Managing reverse knowledge flow in multinational corporations

Purpose – This study aims to provide insight to the little-researched phenomenon of reverse knowledge flow within multinational corporations (MNCs) and to explain the role of managerial attention in exploiting the prospect of knowledge transfer from subsidiaries located in developing countries. Design/methodology/approach – Existing literature across disciplines has been integrated to provide a clear description of the concept of reverse knowledge flow and managerial attention, in order to explain the role of managerial attention in reverse knowledge transfer activities within MNCs. Two pilot studies were conducted on European MNCs to build the background for this study. Findings – Managerial attention is a key factor in recognising potential source of knowledge within the multinational network, and a prior requirement for knowledge transfer to take place. Attention decisions are partially based on the knowledge source location, awareness/attractiveness, and the strategic importance. Thus, MNCs can adopt managerial practices and control mechanisms to influence the attention of executives and achieve higher knowledge flow from subsidiaries. Research limitations/implications – There is a need to undertake empirical research and in-depth case studies of knowledge management practices using the arguments and framework provided in this article. Practical implications – MNCs can develop mechanisms for overcoming attention biases influence on reverse knowledge flow. The attention based approach can lead to better subsidiary integration and knowledge management practices in MNCs. Originality/value – This study advances the theory on reverse knowledge flow in MNCs by presenting an attention based theoretical framework for effective knowledge transfer.

[1]  Li Li,et al.  Managing Knowledge Transfer in Mncs: The Impact of Headquarters Control Mechanisms , 2004 .

[2]  Ulf Holm,et al.  The Role of Headquarters in the Contemporary MNC , 2012 .

[3]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[4]  T. Kostova.  Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[5]  Larissa Rabbiosi,et al.  Subsidiary Roles and Reverse Knowledge Transfer: An Investigation of the Effects of Coordination Mechanisms , 2011 .

[6]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Headquarters’ Influence on Knowledge Transfer Performance , 2010 .

[7]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[8]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[10]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[11]  Martin Schulz,et al.  Pathways of Relevance: Exploring Inflows of Knowledge into Subunits of Multinational Corporations , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[12]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[13]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[14]  David Y. Choi,et al.  The shortcomings of a standardized global knowledge management system: The case study of Accenture , 2005 .

[15]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters , 2008 .

[16]  Lorena M. D'Agostino.  The neglected effects of R&D captive offshoring in emerging countries on the creation of knowledge at home , 2015 .

[17]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success , 2003 .

[18]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[19]  H. Greve.  Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 2013 .

[20]  D. A. Cowan.  Developing a Process Model of Problem Recognition , 1986 .

[21]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  Technology characteristics and reverse technology transfer , 2000 .

[22]  Robert Nobel,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Reverse Technology Transfer1 , 2001 .

[23]  Bent Petersen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer Performance of Multinational Companies , 2001 .

[24]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[25]  Melvin R. Crask,et al.  Value Assessment: The Antecedent of Customer Satisfaction , 2000 .

[26]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[27]  Björn Ambos,et al.  How Do MNC Headquarters Add Value? , 2010 .

[28]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  Shige Makino,et al.  Which country matters? Institutional development and foreign affiliate performance , 2008 .

[30]  J. Dutton,et al.  IMPORTANT DIMENSIONS OF STRATEGIC ISSUES: SEPARATING THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF* , 1989 .

[31]  Schon Beechler,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations , 2007 .

[32]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[33]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[34]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[35]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Knowledge flows and the modelling of the multinational enterprise , 2007 .

[36]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Learning from Experience in Organizations , 1985 .

[37]  Refik Culpan.  The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation , 1997 .

[38]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[39]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1988 .

[40]  G. Johnson,et al.  Ceos' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization , 1994 .

[41]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations , 2009 .

[42]  Tony S. Frost,et al.  R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms , 2005 .

[43]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[44]  Denice Welch,et al.  In the shadow: the impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational , 1999 .

[45]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Transferring Subsidiary Knowledge in the Global Learning Context , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[47]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  International attention and multinational enterprise performance , 2008 .

[48]  Mie Augier,et al.  Understanding context: its emergence, transformation and role in tacit knowledge sharing , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[49]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations: Explaining Subsidiary Isolation and Its Performance Implications , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis , 1983 .

[52]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[53]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge , 2001 .

[54]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[55]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Katarina Vahl Bendixen.  Copenhagen Business School , 2004 .

[57]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers , 2004 .

[58]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Effectiveness and Efficiency of Cross-Border Knowledge Transfer: An Empirical Examination , 2008 .

[59]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[60]  M. Roth,et al.  Matching Product Catgeory and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects , 1992 .

[61]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[62]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[63]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† , 2008 .

[64]  Susan M. Mudambi,et al.  Global Innovation in MNCs: The Effects of Subsidiary Self-Determination and Teamwork† , 2007 .

[65]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Consequences of perception gaps in the headquarters-subsidiary relationship , 2000 .

[66]  O. Levy.  The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms , 2005 .

[67]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .