Initial evidence-based analysis of risk levels per phases of flight, recency requirements and visual approach design in nighttime offshore helicopter operations

The analysis of risks per phases of flight is fundamental for safe nighttime offshore helicopter operations. However, the poor quality of the safety data currently available limits the identification of critical issues on a per-phase-of-flight basis. To redress this problem, this paper develops a customised taxonomy of phases of nighttime offshore helicopter flights and uses it as the basis for a questionnaire survey on the phase-specific risk levels experienced by pilots. Additionally, the critical issues of flying recency requirements and visual approach design preferences are investigated. With the responses obtained from pilots located in seven countries, extensive statistical hypothesis testing shows that the phases involving visual scan techniques at high speed regimes are problematic, especially the visual segment of instrument approaches. Furthermore, the between-night-flights time gaps required for assured recency were found considerably shorter than currently standardised across the industry. A number of important implications result and should form the basis for future safety interventions.

[1]  P. C. Smith,et al.  Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. , 1963 .

[2]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  Nighttime approaches to offshore installations in Brazil: Safety shortcomings experienced by helicopter pilots. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[4]  Michael J. Taber,et al.  Helicopter Ditching: Time of Crash and Survivability , 2006 .

[5]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  The context and habits of accident investigation practices: A study of 108 Swedish investigators , 2010 .

[6]  Felipe A.C. Nascimento,et al.  Investigating the Truth of Heinrich's Pyramid in Offshore Helicopter Transportation , 2013 .

[7]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  A multistage multinational triangulation approach to hazard identification in night-time offshore helicopter operations , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Da Howson Research Initiatives for Improving the Safety of Offshore Helicopter Operations , 2006 .

[9]  T. W. van der Schaaf,et al.  CHECKING FOR BIASES IN INCIDENT REPORTING. IN: ACCIDENT PRECURSOR ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT: REDUCING TECHNOLOGICAL RISK THROUGH DILIGENCE , 2004 .

[10]  Steven J. Landry Nighttime offshore helicopter operations – identification of contextual factors relevant to pilot performance , 2012 .

[11]  David Harris,et al.  Investigation into accident initiation events by flight phase, for highly inexperienced glider pilots , 2008 .

[12]  L Lisette Kanse,et al.  Checking for biases in incident reporting , 2001 .

[13]  M. Frakes,et al.  Transport nurse safety practices, perceptions, and experiences: the air and surface transport nurses association survey. , 2009, Air medical journal.

[14]  Washington Y. Ochieng,et al.  Helicopter Accident Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Felipe A.C. Nascimento,et al.  A 15-Year Multivariate Analysis Of Worldwide Offshore Helicopter Accidents , 2013 .

[16]  Richard Burns,et al.  Business Research Methods and Statistics Using SPSS , 2008 .

[17]  L Lisette Kanse,et al.  Biases in incident reporting databases: An empirical study in the chemical process industry , 2004 .

[18]  Felipe A.C. Nascimento,et al.  Factors affecting safety during night visual approach segments for offshore helicopters , 2012, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[19]  Sergio Teixeira Helicopter Flight Operational Quality Assurance (HFOQA): Development of HFOQA Analysis Software , 2006 .

[20]  Greg Boschert,et al.  Results and recommendations from the helicopter EMS pilot safety survey 2005. , 2007, Air medical journal.