Toward a Comprehensive OSCM Research Methodology: The Role of Design Science

Research in Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM) field is widespread and applied to various sectors of industry and services. Despite its benefits, the diversity of the worldviews of OSCM research applications and the preferences regarding the choice of methodologies by the researchers sometimes cause unnecessary complexities in converging these efforts toward advancing theory and practice. It has been argued that the application of multi-methods could facilitate obtaining a common ground through which OSCM researchers could make more effective and robust contributions in binding theory and practice. There is, however, a lack of a unifying research methodology so that OSCM research could effectively link between theory and practice and move toward more coherence of research in the OSCM field. In this article, we introduce the application of design science research methodology and the use of multi-methods approach in this methodology to draw a road map for more coherent future research attempts in the domain of OSCM. As an example, the behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect are examined and illustration is made on how the dispersed but growing research efforts in this area could be aligned into drawing a behavioral theory of the ordering preferences of decision makers in supply chains and in organizations.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[2]  Elena Katok,et al.  Learning, communication, and the bullwhip effect , 2006 .

[3]  J. Sterman,et al.  Order Stability in Supply Chains: Coordination Risk and the Role of Coordination Stock , 2004 .

[4]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Multi‐Methodological Research in Operations Management , 2016 .

[5]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[6]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms , 1999 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  Kenneth L. Schultz,et al.  Bodies of Knowledge for Research in Behavioral Operations , 2009 .

[9]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Theory Development in Operations Management , 2008 .

[10]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .

[11]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  DEBIASING STRATEGIES IN SUPPLY MANAGEMENT DECISION‐MAKING , 2009 .

[12]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Strengthening the Empirical Base of Operations Management , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[13]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[14]  Kalyan Singhal,et al.  Imperatives of the science of operations and supply-chain management , 2012 .

[15]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .

[16]  Karen Donohue,et al.  Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  John A. Aloysius,et al.  Exploring Framing Effects in Inventory Control Decisions: Violations of Procedure Invariance , 2016 .

[18]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Empirical Elephants—Why Multiple Methods are Essential to Quality Research in Operations and Supply Chain Management , 2008 .

[20]  Arunachalam Narayanan,et al.  Decision Making and Cognition in Multi‐Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study , 2015 .

[21]  John A. Aloysius,et al.  Supply Chain Inventory Replenishment: The Debiasing Effect of Declarative Knowledge , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[22]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[23]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions , 2006 .

[24]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Multidisciplinary and Multimethod Research for Addressing Contemporary Supply Chain Challenges , 2011 .

[26]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Guiding the Next Generation of Doctoral Students in Operations Management , 2013 .

[27]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[28]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Operations Strategy Research in the POMS Journal , 2005 .

[29]  Kalyan Singhal,et al.  Opportunities for developing the science of operations and supply‐chain management , 2012 .

[30]  H. Walker,et al.  Theoretical perspectives in operations management: an analysis of the literature , 2015 .

[31]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[32]  J. Aken Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management , 2005 .

[33]  David Poole,et al.  Explanation and prediction: an architecture for default and abductive reasoning , 1989, Comput. Intell..

[34]  S. Hohmann The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains , 2014 .

[35]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  POMS Initiatives for Promoting Practice‐Driven Research and Research‐Influenced Practice , 2014 .

[36]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[37]  J. Holmström,et al.  A manufacturer moving upstream: triadic collaboration for service delivery , 2013 .

[38]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[39]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[40]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  OM Forum - OM Research: From Problem-Driven to Data-Driven Research , 2014, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..