Promoting digital competence in secondary education: are schools there? Insights from a case study

In recent years, a large number of educational systems, following the recommendations of international organisations, have introduced a competence-based emphasis into their traditionally subject-based curriculum. This move, beyond what any document can deal with, does not seem to find its way into everyday school practice easily or with instant results. This paper explores encounters and clashes between policy and practice regarding a competence-based curriculum framework. We refer firstly to the notions about information processing and digital competence held by international organisations and the Spanish and Catalan Ministry of Education, and the implications of said notions for teaching. Then, from evidence collected through class observations, interviews with students and teachers, and documents analysis in a case study, we draw on four teaching and learning scenarios where ICT is regularly used. Promoting students’ digital competence is one of the key competences prescribed in the curriculum; however, our study showed that the backgrounds and educational views of teachers, as well as the teaching culture and organisation of schools, should be deeply challenged to foster this competence.

[1]  Antonio Fini,et al.  Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  CHAPTER 20 Constructionism and the Grounded Theory Method , 2007 .

[3]  Sibel Somyürek,et al.  Digital competence: Is it an innate talent of the new generation or an ability that must be developed? , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  J. Bruner Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing , 1973 .

[5]  Kt Koshy How do students learn , 1984 .

[6]  B. Glaser The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted With Description , 2001 .

[7]  Joel H. K. Vuolevi,et al.  Beyond the information given: The power of a belief in self-interest , 2009 .

[8]  Yves Punie,et al.  Understanding Digital Competence in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Current Frameworks , 2012, EC-TEL.

[9]  S. Sarason The predictable failure of educational reform : can we change course before it's too late? , 1990 .

[10]  Ove Edvard Hatlevik,et al.  Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Yves Punie,et al.  Experts' views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[12]  E. Bruijn,et al.  Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education : challenges to vocational educators. , 2011 .

[13]  Larry Cuban How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms, 1890-1990 , 1984 .

[14]  P. Thomson ‘Scaling up’ educational change: some musings on misrecognition and doxic challenges , 2014 .

[15]  J. Gil,et al.  La fugacidad de las políticas, la inercia de las prácticas : la educación y las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación , 2012 .

[16]  DeSeCo Oecd Definition and Selection of Key Competencies-Executive Summary , 2005 .

[17]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Change forces : the sequel , 2005 .

[18]  Rune Johan Krumsvik,et al.  Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher education and schools , 2011 .

[19]  B. Bernstein On the Classification and Framing of Educational Knowledge , 2018 .

[20]  K. Mills A Review of the “Digital Turn” in the New Literacy Studies , 2010 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[22]  S. Sarason The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform , 1990 .

[23]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[24]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[25]  Helen Jøsok Gansmo Fun for all = digital competence for all? , 2009 .