Risk perception and the value of safety.

This paper examines the relationship between perceived risk and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for increased safety from technological hazards in both conceptual and empirical terms. A conceptual model is developed in which a given household's WTP for risk reductions is a function of traditional socioeconomic variables (i.e., income and base level of risk) and perceived characteristics of the hazards (i.e., dread, knowledge, and exposure). Data to estimate the model are obtained through a combined contingent valuation and risk perception survey that considers 10 technological hazards, five of which are well-defined (e.g., death rates are known and the risks are relatively common) and five are less well-defined. Econometric results, using TOBIT estimation procedures, support the importance of both types of variables in explaining WTP across all 10 hazards. When the risks are split into two groups, the results show that WTP for well-defined hazards is most influenced by perceived personal exposure, while WTP for less well-defined risks is most influenced by levels of dread and severity.

[1]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[2]  R. Morgenstern,et al.  Weighing environmental risks: EPA's unfinished business , 1988 .

[3]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[4]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  V K Smith,et al.  Benefit analysis for natural hazards. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  H. Otway Multidimensional criteria for technology acceptability: a response to Bernard L. Cohen. , 1985, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Bernard L. Cohen,et al.  Criteria for Technology Acceptability1 , 1985 .

[8]  M. G. Morgan Risk assessment: Choosing and managing technology-induced risk: How much risk should we choose to live with? How should we assess and manage the risks we face? , 1981, IEEE Spectrum.

[9]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  The Uses of Tobit Analysis , 1980 .

[10]  Joseph S. Pliskin,et al.  The Economic Value of Changing Mortality Probabilities: A Decision-Theoretic Approach , 1980 .

[11]  R. Howard On Making Life and Death Decisions , 1980 .

[12]  J. Linnerooth,et al.  The value of human life: a review of the models. , 1979, Economic inquiry.

[13]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The value of life: An economic analysis , 1976 .

[14]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[15]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.