Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study

We conducted a cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort of breast cancer risk factors and two novel measures of breast density volume among 590 women who had attended Glasgow University (1948–1968), replied to a postal questionnaire (2001) and attended breast screening in Scotland (1989–2002). Volumetric breast density was estimated using a fully automated computer programme applied to digitised film-screen mammograms, from medio-lateral oblique mammograms at the first-screening visit. This measured the proportion of the breast volume composed of dense (non-fatty) tissue (Standard Mammogram Form (SMF)%) and the absolute volume of this tissue (SMF volume, cm3). Median age at first screening was 54.1 years (range: 40.0–71.5), median SMF volume 70.25 cm3 (interquartile range: 51.0–103.0) and mean SMF% 26.3%, s.d.=8.0% (range: 12.7–58.8%). Age-adjusted logistic regression models showed a positive relationship between age at last menstrual period and SMF%, odds ratio (OR) per year later: 1.05 (95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.08, P=0.004). Number of pregnancies was inversely related to SMF volume, OR per extra pregnancy: 0.78 (0.70–0.86, P<0.001). There was a suggestion of a quadratic relationship between birthweight and SMF%, with lowest risks in women born under 2.5 and over 4 kg. Body mass index (BMI) at university (median age 19) and in 2001 (median age 62) were positively related to SMF volume, OR per extra kg m−2 1.21 (1.15–1.28) and 1.17 (1.09–1.26), respectively, and inversely related to SMF%, OR per extra kg m−2 0.83 (0.79–0.88) and 0.82 (0.76–0.88), respectively, P<0.001. Standard Mammogram Form% and absolute SMF volume are related to several, but not all, breast cancer risk factors. In particular, the positive relationship between BMI and SMF volume suggests that volume of dense breast tissue will be a useful marker in breast cancer studies.

[1]  M. Hakama,et al.  Favorable change in mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk factors , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[2]  R. Warren,et al.  Breast density: agreement of measures from film and digital image. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  V. Shane Pankratz,et al.  Prenatal and Perinatal Correlates of Adult Mammographic Breast Density , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  G. Berglund,et al.  A prospective study of adiposity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: The Malmö diet and cancer study , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[5]  S. Duffy,et al.  High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  R. Warren,et al.  Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  N. Boyd,et al.  Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Peter H Watson,et al.  Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[9]  N. Boyd,et al.  Macronutrient intake and change in mammographic density at menopause: results from a randomized trial. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[10]  T. Sellers,et al.  Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) , 2000, Cancer Causes & Control.

[11]  L. Tabár,et al.  Anthropometric indices in relation to mammographic patterns among peri‐menopausal women , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[12]  Norman Boyd,et al.  The Association of Measured Breast Tissue Characteristics with Mammographic Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[13]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  G. Maskarinec,et al.  Comparison of mammographic densities and their determinants in women from Japan and Hawaii , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[15]  G. Smith,et al.  Life course exposure and later disease: a follow-up study based on medical examinations carried out in Glasgow University (1948-68). , 1999, Public health.

[16]  R. Warren,et al.  Can the stroma provide the clue to the cellular basis for mammographic density? , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[17]  J L Kelsey,et al.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[18]  R. Warren Hormones and mammographic breast density. , 2004, Maturitas.

[19]  Michael Brady,et al.  A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing , 1995, CVRMed.

[20]  G. Maskarinec,et al.  A cross‐sectional investigation of breast density and insulin‐like growth factor I , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[21]  G. Colditz,et al.  Common genetic variation in IGF1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 in relation to mammographic density: a cross-sectional study , 2007, Breast Cancer Research.

[22]  R. Warren,et al.  Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[23]  N F Boyd,et al.  Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[24]  M. Daly,et al.  Acculturation and Breast Density in Foreign-Born, U.S. Chinese Women , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[25]  Unfavourable change in mammographic patterns and the breast cancer risk factors , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Comparison of a New and Existing Method of Mammographic Density Measurement: Intramethod Reliability and Associations with Known Risk Factors , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[27]  N. Boyd,et al.  The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  N. Boyd,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer associated with mammographic features in Singaporean chinese women. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[29]  J. Heine,et al.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[30]  George Davey Smith,et al.  Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF) , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[31]  S. Taplin,et al.  Reproductive and hormonal factors associated with mammographic breast density by age (United States) , 2000, Cancer Causes & Control.

[32]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[33]  Michael Brady,et al.  Mammographic Image Analysis , 1999, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[34]  R. Warren,et al.  Red clover-derived isoflavones and mammographic breast density: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [ISRCTN42940165] , 2004, Breast Cancer Research.