Prostate motion modelling using biomechanically-trained deep neural networks on unstructured nodes

In this paper, we propose to train deep neural networks with biomechanical simulations, to predict the prostate motion encountered during ultrasound-guided interventions. In this application, unstructured points are sampled from segmented pre-operative MR images to represent the anatomical regions of interest. The point sets are then assigned with point-specific material properties and displacement loads, forming the un-ordered input feature vectors. An adapted PointNet can be trained to predict the nodal displacements, using finite element (FE) simulations as ground-truth data. Furthermore, a versatile bootstrap aggregating mechanism is validated to accommodate the variable number of feature vectors due to different patient geometries, comprised of a training-time bootstrap sampling and a model averaging inference. This results in a fast and accurate approximation to the FE solutions without requiring subject-specific solid meshing. Based on 160,000 nonlinear FE simulations on clinical imaging data from 320 patients, we demonstrate that the trained networks generalise to unstructured point sets sampled directly from holdout patient segmentation, yielding a near real-time inference and an expected error of 0.017 mm in predicted nodal displacement.

[1]  Nazim Haouchine,et al.  Deformation-based Augmented Reality for Hepatic Surgery , 2013, MMVR.

[2]  Wei Sun,et al.  A deep learning approach to estimate stress distribution: a fast and accurate surrogate of finite-element analysis , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  Herve Delingette,et al.  Real-Time Elastic Deformations of Soft Tissues for Surgery Simulation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[4]  Atsushi Saito,et al.  A Statistical Shape Model for Multiple Organs Based on Synthesized-Based Learning , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[5]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Automated Finite-Element Analysis for Deformable Registration of Prostate Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[8]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  High-Speed Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis for Surgical Simulation Using Graphics Processing Units , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Ming Xu,et al.  Towards Personalized Statistical Deformable Model and Hybrid Point Matching for Robust MR-TRUS Registration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Improved Non-rigid Registration of Prostate MRI , 2004, MICCAI.

[11]  BerkleyJeffrey,et al.  Real-Time Finite Element Modeling for Surgery Simulation , 2004 .

[12]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  A Reduced Order Explicit Dynamic Finite Element Algorithm for Surgical Simulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Long Chen FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[14]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  NiftySim: A GPU-based nonlinear finite element package for simulation of soft tissue biomechanics , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[16]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  Physics-Based Deep Neural Network for Augmented Reality During Liver Surgery , 2019, MICCAI.

[17]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Efficient topology modification and deformation for finite element models using condensation. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  Mark A. Ganter,et al.  Real-time finite element modeling for surgery simulation: an application to virtual suturing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Statistical Biomechanical Surface Registration: Application to MR-TRUS Fusion for Prostate Interventions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Tommaso Mansi,et al.  Deep learning acceleration of Total Lagrangian Explicit Dynamics for soft tissue mechanics , 2020 .

[21]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  Simulation of hyperelastic materials in real-time using Deep Learning , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  H. Tengg-Kobligk,et al.  Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[23]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  A Statistical Motion Model Based on Biomechanical Simulations for Data Fusion during Image-Guided Prostate Interventions , 2008, MICCAI.

[24]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[25]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[26]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Modelling Prostate Motion for Data Fusion During Image-Guided Interventions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.