Estudo comparativo do desempenho visual e análise de frente de onda entre as lentes intra-oculares multifocais difrativas Tecnis® ZM900 e AcrySof® ResTor® SN60D3

PURPOSE: Comparison of the visual performance and wavefront analysis between patients with Tecnis® ZM900 aspheric and AcrySof ReStor® SN60D3 spheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL). METHODS: This prospective comparative study included 78 eyes of 39 patients. The performed ophthalmologic evaluation included near, intermediate and distance corrected and uncorrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity measurement (under photopic and mesopic conditions) and wavefront analysis with the OPD-Scan aberrometrer. RESULTS: Uncorrected near and distance visual acuity and aberrometry analysis were similar with both intraocular lenses; nevertheless, intermediate visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions were statistically better with Tecnis ZM900. CONCLUSION: Both studied intraocular lenses promoted excellent near and distance postoperative visual acuity, in high contrast situations. Tecnis ZM900 IOL provided good quality of vision with high contrast condition in low luminosity with reduction in spherical aberration and improvements in intermediate visual acuity when compared to Restor IOL.

[1]  Mujtaba A. Qazi,et al.  Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  L. Mastropasqua,et al.  Visual performance and biocompatibility of 2 multifocal diffractive IOLs: Six‐month comparative study , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Robert Montés-Micó,et al.  Clear lens extraction with multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Norberto López-Gil,et al.  New intraocular lens for achromatizing the human eye , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  A. Sá,et al.  Surgical correction of presbyopia with multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses , 2007 .

[6]  H. Kaymak,et al.  Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  F. Jacobi,et al.  [Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. Investigation of the Array SA40N vs. Acri. Twin at the "physical eye" according to Reiner and Jacobi]. , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[8]  T. Seiler,et al.  The effect of phenylephrine and cyclopentolate on objective wavefront measurements. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[9]  Carlos E Souza,et al.  Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Davison,et al.  History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[12]  M. Chalita,et al.  Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and wavefront analysis: pseudophakic eye with multifocal IOL (ReSTOR) versus fellow phakic eye in non-presbyopic patients. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  D. Pham,et al.  Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Intraokularlinsenimplantation mit oder ohne Blaulichtfilter: ein intraindividueller Vergleich bei 14 Kataraktpatienten , 2006 .

[14]  J. Marshall,et al.  Clinical results of the blue‐light filtering AcrySof Natural foldable acrylic intraocular lens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  M. Cox,et al.  Limitations of correcting spherical aberration with aspheric intraocular lenses. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity and color discrimination after clear and yellow intraocular lens implantation , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  Wilhelm Stork,et al.  Imaging quality of intraocular lenses , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  Cristina Muccioli,et al.  Avaliação da sensibilidade ao contraste e da estereopsia em pacientes com lente intra-ocular multifocal , 2005 .

[19]  B. Lundh,et al.  Colour contrast sensitivity with different intraocular lens materials in the right and left eyes in same day surgery. , 2005, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[20]  Sergio Barbero,et al.  Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[21]  Roberto Bellucci,et al.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  D. Apple,et al.  Removal times for a dispersive and a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device correlated with intraocular lens material , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  Ed Geraghty,et al.  Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  W. Werner,et al.  Abbildungseigenschaften sphärischer und asphärischer Intraokularlinsen , 1999 .

[26]  T. Olsen,et al.  Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound , 1989, Acta ophthalmologica.

[27]  G. Sallet.  Refractive outcome after bilateral implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens. , 2006, Bulletin de la Societe belge d'ophtalmologie.

[28]  M. Rękas,et al.  Multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses in cataract surgery--preliminary report. , 2006, Klinika oczna.

[29]  Z. Mariak,et al.  [Sir Harold Ridley--the creator of modern cataract surgery]. , 2005, Klinika oczna.