The reputation of punishers.

Punishment is a potential mechanism to stabilise cooperation between self-regarding agents. Theoretical and empirical studies on the importance of a punitive reputation have yielded conflicting results. Here, we propose that a variety of factors interact to explain why a punitive reputation is sometimes beneficial and sometimes harmful. We predict that benefits are most likely to occur in forced play scenarios and in situations where punishment is the only means to convey an individual's cooperative intent and willingness to uphold fairness norms. By contrast, if partner choice is possible and an individual's cooperative intent can be inferred directly, then individuals with a nonpunishing cooperative reputation should typically be preferred over punishing cooperators.

[1]  Marco A Janssen,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and altruistic punishment when retaliation is possible , 2008 .

[2]  D. D. de Quervain,et al.  The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment , 2004, Science.

[3]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Direct and indirect punishment among strangers in the field , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  C. Hauert,et al.  Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Cooperation in social dilemmas: free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  L. Keller,et al.  Strong Reciprocity or Strong Ferocity? A Population Genetic View of the Evolution of Altruistic Punishment , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Altruistic punishment and the threat of feuds , 2011 .

[9]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[11]  S. Lea,et al.  Both Loved and Feared: Third Party Punishers Are Viewed as Formidable and Likeable, but These Reputational Benefits May Only Be Open to Dominant Individuals , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Erte Xiao,et al.  Profit-Seeking Punishment Corrupts Norm Obedience , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[13]  T. Yamagishi The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[14]  David G. Rand,et al.  Humans Display a 'Cooperative Phenotype' that is Domain General and Temporally Stable , 2014 .

[15]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment , 2006 .

[17]  Yang Li,et al.  Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  G. Roberts,et al.  Reputation-based partner choice is an effective alternative to indirect reciprocity in solving social dilemmas , 2013 .

[19]  R. Selten Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games , 1975, Classics in Game Theory.

[20]  Christian Hilbe,et al.  Incentives and opportunism: from the carrot to the stick , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reward and punishment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Nelissen The price you pay: cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment , 2008 .

[23]  D. Rankin,et al.  HUMAN COOPERATION BASED ON PUNISHMENT REPUTATION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  M. Watabe,et al.  Reputational benefit of punishment: Comparison among the punisher, rewarder, and non-sanctioner , 2012 .

[25]  Daniel J. Rankin,et al.  The evolution of punishment through reputation , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Dana S. Nau,et al.  High strength-of-ties and low mobility enable the evolution of third-party punishment , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  David G. Rand,et al.  The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. , 2011, Nature communications.

[28]  M. Archetti,et al.  Cooperation as a volunteer’s dilemma and the strategy of conflict in public goods games , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[29]  M. Nowak,et al.  Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations , 1992, Nature.

[30]  Bettina Rockenbach,et al.  To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[32]  Yutaka Horita Punishers May Be Chosen as Providers But Not as Recipients , 2010 .

[33]  Alex Thornton,et al.  Punishment and cooperation in nature. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  David G. Rand,et al.  Winners don’t punish , 2008, Nature.

[35]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Emergence of responsible sanctions without second order free riders, antisocial punishment or spite , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[36]  R. Bshary,et al.  Self-Serving Punishment of a Common Enemy Creates a Public Good in Reef Fishes , 2010, Current Biology.

[37]  Robert Kurzban,et al.  Do humans really punish altruistically? A closer look , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  J. Bering,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Anonymity on Altruistic Punishment , 2008 .

[39]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[40]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Indirect reciprocity provides a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment , 2008, Nature.

[41]  David G. Rand,et al.  Anti-social Punishment Can Prevent the Co-evolution of Punishment and Cooperation , 2010 .

[42]  Peter Sokol-Hessner,et al.  Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself , 2014, Nature Communications.

[43]  T. Okimoto,et al.  Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions , 2011 .

[44]  C. Bicchieri,et al.  Third-Party Sanctioning and Compensation Behavior: Findings From the Ultimatum Game , 2012 .

[45]  A. Diekmann Volunteer's Dilemma , 1985 .

[46]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Audience effects on moralistic punishment , 2007 .

[47]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[48]  David G. Rand,et al.  Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Sanctions as honest signals – The evolution of pool punishment by public sanctioning institutions , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[51]  David G. Rand,et al.  Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable , 2014, Nature Communications.

[52]  Jeffrey P. Carpenter,et al.  Is fairness used instrumentally? Evidence from sequential bargaining , 2003 .

[53]  M. Milinski,et al.  I Dare You to Punish Me—Vendettas in Games of Cooperation , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  Hawaii,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S6 Tables S1 and S2 Database S1 Antisocial Punishment across Societies , 2022 .

[55]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Punishment in animal societies , 1995, Nature.

[56]  Redouan Bshary,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF PUNISHMENT IN n‐PLAYER PUBLIC GOODS GAMES: A VOLUNTEER'S DILEMMA , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.