A simulation study evaluating the performance of high-density electrode arrays on myocardial tissue

Multielectrode arrays used to detect cellular activation have become so dense (electrodes per square millimeter) as to jeopardize the basic assumptions of activation mapping; namely, that electrodes are points adequately separated as to not interfere with the tissue or each other. This paper directly tests these assumptions for high-density electrode arrays. Using a finite element model with modified Fitzhugh-Nagumo kinetics, the authors represent electrodes as isopotential surfaces of varying widths and spacing ratio (SR) (center-to-center spacing divided by electrode width). They examine the signal strength and ability of a single electrode to detect activation due to a passing wavefront. They find that high-density arrays do not cause significant wavefront curvature or alter activation timing in the underlying tissue. Relationships between signal strength, cross talk, and array design are explained by the interaction of the propagating wavefront and induced sources on the isopotential electrodes. Sensitivity analysis shows that these results may be generalized to a wide range of physiologically relevant designs and applications. It is concluded that electrode array designs in which electrode spacing greatly exceeds electrode diameter are overly conservative and that arrays with a SR of less than 2.0 may perform successfully in electrophysiological studies.

[1]  R Plonsey,et al.  In vivo estimation of cardiac transmembrane current. , 1993, Circulation research.

[2]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[3]  I R Efimov,et al.  Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure. , 1998, Circulation research.

[4]  R. Ideker,et al.  Optical transmembrane potential measurements during defibrillation-strength shocks in perfused rabbit hearts. , 1995, Circulation research.

[5]  R. Ideker,et al.  Efficient electrode spacing for examining spatial organization during ventricular fibrillation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[7]  E. Entcheva,et al.  Virtual Electrode Effects in Transvenous Defibrillation‐Modulation by Structure and Interface: Evidence from Bidomain Simulations and Optical Mapping , 1998, Cardiovascular Electrophysiology.

[8]  David S. Burnett,et al.  Finite Element Analysis: From Concepts to Applications , 1987 .

[9]  S. Knisley,et al.  Transmembrane voltage changes during unipolar stimulation of rabbit ventricle. , 1995, Circulation research.

[10]  V. Fast,et al.  Anisotropic activation spread in heart cell monolayers assessed by high-resolution optical mapping. Role of tissue discontinuities. , 1996, Circulation research.

[11]  D. Roden,et al.  Virtual cathode effects during stimulation of cardiac muscle. Two-dimensional in vivo experiments. , 1991, Circulation research.

[12]  R E Ideker,et al.  Spatial changes in the transmembrane potential during extracellular electric stimulation. , 1998, Circulation research.

[13]  V. Fast,et al.  Spatial changes in transmembrane potential during extracellular electrical shocks in cultured monolayers of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 1996, Circulation research.

[14]  C. Henriquez Simulating the electrical behavior of cardiac tissue using the bidomain model. , 1993, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[15]  R A Malkin,et al.  Constructing a multichannel electrocardiography system from a few standardized, high-level components. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[16]  A. McCulloch,et al.  A collocation-Galerkin finite element model of cardiac action potential propagation , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Discrete versus syncytial tissue behavior in a model of cardiac stimulation. II. Results of simulation , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  M. Spach,et al.  The stochastic nature of cardiac propagation at a microscopic level. Electrical description of myocardial architecture and its application to conduction. , 1995, Circulation research.

[19]  N. Trayanova Discrete versus syncytial tissue behavior in a model of cardiac stimulation. I. Mathematical formulation , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Effective boundary conditions for syncytial tissues , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  R Plonsey,et al.  Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings. , 1990, Circulation.

[22]  R E Ideker,et al.  Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. , 1993, Circulation research.

[23]  R G Mark,et al.  Time delays in propagation of cardiac action potential. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  L Tung,et al.  Optical Recordings of Ventricular Excitability of Frog Heart by an Extracellular Stimulating Point Electrode , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.