Self-Efficacy and the Digit Ratio in a Group of Sports University Students

Self-efficacy is one’s awareness of being able to cope optimally with different situations. Perceived self-efficacy is a belief that closely involves emotional and personological functioning. In fact, when one perceives oneself as capable, the likelihood of success increases significantly. The aim of this research was to verify a possible correlation between self-efficacy and the Digit Ratio (2D:4D), referred to as prenatal androgen levels, and whether these correlate with some psychological variables, considering possible gender differences. This study involved 56 sports university students, whose 2D:4D ratio was calculated. Moreover, self-assessment questionnaires: the Self-efficacy Scale (SES), the Big Five Questionnaire-2 (BFQ-2), the Profile of Mood State (POMS), the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y) and the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) were administered. The data show that the perceived levels of self-efficacy seem to be influenced by an innate predisposition linked to prenatal androgen values to which the subjects were exposed during uterine life (2D:4D). This negative correlation indicates that the higher the value of the digit ratio, the more likely it is that the level of perceived self-efficacy will be lower. Finally, the degree of perceived self-efficacy also seems to depend on the levels of subjective anxiety, understood both as a personological disposition and a contingent condition, and the latter also seems to be influenced by prenatal androgen levels, particularly in women.

[1]  Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez,et al.  Towards an integrated framework to measure user engagement with interactive or physical products , 2022, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

[2]  Hong Shi.  Inhibition modulated by self-efficacy: An event-related potential study , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  V. Perciavalle,et al.  Cognitive Performances: The Role of Digit Ratio (D2:D4) With a Protective Factor for Anxiety , 2022, Frontiers in Neuroergonomics.

[4]  V. Gallese,et al.  Intrinsic Shapes of Empathy: Functional Brain Network Topology Encodes Intersubjective Experience and Awareness Traits , 2022, Brain sciences.

[5]  J. Smoliga,et al.  Giving science the finger—is the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) a biomarker of good luck? A cross sectional study , 2021, BMJ.

[6]  R. Fabio,et al.  The effects of psychosocial and cognitive stress on executive functions and automatic processes in healthy subjects: A pilot study , 2021, Current Psychology.

[7]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated? , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Coco,et al.  Risk-taking behavior, the second-to-fourth digit ratio and psychological features in a sample of cavers , 2019, PeerJ.

[9]  V. Perciavalle,et al.  Digit ratio, personality and emotions in skydivers. , 2018, Biomedical reports.

[10]  M. Voracek,et al.  Digit Ratio (2D:4D) Predicts Self-Reported Measures of General Competitiveness, but Not Behavior in Economic Experiments , 2017, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[11]  Flávia Teixeira-Silva,et al.  Trait vs. state anxiety in different threatening situations. , 2017, Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy.

[12]  V. Kraaij,et al.  Relationships Between Traumatic Life Events, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies, and Somatic Complaints , 2017, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[13]  M. Petralia,et al.  The second-to-fourth digit ratio correlates with aggressive behavior in professional soccer players , 2013, Molecular medicine reports.

[14]  A. Deak,et al.  Brain and emotion: Cognitive neuroscience of emotions , 2011 .

[15]  J. Manning.  Resolving the role of prenatal sex steroids in the development of digit ratio , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  F. Nicoletti,et al.  The second-to-fourth digit ratio correlates with the rate of academic performance in medical school students. , 2011, Molecular medicine reports.

[17]  James J. Gross,et al.  A Spanish Adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire , 2010 .

[18]  G. Alexander,et al.  Anxiety, Sex-Linked Behaviors, and Digit Ratios (2D:4D) , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[19]  Gerard S. Conway,et al.  Personality and congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Possible effects of prenatal androgen exposure , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[20]  E. Coccaro,et al.  CSF testosterone: relationship to aggression, impulsivity, and venturesomeness in adult males with personality disorder. , 2007, Journal of psychiatric research.

[21]  M. Voracek,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR ASSORTATIVE MATING ON DIGIT RATIO (2D:4D), A BIOMARKER FOR PRENATAL ANDROGEN EXPOSURE , 2007, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[22]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) and adult sex hormone levels: New data and a meta-analytic review , 2007, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[23]  Andrew J. G. Churchill,et al.  The Effects of Sex, Ethnicity, and Sexual Orientation on Self-Measured Digit Ratio (2D:4D) , 2007, Archives of sexual behavior.

[24]  A. Bechara,et al.  The Role of Emotion in Decision Making , 2006 .

[25]  Scott M. Lynch,et al.  Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success in College , 2005 .

[26]  P. Hurd,et al.  Depression in men is associated with more feminine finger length ratios , 2005 .

[27]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[28]  T. Wade,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratios and individual differences in women's self-perceived attractiveness, self-esteem, and body-esteem , 2004 .

[29]  O. John,et al.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health , 2002, Heredity.

[31]  M. S. Singh,et al.  The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[32]  A. Booth,et al.  Primacy of organising effects of testosterone , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  Glen Whyte,et al.  When success breeds failure: the role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action , 1997 .

[34]  Elizabeth Cashdan,et al.  Hormones, Sex, and Status in Women , 1995, Hormones and Behavior.

[35]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills: the role of goals, self-efficacy, and perceived control. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  C. Plato,et al.  Embryological development and prevalence of digital flexion creases , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[37]  M. Sheard,et al.  Plasma Testosterone: Correlation with Aggressive Behavior and Social Dominance in Man , 1974, Psychosomatic medicine.

[38]  R. Rose,et al.  Assessment of Aggressive Behavior and Plasma Testosterone in a Young Criminal Population , 1972, Psychosomatic medicine.

[39]  Keith D. Smith,et al.  Relation of Psychologic Measures of Aggression and Hostility to Testosterone Production in Man , 1971, Psychosomatic medicine.

[40]  I. Setti,et al.  Le differenze individuali , 2016 .

[41]  P. Eachus.  Finger Length, Digit Ratio and Gender Differences in Sensation Seeking and Internet Self-Efficacy , 2007 .

[42]  D. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation , 2002 .

[43]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. , 2000 .

[44]  J. E. Maddux.  Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. , 1995 .

[45]  R. Koopman,et al.  The relationship between self-efficacy and depression in adolescents. , 1991, Adolescence.

[46]  C. Spielberger.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Form Y , 1983 .

[47]  M. Lorr,et al.  Manual for the Profile of Mood States , 1971 .