Crop water stress mapping for site-specific irrigation by thermal imagery and artificial reference surfaces

Variable-rate irrigation by machines or solid set systems has become technically feasible, however mapping crop water status is necessary to match irrigation quantities to site-specific crop water demands. Remote thermal sensing can provide such maps in sufficient detail and in a timely way. In a set of aerial and ground scans at the Hula Valley, Israel, digital crop water stress maps were generated using geo-referenced high-resolution thermal imagery and artificial reference surfaces. Canopy-related pixels were separated from those of the soil by upper and lower thresholds related to air temperature, and canopy temperatures were calculated from the coldest 33% of the pixel histogram. Artificial surfaces that had been wetted provided reference temperatures for the crop water stress index (CWSI) normalized to ambient conditions. Leaf water potentials of cotton were related linearly to CWSI values with R2 = 0.816. Maps of crop stress level generated from aerial scans of cotton, process tomatoes and peanut fields corresponded well with both ground-based observations by the farm operators and irrigation history. Numeric quantification of stress levels was provided to support decisions to divide fields into sections for spatially variable irrigation scheduling.

[1]  S. Idso,et al.  Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator , 1981 .

[2]  Sherwood B. Idso,et al.  Non-water-stressed baselines: A key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress , 1982 .

[3]  H. Yamada,et al.  Relation of Cotton Growth and Yield to Minimum Leaf Water Potential 1 , 1982 .

[4]  T. Howell,et al.  Management of Farm Irrigation Systems , 1990 .

[5]  David C. Nielsen,et al.  Infrared thermometry and the crop water stress index. II : sampling procedures and interpretation , 1992 .

[6]  David C. Nielsen,et al.  Infrared Thermometry and the Crop Water Stress Index. I. History, Theory, and Baselines , 1992 .

[7]  D. Or Soil Water Sensor Placement and Interpretation fOr, D.ip Irrigation Management in Heterogeneous Soils , 1994 .

[8]  D. Zilberman,et al.  The California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS): Intended and Unanticipated Impacts of Public Investment , 1998 .

[9]  Hamlyn G. Jones,et al.  Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance as a possible aid to irrigation scheduling , 1999 .

[10]  Variability in soil moisture measurements , 2000, Irrigation Science.

[11]  J. Stafford,et al.  Remote mapping of crop water status to assess spatial variability of crop stress. , 2003 .

[12]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Complete Center Pivot Automation Using the Temperature-Time Threshold Method of Irrigation Scheduling. , 2004 .

[13]  H. Jones,et al.  Combining thermal and visible imagery for estimating canopy temperature and identifying plant stress. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[14]  D. W. Grimes,et al.  Pressure chamber procedures for leaf water potential measurements of cotton , 1987, Irrigation Science.

[15]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Estimation of leaf water potential by thermal imagery and spatial analysis. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  Ancha Srinivasan Precision Water Management: Current Realities, Possibilities, and Trends , 2006 .

[17]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  3. Irrigation scheduling , 2007 .