A Guide to Analyzing Message–Response Sequences and Group Interaction Patterns in Computer‐mediated Communication

This paper proposes a set of methods and a framework for evaluating, modeling, and predicting group interactions in computer‐mediated communication. The method of sequential analysis is described along with specific software tools and techniques to facilitate the analysis of message–response sequences. In addition, the Dialogic Theory and its assumptions are presented to establish a theoretical framework and guide to using sequential analysis in computer‐mediated communication research. Step‐by‐step instructions are presented to illustrate how sequential analysis can be used to measure the way latent variables (e.g., message function, response latency, communication style) and exogenous variables (e.g., gender, discourse rules, context) affect how likely a message is to elicit a response, the types of responses elicited by the message, and whether or not the elicited sequence of responses (e.g., claim → challenge → explain) mirror the processes that support group decision‐making, problem‐solving, and learning.

[1]  Philip Smith.  Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  M. D. Roblyer,et al.  Alternative designs for evaluating computer-based instruction , 1984 .

[3]  Elaine England.  Interactional Analysis: The Missing Factor in Computer-Aided Learning Design and Evaluation. , 1985 .

[4]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Analyzing Interaction: Sequential Analysis with SDIS and GSEQ , 1995 .

[5]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Argument and Decision Making in Computer‐Mediated Groups , 2004 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Creative Controversy: Intellectual Challenge in the Classroom , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: two implementations in higher education , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[8]  Chad S. Carr.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation : Supporting Problem-based Learning in Legal Education , 2001 .

[9]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. , 1999 .

[10]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  A plea for “more local” theories of cooperative learning , 1992 .

[11]  D. Newman.  An Experiment in Group Learning Technology: Evaluating Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer-Supported Seminars. , 1996 .

[12]  José Bidarra,et al.  Current Developments and Best Practice in Open and Distance Learning , 2000 .

[13]  A. DeLongis,et al.  Marital Interactions: Experimental Investigations , 1981 .

[14]  Allan Jeong,et al.  Gender interactions in online debates: Look who's arguing with whom , 2003 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .

[16]  R. Garrison.  Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues , 2000 .

[17]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation , 1999, CSCL.

[19]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[20]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[21]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[22]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Characterizing the Sequential Structure of Interactive Behaviors Through Statistical and Grammatical Techniques , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  P. Coirier,et al.  Foundations of argumentative text processing , 2000 .

[24]  Allan Jeong.  The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online , 2003 .

[25]  Thomas A. Keenan.  Computers and education , 1964, CACM.

[26]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration , 1999, CSCL.