NON-INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY Original Studies Clinical Utility of Coronary CT Angiography: Coronary Stenosis Detection and Prognosis in Ambulatory Patients

Introduction: Multislice CT coronary angiography (MSCTA) accurately detects stenosis in patients undergoing coronary arteriography, but its accuracy in clinical outpatients is less certain. This study retrospectively analyzed MSCTA performance in a large outpatient cohort and examined 6-month clinical follow-up in those without invasive CA. Methods: Patients underwent MSCTA for clinical indications including symptoms or noninvasive results being either equivocal or suspected as incorrect by referring clinicians. Standard 16-slice CT scanner techniques were used, and results were analyzed on the basis of both patient and vessel. Patients were treated medically or sent to invasive angiography on the basis of MSCTA results and judgment of referring clinicians. All invasive angiograms were analyzed using quantitative coronary angiography. Six-month clinical follow-up was determined in patients without CA. Results: One thousand fifty-three consecutive patients were referred for MSCTA, resulting in 994 interpretable scans. Mean age was 58 6 13 years, 55% were male, 50% had prior noninvasive testing, and 90% had symptoms. Invasive angiography was performed in 160 patients, with significant stenoses present in 69%. MSCTA demonstrated 87% and 89% accuracy by patientand vessel-based analysis, respectively, and was most accurate in the left main and right coronary arteries. Only two patients not referred for angiography had signficant stenosis in those undergoing 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: MSCTA accurately detects obstructive coronary stenosis in clinical patients with possible cardiac symptoms, and effectively triages them for invasive angiography. Negative results are highly accurate in ruling out obstructive disease. Six-month prognosis is excellent in patients without significant disease determined by MSCT. ' 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

[1]  Rintaro Inoue,et al.  Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Mehta,et al.  Evaluation of Venous and Arterial Conduit Patency by 16-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2004, Circulation.

[5]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Predictive Value of 16-Slice Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: Patient- Versus Segment-Based Analysis , 2004, Circulation.

[6]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  V. Fuster,et al.  In Vivo 16-Slice, Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Experimental Atherosclerosis: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathology , 2004, Circulation.

[8]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Reliability of Differentiating Human Coronary Plaque Morphology Using Contrast-Enhanced Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography: A Comparison With Histology , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Richard D. White,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multi-detector row CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G. Simonetti,et al.  Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2004, European heart journal.

[12]  C. Claussen,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  W. Bautz,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Thin-Slice Multi-Detector Row Spiral Computed Tomography and Multiplanar Reconstruction , 2003, Circulation.

[15]  J M Simpson,et al.  Efficient study designs to assess the accuracy of screening tests. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  R A Greenes,et al.  Assessment of Diagnostic Technologies: Methodology for Unbiased Estimation from Samples of Selectively Verified Patients , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[17]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  B. Ohnesorge,et al.  CT of coronary artery disease. , 2004, Radiology.

[19]  R A Greenes,et al.  The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic tests. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.