < 0.0001), respectively. Improved clinical outcomes were observed with eculizumab regardless of IST changes during the OLE, and eculizumab's safety profile was similar in patients who used PRED, AZA, and MMF. Conclusions: Use of ISTs by patients with previously refractory gMG decreased during eculizumab treatment in the REGAIN OLE. Clinical improvements with eculizumab were maintained by patients in all groups, including those who decreased and/or stopped concomitant ISTs. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01997229, NCT02301624.

[1]  H. Wiendl,et al.  Post-intervention Status in Patients With Refractory Myasthenia Gravis Treated With Eculizumab During REGAIN and Its Open-Label Extension , 2020, Neurology.

[2]  E. Ciafaloni,et al.  Myasthenia gravis patient and physician opinions about immunosuppressant reduction , 2020, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  N. Hattori,et al.  Suitable indications of eculizumab for patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis , 2020, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[4]  M. Benatar,et al.  Long‐term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis , 2019, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  H. Haller,et al.  Eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: 10‐year pharmacovigilance analysis , 2019, British journal of haematology.

[6]  M. Freimer Faculty Opinions recommendation of Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. , 2018, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[7]  M. Benatar,et al.  International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis , 2016, Neurology.

[8]  J. Verschuuren,et al.  An up-date on health-related quality of life in myasthenia gravis -results from population based cohorts , 2015, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[9]  F. Piehl,et al.  The autoimmune spectrum of myasthenia gravis: a Swedish population‐based study , 2015, Journal of internal medicine.

[10]  G. Remuzzi,et al.  Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome from 2-year extensions of phase 2 studies , 2015, Kidney international.

[11]  G. Wolfe,et al.  Treatment-Refractory Myasthenia Gravis , 2014, Journal of clinical neuromuscular disease.

[12]  G. Remuzzi,et al.  Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis Patients , 2013, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[14]  G. Ardissino,et al.  Eculizumab for Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Recurrence in Renal Transplantation , 2012, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[15]  A. Vincent Acetylcholine receptor antibody as a diagnostic test for myasthenia gravis: results in 153 validated cases and 2967 diagnostic assays , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[16]  S. Sathasivam Current and emerging treatments for the management of myasthenia gravis , 2011, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[17]  D. Sanders,et al.  Immunosuppressive therapies in myasthenia gravis , 2010, Autoimmunity.

[18]  Monica Milani,et al.  Myasthenia gravis: past, present, and future. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  N. Young,et al.  The complement inhibitor eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  P. Karachunski,et al.  Absence of IFN-γ or IL-12 Has Different Effects on Experimental Myasthenia Gravis in C57BL/6 Mice1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[21]  J. Lindstrom,et al.  Antibody to acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis: Prevalence, clinical correlates, and diagnostic value , 2011, Neurology.

[22]  A. Vincent,et al.  Soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1) protects against experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis , 1996, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[23]  F. Somnier,et al.  Clinical implementation of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  R. Bradley,et al.  Diagnostic sensitivity of the laboratory tests in myasthenia gravis , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[25]  G. Biesecker,et al.  Inhibition of acute passive transfer experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis with Fab antibody to complement C6. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[26]  P. Christadoss C5 gene influences the development of murine myasthenia gravis. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[27]  D. Pareyson,et al.  Anti AChR antibody: Relevance to diagnosis and clinical aspects of myasthenia gravis , 1988, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[28]  A. Vincent,et al.  Acetylcholine receptor antibody as a diagnostic test for myasthenia gravis: results in 153 validated cases and 2967 diagnostic assays. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[29]  A. Engel,et al.  Ultrastructural Aspects of Acetylcholine Receptor Turnover at the Normal End‐plate and in Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis , 1982, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[30]  J. Lindstrom,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies as probes of acetylcholine receptor structure. 2. Binding to native receptor. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[31]  J. Lindstrom,et al.  Antibody to acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis , 1976, Neurology.

[32]  Antonio Pflüger,et al.  Executive Summary. , 2012, Journal of the ICRU.

[33]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.