Group-Wise FMRI Activation Detection on DICCCOL Landmarks

Group-wise activation detection in task-based fMRI has been widely used because of its robustness to noises and its capacity to deal with variability of individual brains. However, current group-wise fMRI activation detection methods typically rely on the co-registration of individual brains’ fMRI images, which has difficulty in dealing with the remarkable anatomic variation of different brains. As a consequence, the resulted misalignments could significantly degrade the required inter-subject correspondences, thus substantially reducing the sensitivity and specificity of group-wise fMRI activation detection. To deal with these challenges, this paper presents a novel approach to detecting group-wise fMRI activation on our recently developed and validated Dense Individualized and Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks (DICCCOL). The basic idea here is that the first-level general linear model (GLM) analysis is first performed on the fMRI signal of each corresponding DICCCOL landmark in individual brain’s own space, and then the estimated effect sizes of the same landmark from a group of subjects are statistically assessed with the mixed-effect model at the group level. Finally, the consistently activated DICCCOL landmarks are determined and declared in a group-wise fashion in response to external block-based stimuli. Our experimental results have demonstrated that the proposed approach can detect meaningful activations.

[1]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jan Velterop,et al.  Necessity is the mother of innovation , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[3]  Brian Caffo,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical framework for spatial modeling of fMRI data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[4]  Amir M. Tahmasebi,et al.  Quantification of Inter-subject Variability in Human Brain and Its Impact on Analysis of fMRI Data , 2010 .

[5]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Group MRF for fMRI activation detection , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  Hal S. Stern,et al.  A Bayesian Mixture Approach to Modeling Spatial Activation Patterns in Multisite fMRI Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Reducing Inter-subject Anatomical Variation : Analysis of the Functional Activity in Auditory Cortex and Superior Temporal Region using HAMMER , 2007 .

[9]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Quantification of inter-subject variability in human brain: a validation framework for probabilistic maps , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[10]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[11]  Martin Styner,et al.  TwinMARM: Two-Stage Multiscale Adaptive Regression Methods for Twin Neuroimaging Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  P. Hluštík,et al.  Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Optimization of functional brain ROIs via maximization of consistency of structural connectivity profiles , 2011, ISBI.

[14]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Impact of inter-subject image registration on group analysis of fMRI data , 2004 .

[15]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Complex span tasks and hippocampal recruitment during working memory , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[18]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Automatic Part Selection for Groupwise Registration , 2011, IPMI.

[19]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Individualized ROI Optimization via Maximization of Group-wise Consistency of Structural and Functional Profiles , 2010, NIPS.

[20]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Modeling Inter‐Subject Variability in fMRI Activation Location: A Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Model , 2009, Biometrics.

[21]  Lei Guo,et al.  Predicting functional cortical ROIs via DTI-derived fiber shape models. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[23]  D. Shen,et al.  DICCCOL: dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Modeling Brain Activation in fMRI Using Group MRF , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  B. Everitt,et al.  Mixture model mapping of brain activation in functional magnetic resonance images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Multiscale adaptive regression models for neuroimaging data , 2011, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[29]  Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al.  Comments and Controversies Lost in Localization: a Minimal Middle Way , 2022 .

[30]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Multiscale Adaptive Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Neuroimaging Data ☆ , 2022 .

[32]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Visual analytics of brain networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Variability in fMRI: A re‐examination of inter‐session differences , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Xintao Hu,et al.  Individual Functional ROI Optimization Via Maximization of Group-Wise Consistency of Structural and Functional Profiles , 2010, Neuroinformatics.

[35]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Fiber-Centered Analysis of Brain Connectivities Using DTI and Resting State FMRI Data , 2010, MICCAI.

[36]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  Dajiang Zhu,et al.  Connectomics signatures of prenatal cocaine exposure affected adolescent brains , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention − MICCAI 2017: 20th International Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada, September 11-13, 2017, Proceedings, Part II , 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[39]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  PopTract: Population-Based Tractography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  K J Worsley,et al.  An overview and some new developments in the statistical analysis of PET and fMRI data , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: Multi‐subject parcellation of fMRI datasets , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[42]  Ronald R. Peeters,et al.  Mapping multiple visual areas in the human brain with a short fMRI sequence , 2006, NeuroImage.

[43]  P. Matthews,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[44]  Bennett A. Landman,et al.  Characterizing Spatially Varying Performance to Improve Multi-atlas Multi-label Segmentation , 2011, IPMI.

[45]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article , 2022 .

[48]  Kaiming Li,et al.  Gyral Folding Pattern Analysis via Surface Profiling , 2009, MICCAI.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[50]  Jinglei Lv,et al.  Resting State fMRI-Guided Fiber Clustering , 2011, MICCAI.

[51]  D. Heeger,et al.  In this issue , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[52]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[53]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  ABSORB: Atlas building by self-organized registration and bundling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[54]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Adaptive spatial smoothing of fMRI images , 2010 .

[55]  Kaiming Li,et al.  Cortical surface based identification of brain networks using high spatial resolution resting state FMRI data , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[56]  Lei Guo,et al.  Brain tissue segmentation based on DTI data , 2007, NeuroImage.

[57]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[58]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[59]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Lost in localization: The need for a universal coordinate database , 2009, NeuroImage.

[60]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Meta Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Data via Bayesian Spatial Point Processes , 2011, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[62]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Reducing inter-subject anatomical variation: Effect of normalization method on sensitivity of functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis in auditory cortex and the superior temporal region , 2009, NeuroImage.

[63]  Sergi G. Costafreda,et al.  Pooling fMRI Data: Meta-Analysis, Mega-Analysis and Multi-Center Studies , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..