Data logger technologies for manual wheelchairs: A scoping review

ABSTRACT In recent years, studies have increasingly employed data logger technologies to record objective driving and physiological characteristics of manual wheelchair users. However, the technologies used offer significant differences in characteristics, such as measured outcomes, ease of use, and level of burden. In order to identify and describe the extent of published research activity that relies on data logger technologies for manual wheelchair users, we performed a scoping review of the scientific and gray literature. Five databases were searched: Medline, Compendex, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. The 119 retained papers document a wide variety of logging devices and sensing technologies measuring a range of outcomes. The most commonly used technologies were accelerometers installed on the user (18.8%), odometers installed on the wheelchair (12.4%), accelerometers installed on the wheelchair (9.7%), and heart monitors (9.7%). Not surprisingly, the most reported outcomes were distance, mobility events, heart rate, speed/velocity, acceleration, and driving time. With decreasing costs and technological improvements, data loggers are likely to have future widespread clinical (and even personal) use. Future research may be needed to assess the usefulness of different outcomes and to develop methods more appropriate to wheelchair users in order to optimize the practicality of wheelchair data loggers.

[1]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[2]  A. Frank,et al.  Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[4]  M J Scherer,et al.  Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  Dylan Thompson,et al.  Influence of Accelerometer Type and Placement on Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Prediction in Manual Wheelchair Users , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  X. García-Massó,et al.  Validation of the use of Actigraph GT3X accelerometers to estimate energy expenditure in full time manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury , 2013, Spinal Cord.

[7]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Manual Wheelchair Use: Bouts of Mobility in Everyday Life , 2012, Rehabilitation research and practice.

[8]  C. Warms.  Physical Activity Measurement in Persons With Chronic and Disabling Conditions: Methods, Strategies, and Issues , 2006, Family & community health.

[9]  Franz Konstantin Fuss,et al.  Development of low cost on-board velocity and position measurement system for wheelchair sports , 2010 .

[10]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Wheelchair tennis match-play demands: effect of player rank and result. , 2013, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[11]  H. Hoenig,et al.  Activity Restriction Among Wheelchair Users , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  T. Nightingale,et al.  Predicting physical activity energy expenditure in manual wheelchair users. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  H J Stam,et al.  Validity of the detection of wheelchair propulsion as measured with an Activity Monitor in patients with spinal cord injury , 2005, Spinal Cord.

[14]  W Ben Mortenson,et al.  Prevalence of Wheelchair and Scooter Use Among Community-Dwelling Canadians , 2016, Physical Therapy.

[15]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  A Pilot Study on Community Usage of a Pushrim-Activated, Power-Assisted Wheelchair , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[16]  François Routhier,et al.  Impact of wheelchair acquisition on social participation , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[17]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Jeffrey W Jutai,et al.  The Effect of Wheelchair Use on the Quality of Life of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis , 2004, Occupational therapy in health care.

[19]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Criterion validity and accuracy of global positioning satellite and data logging devices for wheelchair tennis court movement , 2013, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[20]  H Stephen Kaye,et al.  Demographics and Trends in Wheeled Mobility Equipment Use and Accessibility in the Community , 2010, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[21]  A. Rajić,et al.  A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency , 2014, Research synthesis methods.

[22]  Todd Kuiken,et al.  Global Position Sensing and Step Activity as Outcome Measures of Community Mobility and Social Interaction for an Individual With a Transfemoral Amputation Due to Dysvascular Disease , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[23]  William A Ghali,et al.  Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[24]  M. Boninger,et al.  Assessing mobility characteristics and activity levels of manual wheelchair users. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  R. Motl,et al.  Accelerometer output and its association with energy expenditure during manual wheelchair propulsion , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[26]  R. Washburn,et al.  Assessing Physical Activity during Wheelchair Pushing: Validity of a Portable Accelerometer , 1999 .

[27]  Shwetak N. Patel,et al.  Implementing technology-based embedded assessment in the home and community life of individuals aging with disabilities: a participatory research and development study , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[28]  Luc Noreau,et al.  Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[30]  X. García-Massó,et al.  Identifying physical activity type in manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury by means of accelerometers , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[31]  David Heath,et al.  THE CONGRESS Of THE UNITED STATES. , 1906, Science.

[32]  J F Sallis,et al.  Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[33]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[34]  Ian Dewancker.  Lifespace tracking and activity monitoring on mobile phones , 2014 .

[35]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Validation of an accelerometer-based method to measure the use of manual wheelchairs. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  Peter R. Giacobbi,et al.  Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.