Exact asymptotic analysis for metapopulation dynamics on correlated dynamic landscapes.

We compute the mean patch occupancy for a stochastic, spatially explicit patch-occupancy metapopulation model on a dynamic, correlated landscape, using a mathematically exact perturbation expansion about a mean-field limit that applies when dispersal range is large. Stochasticity in the metapopulation and landscape dynamics gives negative contributions to patch occupancy, the former being more important at high occupancy and the latter at low occupancy. Positive landscape correlations always benefit the metapopulation, but are only significant when the correlation length is comparable to, or smaller than, the dispersal range. Our analytical results allow us to consider the importance of spatial kernels in all generality. We find that the shape of the landscape correlation function is typically unimportant, and that the variance is overwhelmingly the most important property of the colonisation kernel. However, short-range singularities in either the colonisation kernel or landscape correlations can give rise to qualitatively different behaviour.

[1]  Stephen R. Baillie,et al.  Modeling large-scale dispersal distances , 2002 .

[2]  M. Wimberly Species Dynamics in Disturbed Landscapes: When does a Shifting Habitat Mosaic Enhance Connectivity? , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Asymptotically exact analysis of stochastic metapopulation dynamics with explicit spatial structure. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  A Spatially Explicit Neutral Model of β-Diversity in Tropical Forests , 2002 .

[5]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Utility of Dynamic‐Landscape Metapopulation Models for Sustainable Forest Management , 2005 .

[6]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment , 1992 .

[7]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  EFFECTS OF SUCCESSIONAL DYNAMICS ON METAPOPULATION PERSISTENCE , 2003 .

[8]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[9]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[10]  A. Hastings Metapopulation Persistence with Age-Dependent Disturbance or Succession , 2003, Science.

[11]  L. Allen,et al.  A spatially structured metapopulation model with patch dynamics. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Karin Johst,et al.  Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance , 2002 .

[13]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes , 2003, Journal of Applied Probability.

[14]  Benjamin M Bolker,et al.  Combining endogenous and exogenous spatial variability in analytical population models. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[16]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics , 2000 .

[17]  M. Vellend,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS IN CHANGING LANDSCAPES: A NEW SPATIALLY REALISTIC MODEL FOR FOREST PLANTS , 2004 .

[18]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly , 2002 .

[19]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies , 1994 .

[21]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[22]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[23]  M. Wimberly Spatial simulation of historical landscape patterns in coastal forests of the Pacific Northwest , 2002 .

[24]  J. Ross,et al.  Stochastic models for mainland-island metapopulations in static and dynamic landscapes , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[25]  T. Snäll,et al.  Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch‐tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal , 2003 .

[26]  Zhilan Feng,et al.  Merging Spatial and Temporal Structure within a Metapopulation Model , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Kirk A. Moloney,et al.  The Effects of Disturbance Architecture on Landscape-Level Population Dynamics , 1996 .

[28]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatially explicit simulation of long-term boreal forest landscape dynamics: incorporating quantitative stand attributes , 2004 .

[29]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[30]  M. Drechsler,et al.  Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species , 2003 .

[31]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  C. Thomas,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species , 1992 .

[33]  S. Larsson,et al.  Spatial occurrence of a habitat-tracking saproxylic beetle inhabiting a managed forest landscape. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[34]  Ran Nathan Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants , 2006, Science.

[35]  Jorge X Velasco-Hernández,et al.  Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[36]  T. Snäll,et al.  Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes – evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo‐nemoral forests , 2006 .

[37]  Robert Biedermann,et al.  Modelling the spatial dynamics and persistence of the leaf beetle Gonioctena olivacea in dynamic habitats , 2004 .

[38]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Spatially-correlated extinction in a metapopulation model of Leadbeater's Possum , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[39]  I. Hanski Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes , 1999 .

[40]  B. Goodger,et al.  The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Interactions between dispersal, competition, and landscape heterogeneity , 2007 .

[42]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[43]  J. Ross,et al.  A stochastic metapopulation model accounting for habitat dynamics , 2006, Journal of mathematical biology.

[44]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Space and stochasticity in population dynamics , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.