Testing the role of expansion in the prospective control of locomotion

The constant bearing angle (CBA) strategy is a prospective strategy that permits the interception of moving objects. The purpose of the present study is to test this strategy. Participants were asked to walk through a virtual environment and to change, if necessary, their walking speed so as to intercept approaching targets. The targets followed either a rectilinear or a curvilinear trajectory and target size was manipulated both within trials (target size was gradually changed during the trial in order to bias expansion) and between trials (targets of different sizes were used). The curvature manipulation had a large effect on the kinematics of walking, which is in agreement with the CBA strategy. The target size manipulations also affected the kinematics of walking. Although these effects of target size are not predicted by the CBA strategy, quantitative comparisons of observed kinematics and the kinematics predicted by the CBA strategy showed good fits. Furthermore, predictions based on the CBA strategy were deemed superior to predictions based on a required velocity (VREQ) model. The role of target size and expansion in the prospective control of walking is discussed.

[1]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[2]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Colin Ellard,et al.  Visually guided locomotion and computation of time-to-collision in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): the effects of frontal and visual cortical lesions , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  Cynthia F Moss,et al.  Echolocating Bats Use a Nearly Time-Optimal Strategy to Intercept Prey , 2006, PLoS biology.

[5]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  B. Johansson.  Chapter 25: Experimental models of altering the blood-brain barrier , 1992 .

[8]  B S Lanchester,et al.  Pursuit and prediction in the tracking of moving food by a teleost fish (Acanthaluteres spilomelanurus). , 1975, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  Guillaume Rao,et al.  Judging where a ball will go: the case of curved free kicks in football , 2006, Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  R. Bootsma,et al.  On the information-based regulation of movement: What Wann (1996) may want to consider , 1997 .

[11]  Scott M Krauchunas,et al.  How Dogs Navigate to Catch Frisbees , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  Julien Bastin,et al.  Muscular proprioception contributes to the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Geert J P Savelsbergh,et al.  Rate of Change of Angular Bearing as the Relevant Property in a Horizontal Interception Task During Locomotion , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  Julien Bastin,et al.  The perceptual support of goal-directed displacement is context-dependent , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  C. Ellard.  Visually guided locomotion in the gerbil: a comparison of open- and closed-loop control , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  A. Chardenona,et al.  The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion , 2002 .

[17]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception II: predicting hand movements. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  P. McLeod,et al.  The generalized optic acceleration cancellation theory of catching. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.

[20]  C. E. Peper,et al.  Chapter 12 Predictive Visual Information Sources for the Regulation of Action with Special Emphasis on Catching and Hitting , 1992 .

[21]  J. Bastin,et al.  Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Human movement science.

[22]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  M. Goodale,et al.  A mammalian model of optic-flow utilization in the control of locomotion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  G. Montagne,et al.  A Robust Solution for Dealing With Environmental Changes in Intercepting Moving Balls , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  C. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in punching a falling ball , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Spatially constrained locomotion under informational conflict , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  M. Laurent,et al.  Perception-action coupling in an interceptive task: First-order time-to-contact as an input variable , 2000 .

[28]  Sunita Shankar.  Visually guided locomotion and computation of time-to-collision in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus), probing the neural substrates , 2000 .

[29]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception I: operative optical variables, attunement, and calibration. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[31]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow , 1998, Current Biology.

[32]  J. van der Kamp,et al.  Catching optical information for the regulation of timing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[34]  John P. Wann,et al.  How do we control high speed steering , 2004 .

[35]  S. Arom,et al.  African polyphony and polyrhythm: Description and analysis , 1991 .

[36]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Richard M Wilkie,et al.  The role of visual and nonvisual information in the control of locomotion. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[39]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  S. Rossel,et al.  Predicting three-dimensional target motion: how archer fish determine where to catch their dislodged prey. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  G. Montagne,et al.  The study of locomotor pointing in virtual reality: The validation of a test set-up , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[42]  M. Lenoir,et al.  Intercepting Moving Objects During Self-Motion. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[43]  G. J. Savelsbergh,et al.  Grasping tau. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Movement reversals in ball catching , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  K. R. Llewellyn,et al.  Visual guidance of locomotion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.