Hitchhiking nanoparticles: Reversible coupling of lipid-based nanoparticles to cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Following intravenous injection of anti-cancer nanomedicines, many barriers need to be overcome en route to the tumor. Cell-mediated delivery of nanoparticles (NPs) is promising in terms of overcoming several of these barriers based on the tumoritropic migratory properties of particular cell types. This guided transport aims to enhance the NP accumulation in the tumor and moreover enhance the infiltration of regions that are typically inaccessible for free NPs. Within this study, cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells were selected as carriers based on both their ability to migrate to the tumor and their intrinsic cytolytic activity against tumor cells. Many anti-cancer nanomedicines require tumor cell internalization to mediate cytosolic drug delivery and enhance the anti-cancer effect. This proof-of-concept therefore reports on the reversible attachment of liposomes to the surface of cytotoxic T lymphocytes via a reduction sensitive coupling. The activation status of the T cells and the liposome composition are shown to strongly influence the loading efficiency. Loading the cells with liposomes does not compromise T cell functionalities like proliferation and cytolytic function. Additionally, the triggered liposome release is demonstrated upon the addition of glutathione. Based on this optimization using liposomes as model NPs, a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-loaded NP was developed that can be coupled to the surface of CD8(+) T cells.

[1]  Darrell J Irvine,et al.  Enhancing Cell therapies from the Outside In: Cell Surface Engineering Using Synthetic Nanomaterials. , 2011, Nano today.

[2]  Robert Langer,et al.  Nanoparticulate cellular patches for cell-mediated tumoritropic delivery. , 2010, ACS nano.

[3]  J. Ljubimova,et al.  Nanomedicine therapeutic approaches to overcome cancer drug resistance. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  S. Sleijfer,et al.  TCR-Engineered T Cells Meet New Challenges to Treat Solid Tumors: Choice of Antigen, T Cell Fitness, and Sensitization of Tumor Milieu , 2013, Front. Immunol..

[5]  A. Torres,et al.  Exploiting cell surface thiols to enhance cellular uptake. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[6]  H. Maeda,et al.  The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[7]  Roosmarijn E. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Biodegradable Dextran Nanogels for RNA Interference: Focusing on Endosomal Escape and Intracellular siRNA Delivery , 2009 .

[8]  M. Heemskerk,et al.  In vitro generation of mature, naive antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with a single T-cell receptor by agonist selection , 2014, Leukemia.

[9]  C. Lewis,et al.  Mechanisms regulating the recruitment of macrophages into hypoxic areas of tumors and other ischemic tissues. , 2004, Blood.

[10]  C. Klebanoff,et al.  Sorting Through Subsets: Which T-Cell Populations Mediate Highly Effective Adoptive Immunotherapy? , 2012, Journal of immunotherapy.

[11]  Soong Ho Um,et al.  Therapeutic cell engineering using surface-conjugated synthetic nanoparticles , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[12]  S. Wise Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy , 2007 .

[13]  Jennifer Sturgis,et al.  A cellular Trojan Horse for delivery of therapeutic nanoparticles into tumors. , 2007, Nano letters.

[14]  Jan E Schnitzer,et al.  Overcoming in vivo barriers to targeted nanodelivery. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[15]  Francesco Stellacci,et al.  Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. , 2010, Small.

[16]  Mehrdad Hamidi,et al.  Applications of carrier erythrocytes in delivery of biopharmaceuticals. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[17]  P. Hogg,et al.  Disulfide bonds as switches for protein function. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[18]  Sebastian Amigorena,et al.  In vivo imaging of cytotoxic T cell infiltration and elimination of a solid tumor , 2007 .

[19]  W. Hennink,et al.  Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[20]  S. D. De Smedt,et al.  A personalized view on cancer immunotherapy. , 2014, Cancer letters.

[21]  H. Gilbert Molecular and cellular aspects of thiol-disulfide exchange. , 2006, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.

[22]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Cell-mediated delivery of nanoparticles: taking advantage of circulatory cells to target nanoparticles. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[23]  K. Braeckmans,et al.  Bio-inspired pulmonary surfactant-modified nanogels: A promising siRNA delivery system. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  Thomas L Andresen,et al.  Liposomal cancer therapy: exploiting tumor characteristics , 2010, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[25]  I. Mellman,et al.  Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. , 2013, Immunity.

[26]  N. Svrzikapa,et al.  First-in-humans trial of an RNA interference therapeutic targeting VEGF and KSP in cancer patients with liver involvement. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[27]  Nastassja A. Lewinski,et al.  T cells enhance gold nanoparticle delivery to tumors in vivo , 2011, Nanoscale research letters.

[28]  B. Fox,et al.  Increased Frequency of Suppressive Regulatory T Cells and T Cell-Mediated Antigen Loss Results in Murine Melanoma Recurrence , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  Xiaoyang Xu,et al.  Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[30]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Cell‐Based Drug Delivery Devices Using Phagocytosis‐Resistant Backpacks , 2011, Advanced materials.

[31]  Wolfgang A. Weber,et al.  Impact of tumor-specific targeting on the biodistribution and efficacy of siRNA nanoparticles measured by multimodality in vivo imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  D. Curiel,et al.  Cell vehicle targeting strategies , 2008, Gene Therapy.

[33]  Atique U. Ahmed,et al.  Tumor-targeted, systemic delivery of therapeutic viral vectors using hitchhiking on antigen-specific T cells , 2005, Nature Medicine.

[34]  T. Eberlein Durable Complete Responses in Heavily Pretreated Patients with metastatic Melanoma Using T-Cell Transfer Immunotherapy , 2012 .

[35]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Mechanism of active targeting in solid tumors with transferrin-containing gold nanoparticles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  D. Irvine,et al.  Active targeting of chemotherapy to disseminated tumors using nanoparticle-carrying T cells , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[37]  Enzo Di Fabrizio,et al.  Nanoparticle-based delivery of small interfering RNA: challenges for cancer therapy , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[38]  Keith M. Stantz,et al.  Delivery of nanoparticles to brain metastases of breast cancer using a cellular Trojan horse , 2012, Cancer Nanotechnology.

[39]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Adoptive cell therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2009, Current opinion in immunology.

[40]  P. Cullis,et al.  Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. , 2013, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[41]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Materials for Drug Delivery: Innovative Solutions to Address Complex Biological Hurdles , 2012, Advanced materials.

[42]  C. Vervaet,et al.  Sizing Nanomatter in Biological Fluids by Fluorescence Single Particle Tracking , 2011 .

[43]  K. Braeckmans,et al.  A fast and sensitive method for measuring the integrity of siRNA-carrier complexes in full human serum. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[44]  D. Irvine,et al.  Synapse-directed delivery of immunomodulators using T-cell-conjugated nanoparticles. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[45]  M. Shipkova,et al.  Surface markers of lymphocyte activation and markers of cell proliferation. , 2012, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[46]  U. Nielsen,et al.  Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models. , 2006, Cancer research.

[47]  G. Coukos,et al.  Deciphering and reversing tumor immune suppression. , 2013, Immunity.

[48]  J. Brown,et al.  Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[49]  L. Herzenberg,et al.  Lymphocyte surface thiol levels , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  M. Magnani,et al.  Erythrocyte-based drug delivery , 2005, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[51]  V. Sanna,et al.  Targeted therapy using nanotechnology: focus on cancer , 2014, International journal of nanomedicine.

[52]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Challenges associated with Penetration of Nanoparticles across Cell and Tissue Barriers: A Review of Current Status and Future Prospects. , 2014, Nano today.

[53]  Pedro M. Valencia,et al.  Targeted Polymeric Therapeutic Nanoparticles: Design, Development and Clinical Translation , 2012 .

[54]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Long Circulating Nanoparticles via Adhesion on Red Blood Cells: Mechanism and Extended Circulation , 2007, Experimental biology and medicine.

[55]  Omid C Farokhzad,et al.  Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[56]  R. Jain,et al.  Challenges and key considerations of the enhanced permeability and retention effect for nanomedicine drug delivery in oncology. , 2013, Cancer research.

[57]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Monocyte-mediated delivery of polymeric backpacks to inflamed tissues: a generalized strategy to deliver drugs to treat inflammation. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.