Analysis of Improved Criteria for Mold Growth in ASHRAE Standard 160 by Comparison with Field Observations

ASHRAE Standard 160, Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis in Buildings, was published in 2009. The standard sets criteria for moisture design loads, hygrothermal analysis methods, and satisfactory moisture performance of the building envelope. One of the evaluation criteria specifies conditions necessary to avoid mold growth. The current standard requires that the 30-day running average relative humidity at the material surface be less than 80 % when the 30-day running average surface temperature is between 5 C (41 F) and 40 C (104 F). This criterion was intended to strike a balance between the need for simplicity to make the standard useful and the complex reality of mold growth, which varies with mold species and depends on the type of material, water activity, temperature, and other factors. Since the standard was Manuscript received July 15, 2016; accepted for publication November 1, 2016. USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Building and Fire Sciences, 1 Gifford Pinchot Dr., Madison, WI 53726 CertainTeed Corp., Malvern Innovation Center, 18 Moores Rd., Malvern, PA 19355 Building Science Corp., 70 Main St., Westford, MA 01886 RDH Building Science Laboratories, 167 Lexington Ct., Unit 6, Waterloo, ON, N2J 4R9, Canada ASTM Symposium on Advances in Hygrothermal Performance of Building Envelopes: Materials, Systems and Simulations on October 26–27, 2016 in Orlando, FL. This work is not subject to copyright law. ADVANCES IN HYGROTHERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDING ENVELOPES 1 STP 1599, 2017 / available online at www.astm.org / doi: 10.1520/STP159920160106 published, many practitioners have maintained that the mold criterion is too stringent. Assemblies known to have satisfactory performance in the field do not meet the criterion under hygrothermal simulation. A recent addendum to ASHRAE Standard 160 replaced the simplified mold criterion with a state-ofthe-art empirical model that describes mold growth and decline over time using a mold index. This model takes into account the sensitivity of the material, the surface temperature, and the surface relative humidity. This paper provides an overview of the mold index model and a series of comparisons between field observations of visible mold growth or lack thereof on woodbased sheathing and model predictions that use measured surface temperature and relative humidity values as inputs. The field data are from published studies on above-grade wood-frame wall assemblies and roof assemblies covering a range of climate zones. Our analysis indicates that the current 30-day criterion in ASHRAE Standard 160 fails many assemblies in which visible mold growth did not occur. In contrast, the mold index model predictions give better agreement with observations.

[1]  Christopher Schumacher,et al.  Field Performance of an Unvented Cathedral Ceiling (UCC) in Vancouver , 2007 .

[2]  H. Kaesche Corrosion of Metals , 2003 .

[3]  Christopher James Schumacher Hygrothermal Performance of Insulated, Sloped, Wood-Framed Roof Assemblies , 2008 .

[4]  H. Viitanen,et al.  Mould growth on wood under fluctuating humidity conditions , 1994 .

[5]  J. Lstiburek,et al.  Modeling Enclosure Design in Above-Grade Walls , 2016 .

[6]  K. Ueno,et al.  Monitoring of Double-Stud Wall Moisture Conditions in the Northeast , 2015 .

[7]  Staf Roels,et al.  Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation , 2012 .

[8]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  A technique for the prediction of the conditions leading to mould growth in buildings , 1999 .

[9]  Ruut Hannele Peuhkuri,et al.  Mold growth modeling of building structures using sensitivity classes of materials , 2010 .

[10]  S. Zelinka Corrosion of Metals in Wood Products , 2014 .

[11]  Samuel V. Glass,et al.  Moisture relations and physical properties of wood , 2010 .

[12]  Anton TenWolde,et al.  Accuracy of Wood Resistance Sensors for Measurement of Humidity , 1996 .

[13]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Fungal Defacement in Buildings: A Performance Related Approach , 1999 .

[14]  John Straube,et al.  Methodology and Design of Field Experiments for Monitoring the Hygrothermal Performance of Wood Frame Enclosures , 2002 .

[16]  Alex C. Wiedenhoeft,et al.  Moisture-Related Properties of Wood and the Effects of Moisture on Wood and Wood Products , 2009 .

[17]  Staf Roels,et al.  Towards a more thoughtful use of mould prediction models: A critical view on experimental mould growth research , 2015 .

[18]  Hannu Viitanen,et al.  Factors affecting the development of biodeterioration in wooden constructions , 1994 .

[19]  Ruut Hannele Peuhkuri,et al.  Moisture and Bio-deterioration Risk of Building Materials and Structures , 2010 .

[20]  Kohta Ueno Laboratory Calibration and Field Results of Wood Resistance Humidity Sensors , 2008 .

[21]  Hr Trechsel,et al.  Overview of ASTM MNL 40, Moisture Analysis and Condensation Control in Building Envelopes , 2001 .

[22]  Robert Tichy,et al.  Developing Innovative Wall Systems that Improve Hygrothermal Performance of Residential Buildings , 2006 .

[23]  Charles G. Carll,et al.  Effect of Cladding Systems on Moisture Performance of Wood-Framed Walls in a Mixed-Humid Climate , 2010 .

[24]  Kohta Ueno,et al.  The Hygrothermal Performance of Wood-Framed Wall Systems Using a Relative Humidity-Dependent Vapor Retarder in the Pacific Northwest , 1995 .

[25]  A. Ritschkoff,et al.  Mould growth in pine and spruce sapwood in relation to air humidity and temperature , 1991 .

[26]  Anton TenWolde,et al.  A Review of ASHRAE Standard 160—Criteria for Moisture Control Design Analysis in Buildings , 2011 .

[27]  H. Viitanen,et al.  A mathematical model of mould growth on wooden material , 1999, Wood Science and Technology.

[28]  H. Viitanen,et al.  Modelling the Time Factor in the Development of Mould Fungi - the Effect of Critical Humidity and Temperature Conditions on Pine and Spruce Sapwood , 1997 .

[29]  Kohta Ueno,et al.  Field Testing Unvented Roofs with Asphalt Shingles in Cold and Hot-Humid Climates , 2015 .

[30]  R. Ruan,et al.  Water mobility and mold susceptibility of engineered wood products , 2006 .

[31]  T. Ojanen,et al.  Improved model to predict mould growth in building materials , 2007 .