Innovating for elderly people: the development of geront’innovations in the French silver economy

ABSTRACT The objective of this paper is to study the supply side of the silver market, which is usually neglected by research on this topic. Adopting a systemic approach to innovation, our main goals are to identify the nature of the innovations developed, the way innovations are created, and the issues related to their emergence and diffusion. Our research is based on an empirical study of the French silver economy, which consists in an enquiry carried out in Silver Valley. The results of our study lead us to suggest a new term ‘geront’innovation’ to qualify the various forms of innovations developed to cater for the needs of elderly people. We also put forward the importance of networking and open innovation strategies. Finally, the identified barriers to emergence and diffusion as perceived by the supply side of the market lead us to suggest recommendations to support the diffusion of geront’innovations.

[1]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing—Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life , 2015 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[3]  J. Petermans,et al.  Gerontechnology : don't miss the train, but which is the right carriage , 2017 .

[4]  P. Drucker.  Innovation and entrepreneurship : practice and principles , 1985 .

[5]  E. Giménez,et al.  Decision-driven marketing , 2014 .

[6]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Golden opportunities for silver innovation: How demographic changes give rise to entrepreneurial opportunities to meet the needs of older people , 2015 .

[7]  M. Porter,et al.  How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Companies , 2015 .

[8]  B. Laperche.  Enterprise Knowledge Capital , 2017 .

[9]  U. Witt.  What is specific about evolutionary economics? , 2008 .

[10]  Oskar Jonsson,et al.  STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern ageing. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? , 2015 .

[11]  Fabienne Picard,et al.  Environmental constraints, Product-Service Systems development and impacts on innovation management: learning from manufacturing firms in the French context , 2013 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[13]  H. Bouma.  Gerontechnology : making technology relevant for the elderly , 1992 .

[14]  F. Djellal,et al.  Innovation sociale et innovation de service : première ébauche d'un dialogue nécessaire , 2012 .

[15]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[16]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[17]  M. Porter,et al.  How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition , 2014 .

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[19]  Louis Neven,et al.  By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home , 2015 .

[20]  V. Leve,et al.  The Discovery and Development of the Silver Market in Germany , 2008 .

[21]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The silver market phenomenon : marketing and innovation in the aging society , 2011 .

[22]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[23]  Andrew Sixsmith,et al.  Technology and the Challenge of Aging , 2013 .

[24]  Joost van Hoof,et al.  Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[25]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[26]  Florian Kohlbacher,et al.  The limits of participatory technology development: The case of service robots in care facilities for older people , 2015 .

[27]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Universal Design: Innovations for All Ages , 2011 .

[28]  D. Audretsch,et al.  THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION : KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS , ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND ECONOMIC GROWTH * January 2008 , 2008 .

[29]  R. Cowan,et al.  Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-in and Pest Control Strategies , 1996 .

[30]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations , 2014 .

[31]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[33]  F. Gallouj.  Innovation in the Service Economy , 2002 .

[34]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[35]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[36]  Charles Safran,et al.  Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  F. Schiavone,et al.  The role of vintage communities of practice in technological change , 2015 .

[38]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Les frontières des entreprises : vers une théorie de la cohérence de la grande entreprise , 1990 .

[39]  K. Haga.  Innovation in Rural Japan: Entrepreneurs and Residents Meeting the Challenges of Aging and Shrinking Agricultural Communities , 2018 .

[40]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[41]  Andrew Sixsmith,et al.  Technologies for Active Aging , 2013 .

[42]  C. Fornell.  A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience: , 1992 .

[43]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth , 2006 .