A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity

When participants commit errors or receive feedback signaling that they have made an error, a negative brain potential is elicited. According to Holroyd and Coles’s (in press) neurocomputational model of error processing, this error-related negativity (ERN) is elicited when the brain first detects that the consequences of an action are worse than expected. To study age-related changes in error processing, we obtained performance and ERN measures of younger and high-functioning older adults. Experiment 1 demonstrated reduced ERN amplitudes in older adults in the context of otherwise intact brain potentials. This result could not be attributed to uncertainty about the required response in older adults. Experiment 2 revealed impaired performance and reduced response- and feedback-related ERNs of older adults in a probabilistic learning task. These age changes could be simulated by manipulation of a single parameter of the neurocomputational model, this manipulation corresponding to weakened phasic activity of the mesencephalic dopamine system.

[1]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[3]  P. Rabbitt.  How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed , 1979 .

[4]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Regional changes of monoamines in cerebral cortex and subcortical structures of aging rhesus monkeys , 1981, Neuroscience.

[5]  J. C. Woestenburg,et al.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[6]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Alpha 2-adrenergic mechanisms in prefrontal cortex associated with cognitive decline in aged nonhuman primates. , 1985, Science.

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Arnsten,et al.  Catecholamine mechanisms in age-related cognitive decline , 1993, Neurobiology of Aging.

[11]  A Kok,et al.  Age-related differences in the timing of stimulus and response processes during visual selective attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[12]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[14]  T. Treasure.  Where did I go wrong? , 1994, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Coles,et al.  "Where did I go wrong?" A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Frontal Lobes, Memory, and Aging , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Donchin,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and error-related processing: an analysis of incorrect responses to go and no-go stimuli. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[18]  A Kok,et al.  Perceptual factors affecting age-related differences in focused attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[19]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  M. W. Molen,et al.  The growing and aging brain: Life-span changes in brain and cognitive functioning , 1997 .

[21]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[23]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Aging, intelligence, and anatomical segregation in the frontal lobes , 1998 .

[24]  N. Volkow,et al.  Association between decline in brain dopamine activity with age and cognitive and motor impairment in healthy individuals. , 1998, The American journal of psychiatry.

[25]  Michael G. H. Coles,et al.  Berger's dream? The error-related negativity and modern cognitive psychophysiology. , 1998 .

[26]  B. Kopp,et al.  An event-related brain potential substrate of disturbed response monitoring in paranoid schizophrenic patients. , 1999, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  J. Ford.  Schizophrenia: the broken P300 and beyond. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Siu Cheung Li,et al.  Cross-level unification: A computational exploration of the link between deterioration of neurotrans , 1999 .

[29]  Lars Farde,et al.  Age-related dopamine D2/D3 receptor loss in extrastriatal regions of the human brain , 2000, Neurobiology of Aging.

[30]  W. Gehring,et al.  Action-Monitoring Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , 2000, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Dixon,et al.  Age-related cognitive deficits mediated by changes in the striatal dopamine system. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[32]  A. Kok.  Age-related changes in involuntary and voluntary attention as reflected in components of the event-related potential (ERP) , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[33]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[34]  G. Band,et al.  Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[35]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[36]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  M. Coles,et al.  Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[39]  J. Yesavage,et al.  Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[41]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Action monitoring, error detection, and the basal ganglia: an ERP study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[42]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[43]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Changes of error-related ERPs with age , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Spared error-related potentials in mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.