Artificial Intelligence-Based Breast Cancer Nodal Metastasis Detection: Insights Into the Black Box for Pathologists.

CONTEXT.— Nodal metastasis of a primary tumor influences therapy decisions for a variety of cancers. Histologic identification of tumor cells in lymph nodes can be laborious and error-prone, especially for small tumor foci. OBJECTIVE.— To evaluate the application and clinical implementation of a state-of-the-art deep learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm (LYmph Node Assistant or LYNA) for detection of metastatic breast cancer in sentinel lymph node biopsies. DESIGN.— Whole slide images were obtained from hematoxylin-eosin-stained lymph nodes from 399 patients (publicly available Camelyon16 challenge dataset). LYNA was developed by using 270 slides and evaluated on the remaining 129 slides. We compared the findings to those obtained from an independent laboratory (108 slides from 20 patients/86 blocks) using a different scanner to measure reproducibility. RESULTS.— LYNA achieved a slide-level area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 99% and a tumor-level sensitivity of 91% at 1 false positive per patient on the Camelyon16 evaluation dataset. We also identified 2 "normal" slides that contained micrometastases. When applied to our second dataset, LYNA achieved an AUC of 99.6%. LYNA was not affected by common histology artifacts such as overfixation, poor staining, and air bubbles. CONCLUSIONS.— Artificial intelligence algorithms can exhaustively evaluate every tissue patch on a slide, achieving higher tumor-level sensitivity than, and comparable slide-level performance to, pathologists. These techniques may improve the pathologist's productivity and reduce the number of false negatives associated with morphologic detection of tumor cells. We provide a framework to aid practicing pathologists in assessing such algorithms for adoption into their workflow (akin to how a pathologist assesses immunohistochemistry results).

[1]  David F. Steiner,et al.  Impact of Deep Learning Assistance on the Histopathologic Review of Lymph Nodes for Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2018, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[2]  Clive R. Taylor,et al.  Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology , 2017, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[3]  Andrew H. Beck,et al.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer , 2017, JAMA.

[4]  Jeffrey A. Golden,et al.  Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases From Breast Cancer: Helping Artificial Intelligence Be Seen. , 2017, JAMA.

[5]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes , 2017, JAMA.

[6]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise , 2017, ArXiv.

[7]  Scott R. Granter,et al.  AlphaGo, Deep Learning, and the Future of the Human Microscopist. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  S. Granter,et al.  Straw Men, Deep Learning, and the Future of the Human Microscopist: Response to "Artificial Intelligence and the Pathologist: Future Frenemies?" , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and the Pathologist: Future Frenemies? , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[10]  Aleksey Boyko,et al.  Detecting Cancer Metastases on Gigapixel Pathology Images , 2017, ArXiv.

[11]  C. Compton,et al.  The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population‐based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[13]  Subhashini Venugopalan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. , 2016, JAMA.

[14]  S. Misra,et al.  Capsular nevus versus metastatic malignant melanoma – a diagnostic dilemma , 2016, International journal of surgery case reports.

[15]  Dayong Wang,et al.  Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2016, ArXiv.

[16]  B. van Ginneken,et al.  Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Stain Specific Standardization of Whole-Slide Histopathological Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Sophia K Apple,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer: Review Article from a Pathologist’s Point of View , 2016, Journal of pathology and translational medicine.

[19]  Andrew Janowczyk,et al.  Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases , 2016, Journal of pathology informatics.

[20]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[21]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[22]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Andrew Evans,et al.  Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond. , 2013, Annual review of pathology.

[24]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[25]  Anil Kokaram,et al.  The linear Monge-Kantorovitch linear colour mapping for example-based colour transfer , 2007 .

[26]  J. A. van der Laak,et al.  Hue-saturation-density (HSD) model for stain recognition in digital images from transmitted light microscopy. , 2000, Cytometry.

[27]  K. Anders,et al.  Benign melanocytic nevus cells in axillary lymph nodes. A prospective incidence and immunohistochemical study with literature review. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  J. Boitnott,et al.  Immunoperoxidase staining as a diagnostic aid for hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1989, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[29]  L. Dalton,et al.  Comparison of keratin monoclonal antibodies MAK-6, AE1:AE3, and CAM-5.2. , 1987, American journal of clinical pathology.